Pages:
Author

Topic: ndnhc[resolved] - page 3. (Read 9014 times)

legendary
Activity: 1134
Merit: 1118
May 31, 2015, 06:15:54 AM
I really hope that ndnhc can prove his innocence now and these claims are proved false. I have interacted with him in the past and he seems quite decent and trustworthy and this claim (if proved true) would make me trust absolutely nobody from this forum. It's surprising that one can trust a newbie who has just created his account on May 10th and has 4 posts with one post predicting after the contest ends. May be the newbie must have had a personal grudge against him or against dadice.


Personally by now I think he's been framed, the things he's brought up in his defence are quite convincing and to be honest I don't think he has much of an incentive to scam for a measly 0.1 BTC. I encourage Vod and QS to also consider changing their ratings to neutral for now until a definite conclusion is reached like I have.

So true. He being a campaign manager and trying to extort $25? It's surprising that people even believed it without a thought, claiming that he was not in charge of the funds of his campaign and he was involved in Games & Rounds to earn few bits and hence he can rob $25 as now Dadice is a possible scam site. I was thinking of using him as an escrow once when I dint trust other members here.

It's not the first time that one trusted member has been framed as people have also accused theymos before.

Yeah, I suppose so - at this point I'm just going to try and keep out of the whole thing. I'm kind of confused :s I'd rather just let all the other DefaultTrust people deal with it tbh, can't be bothered anymore.
legendary
Activity: 2632
Merit: 1094
May 31, 2015, 05:45:58 AM
I really hope that ndnhc can prove his innocence now and these claims are proved false. I have interacted with him in the past and he seems quite decent and trustworthy and this claim (if proved true) would make me trust absolutely nobody from this forum. It's surprising that one can trust a newbie who has just created his account on May 10th and has 4 posts with one post predicting after the contest ends. May be the newbie must have had a personal grudge against him or against dadice.


Personally by now I think he's been framed, the things he's brought up in his defence are quite convincing and to be honest I don't think he has much of an incentive to scam for a measly 0.1 BTC. I encourage Vod and QS to also consider changing their ratings to neutral for now until a definite conclusion is reached like I have.

So true. He being a campaign manager and trying to extort $25? It's surprising that people even believed it without a thought, claiming that he was not in charge of the funds of his campaign and he was involved in Games & Rounds to earn few bits and hence he can rob $25 as now Dadice is a possible scam site. I was thinking of using him as an escrow once when I dint trust other members here.

It's not the first time that one trusted member has been framed as people have also accused theymos before.
legendary
Activity: 2562
Merit: 1064
May 31, 2015, 05:39:59 AM
If anyone think I would participate in dadice prediction contest after the prediction time has expired just so that I can show case 'my' 17-months-unused-address, you are nuts.

Is that even normal? What is the purpose of the one post 'question2', the alt of someone who has something against me, except than to frame me? Then edit it later, so that it makes look as if I did it? Wow.

CURRENT ROLL AND CLOSED GUESSING!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Currently we are almost at 142 million rolls! Don't forget that the Bounty of 0.5BTC on June 19th can increase by 0.05BTC for ever day earlier

Please note now that the timeframe for guessing the date of the roll for 0.1BTC has officially closed now. I would like to wish all of you who have entered masses of good luck! Please keep an eye on this thread as we count down the rolls!





Nice to see Dadice helping a cause here

My prediction : 5th June
12Ey8KPWPcv22VVUdZWCTQFZH97YyIXAuE


Just one of my points. It doesn't take a genius to figure out I am being framed here.

I think now it's clear, and end of the debate.

100% someone framed him, a campaign manager must know when promotion going to end.
legendary
Activity: 1134
Merit: 1118
May 31, 2015, 05:22:15 AM
I really hope that ndnhc can prove his innocence now and these claims are proved false. I have interacted with him in the past and he seems quite decent and trustworthy and this claim (if proved true) would make me trust absolutely nobody from this forum. It's surprising that one can trust a newbie who has just created his account on May 10th and has 4 posts with one post predicting after the contest ends. May be the newbie must have had a personal grudge against him or against dadice.


