Topic: Necronomicon thread: Altcoins which are dead. - page 7. (Read 43886 times)

You can remove Cannacoin.  Market cap steadily growing and we are now on Bittrex.  Head to  #cannacoin on Freenode IRC and see for yourself our quickly growing community.

Our developer is full-time.  Thanks.

https://coinmarketcap.com/ccn_180.html

https://bittrex.com/Market/Index?MarketName=BTC-CCN

https://www.swisscex.com/market/CCN_BTC

http://www.nwgt.org/forumdisplay.php?122-Cannacoin-General-Discussion

http://www.nwgt.org/showthread.php?20277-NWGT-graphics-and-logo-designs

The only reason I went and got the coingen list in the first place was because it was one of relatively few lists of cryptocurrencies that wasn't getting erased as the cryptocurrencies died.  I figured if I didn't look at the coingen list, I was going to miss several. 

A developer works with a codebase, and whether or not he just downloads one and does the rebranding himself, or spends a few bucks to get coingen to do that first little bit of the work, doesn't make any difference.  It's what happens after that (if anything) that makes it a non-clone.

Anyway, it seems like a lot of people are reading a hell of a lot more into a note that something was started at coingen than that note actually says.  I don't know what it means to them, but when we get a situation where someone who actually paid them the money for a codebase then claims he didn't, or wants it known that he wasted his money and what he eventually developed wasn't derived from that purchased codebase, I'm just baffled.  It doesn't matter what you start with, it matters what you end up with. 

Also I keep hearing things like "It couldn't possibly be a coingen coin because the distribution function doesn't work like coingen's!"  And I'm thinking, duh, lots of cryptocurrencies' distribution functions don't work like the distribution functions in the code they were based on.  That's what developers do, they change code.  If you're working from some kind of assumption that because coingen was ever involved, then the code downloaded from them is unalterable, you're failing to comprehend what code is in some profound way.  That's completely not the way it works. 

So anyway, I want to ask; what the heck does coingen-generated mean to you all?  'Cause if most of you are thinking wrongly that it means nothing else was ever done to the code or that no further modifications could have been made?  Then I shouldn't be putting it there in the first place because even though it says nothing of the kind, people are reading it in a way that's misleading them. 

Don't you think a polite PM asking for the tag removal would've sufficed?

Btw, sorry for not calling you by name, i was being lazy and didn't want to push the back button

Ok then, I actually know what respect is.

Then Please tell this dude to modify the bullshit statement that POP is a Coingen Coin, wouldn't you be pissed if you and a team worked on a code and some dbag came along and said it was a coingen?

It should be [Size=1093274983752394057x12454365pt]

And you can call me JET, I am soaking up the coins right now and about to take a run for it once we modify the code here pretty soon. OP insulted POP more than I could have ever insulted him. Get it?

Please fellow BTCTalk users,

Keep the holy wars to religions and such. This list has some rules to it, and it must be considered for some coins as a lesson to learn and for others as a call to action. If your market cap is below $5K you're in trouble. Stop talking shit here and go get some action going on your preferred coin. No need to insult OP or start flame wars.

The guy of popcoin, please, stop posting annoying hyper-large fonts posts. It annoys people and reporting it gets it removed asap, no need to have that mark on your history here.

Your Still Full of Shit dude, POP is not a Coingen Coin, haha

Oh, come on.  "has traded above a market cap of $5K for one hour out of the last week" is not nearly the same as "alive and well."  Why did you get me to waste my time going and looking at that?  Heck, why did I fall for it?

If something isn't just circling the drain, it can stay above the mark for 90 days.  If it hasn't, it's not coming off the list.  These are the ground rules here: If I was taking crap off and putting it back on every time it transited the line I'd be spending my whole life on this. 

UVC is alive and well. It has almost 1 BTC of action in the past 24 hours on Bittrex.

Heh.  True, some get on a bit early due to random fluctuation. 

But seriously, do you think *anything* on this list isn't on a one-way trip to the trashcan?

The $5K mark is there mainly so I don't miss them before they're gone.   And, well, because anything which has fallen that far is not really all that likely to recover. 

I expect Hobbitcoin to come bouncing back down -- and if it doesn't, I'll take it off of there eventually.

Just three days ago you added that coin to your dead list. I think maybe you are a bit too quick to add coins.

In other news, Hobbitcoin appears to be on a pump.  It has risen %2540 in four days.