Personally by now I think he's been framed, the things he's brought up in his defence are quite convincing and to be honest I don't think he has much of an incentive to scam for a measly 0.1 BTC. I encourage Vod and QS to also consider changing their ratings to neutral for now until a definite conclusion is reached like I have.
legendary
Activity: 2632
Merit: 1094
May 31, 2015, 05:11:42 AM
I really hope that ndnhc can prove his innocence now and these claims are proved false. I have interacted with him in the past and he seems quite decent and trustworthy and this claim (if proved true) would make me trust absolutely nobody from this forum. It's surprising that one can trust a newbie who has just created his account on May 10th and has 4 posts with one post predicting after the contest ends. May be the newbie must have had a personal grudge against him or against dadice.
legendary
Activity: 1778
Merit: 1043
#Free market
May 31, 2015, 05:08:39 AM
There is always someone that wants to ruin your reputation, like the same thing that it was happened to me some months ago. I hope this is only a big 'misunderstanding', ndnhc prove that question 2 is not your alt account and I am sure all the negative trust will be removed.


sr. member
Activity: 588
Merit: 285
May 31, 2015, 03:56:43 AM
ndnhc's all points seem valid and legit to me. He has been a nice guy in the forum in the past and am sure he isn't an extorionist.
hero member
Activity: 1008
Merit: 501
May 31, 2015, 03:02:50 AM
What a broken community , whoever did this is sick
legendary
Activity: 1134
Merit: 1118
May 31, 2015, 02:29:56 AM
If anyone think I would participate in dadice prediction contest after the prediction time has expired just so that I can show case 'my' 17-months-unused-address, you are nuts.

Is that even normal? What is the purpose of the one post 'question2', the alt of someone who has something against me, except than to frame me? Then edit it later, so that it makes look as if I did it? Wow.

CURRENT ROLL AND CLOSED GUESSING!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Currently we are almost at 142 million rolls! Don't forget that the Bounty of 0.5BTC on June 19th can increase by 0.05BTC for ever day earlier

Please note now that the timeframe for guessing the date of the roll for 0.1BTC has officially closed now. I would like to wish all of you who have entered masses of good luck! Please keep an eye on this thread as we count down the rolls!





Nice to see Dadice helping a cause here

My prediction : 5th June
12Ey8KPWPcv22VVUdZWCTQFZH97YyIXAuE


Just one of my points. It doesn't take a genius to figure out I am being framed here.

That's...a really good point. It was after the closing time...

Well that's definitely a point in your favour, I think you would know when that competition would've ended...
legendary
Activity: 1302
Merit: 1005
New Decentralized Nuclear Hobbit
May 31, 2015, 02:25:25 AM
If anyone think I would participate in dadice prediction contest after the prediction time has expired just so that I can show case 'my' 17-months-unused-address, you are nuts.

Is that even normal? What is the purpose of the one post 'question2', the alt of someone who has something against me, except than to frame me? Then edit it later, so that it makes look as if I did it? Wow.

CURRENT ROLL AND CLOSED GUESSING!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Currently we are almost at 142 million rolls! Don't forget that the Bounty of 0.5BTC on June 19th can increase by 0.05BTC for ever day earlier

Please note now that the timeframe for guessing the date of the roll for 0.1BTC has officially closed now. I would like to wish all of you who have entered masses of good luck! Please keep an eye on this thread as we count down the rolls!





Nice to see Dadice helping a cause here

My prediction : 5th June
12Ey8KPWPcv22VVUdZWCTQFZH97YyIXAuE


Just one of my points. It doesn't take a genius to figure out I am being framed here.
hero member
Activity: 568
Merit: 500
Smoke weed everyday!
May 31, 2015, 02:09:15 AM
LOL! Tongue

Let me read the thread..

Edit: Seriously, it can't be.  Undecided
This post here: https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.11467648 was made on 27yth May and edited on 28th.
I didn't have access to internet on 28th, 29th, and 30th.

On 27th however I logged in for a few minutes I got, and arranged for Carra23 and bf4btc to take over. Former by email, and latter by a single PM - the only thing I did that day.

I can confirm this and any 'one' trusted member that wants to see the pm is welcome to pm me for my log in details which you will receive.
hero member
Activity: 952
Merit: 516
May 31, 2015, 01:16:34 AM
When his account was created here he used to post on the games and rounds section all kind of stupid games to earn a little bit of money

I found it funny, this coming from someone whose account also posted in games and round section when it was created also

later he took and gave loans to increase his rep

It is not a "must" to leave feedback for lending something though, that would be his lender choice to leave him feedback. By this logic, then anyone willing to loan is also trying to increase reputation? this is a bogus logic though

since he is never in possesion of the money so there is no risk.

Even if someone fail to extort, a negative feedback is still a must. If ndnhc is guilty, negative feedback is appropriate. One single mistake will lead a destruction to your reputation here. However, he has been providing some fact and also explanation that he is not "question2" (though I personally dont believe he is  Wink )

Are you commenting random stuff to increase your post count? Why do you quote me saying that he had no risk because was using another account to tell me that negative feedback is a must?? When did i say it was not??

I said games and rounds not because of the section but because he was always posting stupid games for people to play and him to win money.

I also said that trust feedback doesnt always mean anything, him getting green trust because he was a manager of a campaign is stupid, being the manager there doesnt make him trusted, he didnt have any money from dadice so he wasnt able to scam even if he wanted to.

About the loans, if you give loans and take collateral, for example, does that make you trusted?? Not for me.
legendary
Activity: 2562
Merit: 1414
May 31, 2015, 01:06:42 AM
When his account was created here he used to post on the games and rounds section all kind of stupid games to earn a little bit of money

I found it funny, this coming from someone whose account also posted in games and round section when it was created also

later he took and gave loans to increase his rep

It is not a "must" to leave feedback for lending something though, that would be his lender choice to leave him feedback. By this logic, then anyone willing to loan is also trying to increase reputation? this is a bogus logic though

since he is never in possesion of the money so there is no risk.

Even if someone fail to extort, a negative feedback is still a must. If ndnhc is guilty, negative feedback is appropriate. One single mistake will lead a destruction to your reputation here. However, he has been providing some fact and also explanation that he is not "question2" (though I personally dont believe he is  Wink )
hero member
Activity: 952
Merit: 516
May 31, 2015, 12:43:53 AM
I totally believe he is question2 and a scammer extortionist. When his account was created here he used to post on the games and rounds section all kind of stupid games to earn a little bit of money, later he took and gave loans to increase his rep and for some reason dadice made him the manager of their campaign, after that of course he gained way more trust that i personally consider totally useless since he is never in possesion of the money so there is no risk.
legendary
Activity: 1134
Merit: 1118
May 31, 2015, 12:42:30 AM
-a quote would be here, but the quote chain is getting long-

He hasn't actually blocked it yet, at least that's what he told me when I was PM'ing him a couple days ago. For those wondering why his quote doesn't match what I said, I rephrased that post like 3 times. No idea why. XD

Yeah I mean arguments for him being framed, let me fix that. Cheers Smiley
copper member
Activity: 2996
Merit: 2374
May 31, 2015, 12:37:47 AM
Both addresses have not been used from 2014 Jan 5.

I really want to know where he got that address from.. But, I don't have much hope hearing back from question2. Sad
 -snip-

By looking at the sending and receiving transactions, it didn't look like a deposit address.

https://www.walletexplorer.com/wallet/2016db899b159d2c?from_address=12Ey8KPWPcv22VVUdZWCTQFZH97Yy1XAuE

Hmm, you're certainly right, that address was definitely used often before. It doesn't seem to be a shared wallet address either, unless someone with more experience wants to correct me on that...? I could be wrong, you never know.

I know. Great pick of an address! Tongue
I have my list of possible suspects.

PM'd you.
Sorry for making it that long.

Yeah, got it, it's fine. Set my feedback to a neutral for now as I said, I'll watch the thread for a little while and if I'm 100% satisfied you were framed I'll then remove it. The points you raised are completely valid points.

If anyone's wondering the PM was, pretty much just arguments against him being framed with some extra info. No, it's not going in public. Vod got the PM too.
How did Vod get the PM? He has his PM's blocked Huh

Quote
pretty much just arguments against him being framed with some extra info
You mean arguments for him being framed right?

For the record, I have not received any kind of communication from him as of now
legendary
Activity: 1134
Merit: 1118
May 31, 2015, 12:33:27 AM
Both addresses have not been used from 2014 Jan 5.

I really want to know where he got that address from.. But, I don't have much hope hearing back from question2. Sad
 -snip-

By looking at the sending and receiving transactions, it didn't look like a deposit address.

https://www.walletexplorer.com/wallet/2016db899b159d2c?from_address=12Ey8KPWPcv22VVUdZWCTQFZH97Yy1XAuE

Hmm, you're certainly right, that address was definitely used often before. It doesn't seem to be a shared wallet address either, unless someone with more experience wants to correct me on that...? I could be wrong, you never know.

I know. Great pick of an address! Tongue
I have my list of possible suspects.

PM'd you.
Sorry for making it that long.

Yeah, got it, it's fine. Set my feedback to a neutral for now as I said, I'll watch the thread for a little while and if I'm 100% satisfied you were framed I'll then remove it. The points you raised are completely valid points.

If anyone's wondering the PM was, pretty much just arguments for him being framed with some extra info. I wasn't the only person to get the PM either.
legendary
Activity: 1302
Merit: 1005
New Decentralized Nuclear Hobbit
May 31, 2015, 12:28:30 AM
Both addresses have not been used from 2014 Jan 5.

I really want to know where he got that address from.. But, I don't have much hope hearing back from question2. Sad
 -snip-

By looking at the sending and receiving transactions, it didn't look like a deposit address.

https://www.walletexplorer.com/wallet/2016db899b159d2c?from_address=12Ey8KPWPcv22VVUdZWCTQFZH97Yy1XAuE

Hmm, you're certainly right, that address was definitely used often before. It doesn't seem to be a shared wallet address either, unless someone with more experience wants to correct me on that...? I could be wrong, you never know.

I know. Great pick of an address! Tongue
I have my list of possible suspects.

PM'd you.
Sorry for making it that long.
legendary
Activity: 1134
Merit: 1118
May 31, 2015, 12:27:00 AM
Both addresses have not been used from 2014 Jan 5.

I really want to know where he got that address from.. But, I don't have much hope hearing back from question2. Sad
 -snip-

By looking at the sending and receiving transactions, it didn't look like a deposit address.

https://www.walletexplorer.com/wallet/2016db899b159d2c?from_address=12Ey8KPWPcv22VVUdZWCTQFZH97Yy1XAuE

Hmm, you're certainly right, that address was definitely used often before. It doesn't seem to be a shared wallet address either, unless someone with more experience wants to correct me on that...? I could be wrong, you never know.
hero member
Activity: 560
Merit: 509
I prefer Zakir over Muhammed when mentioning me!
May 31, 2015, 12:10:28 AM
Both addresses have not been used from 2014 Jan 5.

I really want to know where he got that address from.. But, I don't have much hope hearing back from question2. Sad
 -snip-

By looking at the sending and receiving transactions, it didn't look like a deposit address.

https://www.walletexplorer.com/wallet/2016db899b159d2c?from_address=12Ey8KPWPcv22VVUdZWCTQFZH97Yy1XAuE
Pages:
Jump to: