Pages:
Author

Topic: Nefario - page 29. (Read 198674 times)

donator
Activity: 1120
Merit: 1001
October 28, 2012, 01:53:13 AM
I hope Nefario would read the previous posts. If he cannot return the bitcoin and asset information, he cannot return back to his normal life and move on. There will be lots of people after him.

I don't think what happened is easy for Nefario. 8000 bitcoin is not a big money worth destroying one's reputation, and he almost pissed off the whole community. We all remember that once upon a time what kind of trust Nefario has in this community.

Nefario is already paying price for what he has done.

Hope that he will do the right thing as fast as possible, for his own and community's good.
hero member
Activity: 868
Merit: 1000
October 28, 2012, 01:25:05 AM

From what I understand nefario only had a couple thousand BTC in his wallet and the majority of the BTC was passed through to the asset issuer. Unless you have proof otherwise, I doubt there will be enough assets to recover from nefario to sue for in any court.


The funds which nefario has been returning to users are supposed to be user funds held by GLBSE, not funds held by the asset issuers.  None of the shareholders have suggested that GLBSE didn't have all the user funds it should have.  At the time GLBSE was closed the shareholders believed that GLBSE had user funds on hand plus some reserves of its own.  To the extent that there's a short-fall, it seem to have been caused only by nefario's overpayment of some people and if the majority of those coins have been recovered there is no reason whatsoever to delay resuming repayments.  There has never been a good reason to delay releasing the information needed for asset issuers and their users to communicate with each other until after the repayment process was completed.

A series of bad ideas becomes indistinguishable from scamming when you're literally announcing publicly that everything you're doing is legally fine and that representation is based on absolutely nothing because you haven't even bothered to seek legal advice before making publicly making that assurance.  Refusing to hand over the information needed for users and asset issuers to communicate with one another is just grand-standing and the delay in handing it over may even render that information useless.  nefario is absolutely responsible for the consequences of that decision.

People aren't going to try to sue nefario.  What they're far more likely to do if he continues to piss them off with his "fuck you" attitude is draw his activities to the attention of the very authorities he was hoping to avoid getting scrutiny from. 
sr. member
Activity: 966
Merit: 311
October 28, 2012, 12:00:20 AM

I think James should stop using any remaining unreturned funds as an excuse for not putting asset-issuers and their users in contact with one another.  until he does that, he has no credibility whatsoever.  He's hardly in a position to take the moral high ground over unreturned funds when he's the one who is holding information which has nothing to do with his overpayment fuck-up hostage.

And if 3/4 of the overpayments have been returned then GLBSE should now have sufficient funds to make the remaining payments - they can do it out of the already returned overpayments and their own reserves.  James is the one trying to pressure people, not the reverse..  He is the one who loses if those funds aren't returned because there'll be no funds left to pay his salary/lawyer/weed bill/whatever.  He's acting out of pure self-interest here.

Naming and shaming people who haven't returned over-payments doesn't prove that they are holding the money of other users.  Nefario could only prove that by giving a complete financial accounting of BTC on hand and amounts still owed to users and I doubt there's anyone here who would trust any numbers he published because there's absolutely no way to verify them - he's not even letting the other shareholders verify what he's doing and could be paying his friends triple what they're owed for all you know.

All Nefario's SuperSekrit Stalled Until Further Notice repayment plan is likely to do is piss people off enough that they'll rain down upon him the very kind of legal problems he hoped to avoid by closing down GLBSE in the first place.

From what I understand nefario only had a couple thousand BTC in his wallet and the majority of the BTC was passed through to the asset issuer. Unless you have proof otherwise, I doubt there will be enough assets to recover from nefario to sue for in any court.

Please keep in mind that nefario taught english in China, tried to vacation in the US and got denied by customs, and worked on a low salary as a sacrifice to the Bitcoin community. Even if most of the people he serviced were scammers (the issuers of GLBSE stock), personally I don't see him as a scammer. He was someone who had a series of bad ideas.

Also try to keep in mind that he has a family who he is responsible for during all this mess, and I doubt that was easy. I wish nefario the best as he reestablishes his programming career. He may find his idea of establishing a legit bitcoin stock market is impossible, and has to return to the corporate work world.
hero member
Activity: 868
Merit: 1000
October 27, 2012, 11:52:05 PM

I think nefario should name the guys that hold the money not theirs but are from other users. Keeping other glbse-users money isnt showing the best character. And they should at least now know that keeping it will in no way put pressure on nefario. Its not his money so...

I think James should stop using any remaining unreturned funds as an excuse for not putting asset-issuers and their users in contact with one another.  until he does that, he has no credibility whatsoever.  He's hardly in a position to take the moral high ground over unreturned funds when he's the one who is holding information which has nothing to do with his overpayment fuck-up hostage.

And if 3/4 of the overpayments have been returned then GLBSE should now have sufficient funds to make the remaining payments - they can do it out of the already returned overpayments and their own reserves.  James is the one trying to pressure people, not the reverse..  He is the one who loses if those funds aren't returned because there'll be no funds left to pay his salary/lawyer/weed bill/whatever.  He's acting out of pure self-interest here.

Naming and shaming people who haven't returned over-payments doesn't prove that they are holding the money of other users.  Nefario could only prove that by giving a complete financial accounting of BTC on hand and amounts still owed to users and I doubt there's anyone here who would trust any numbers he published because there's absolutely no way to verify them - he's not even letting the other shareholders verify what he's doing and could be paying his friends triple what they're owed for all you know.

All Nefario's SuperSekrit Stalled Until Further Notice repayment plan is likely to do is piss people off enough that they'll rain down upon him the very kind of legal problems he hoped to avoid by closing down GLBSE in the first place.
hero member
Activity: 616
Merit: 500
Portland Bitcoin Group Organizer
October 27, 2012, 11:31:44 PM
I think LG has a point here. There is absolutely no reason to trust Nefario. I'll be glad when this all wraps up. He sure is taking his sweet time.
hero member
Activity: 658
Merit: 500
October 27, 2012, 10:56:48 PM
Because he already did?

And nefario isnt like pirate. He already paid a good bunch of money back. I never heard that pirate did this or any other scammer. It would hurt their scammearnings. So nefario isnt a scammer of this kind. He only handles this all not very well. If he really would be a scammer the only earning he could have get would be the user money lying on glbse. But he paid back already a good part. The assets are of no worth to him. So no earning from there too.

I think nefario should name the guys that hold the money not theirs but are from other users. Keeping other glbse-users money isnt showing the best character. And they should at least now know that keeping it will in no way put pressure on nefario. Its not his money so...

Sebastian- with all due respect, you are wrong. James has made token payments of less than 10% of the cash value that is owed out there, and has now conceived this convenient "double payment" storyline to cover for why he is not taking further action. He is just trying to find the balls to make off with the rest and deciding if it is enough to live a life on the run. The only name that matters is James McCarthy. Who he may have sent payments to or not is irrelevant and not an excuse for holding anyone's money. Just as it is equally wrong for the other GLBSE/BitcoinGlobal owners to hold the money that they have and not make refunds with it.
I wonder why anyone should take your post seriously considering there is nothing with proof and wasn't theorised on the go as you wrote.

Tin foil much?
legendary
Activity: 2674
Merit: 1083
Legendary Escrow Service - Tip Jar in Profile
October 27, 2012, 08:39:07 PM
At least asicminer didnt get their money yet friedcat says. And its probably not a small amount. I wonder whats the amount of btc already paid out and what the initial amount was that had to be paid out.
hero member
Activity: 742
Merit: 500
Its as easy as 0, 1, 1, 2, 3
October 27, 2012, 08:32:19 PM
I didn't but there are people with balances much higher than mine owed.
vip
Activity: 1316
Merit: 1043
👻
October 27, 2012, 08:15:14 PM
Wait what? There are people who haven't being paid?

I got my coins...
legendary
Activity: 2674
Merit: 1083
Legendary Escrow Service - Tip Jar in Profile
October 27, 2012, 08:00:30 PM
Because he already did?

And nefario isnt like pirate. He already paid a good bunch of money back. I never heard that pirate did this or any other scammer. It would hurt their scammearnings. So nefario isnt a scammer of this kind. He only handles this all not very well. If he really would be a scammer the only earning he could have get would be the user money lying on glbse. But he paid back already a good part. The assets are of no worth to him. So no earning from there too.

I think nefario should name the guys that hold the money not theirs but are from other users. Keeping other glbse-users money isnt showing the best character. And they should at least now know that keeping it will in no way put pressure on nefario. Its not his money so...
Pirate did repay a few people back within a couple weeks of "closing up." There's not much hard evidence aside a few people claiming they were repaid, some of them pretty trustworthy. I'd assume it was meant to boost confidence and buy extra time before lawsuits were filed.

Didnt know that. At least it would be a wise move to pay some trustworthy members because the others believe them. So he can buy time.
hero member
Activity: 728
Merit: 500
In cryptography we trust
October 27, 2012, 06:13:28 PM
Because he already did?

And nefario isnt like pirate. He already paid a good bunch of money back. I never heard that pirate did this or any other scammer. It would hurt their scammearnings. So nefario isnt a scammer of this kind. He only handles this all not very well. If he really would be a scammer the only earning he could have get would be the user money lying on glbse. But he paid back already a good part. The assets are of no worth to him. So no earning from there too.

I think nefario should name the guys that hold the money not theirs but are from other users. Keeping other glbse-users money isnt showing the best character. And they should at least now know that keeping it will in no way put pressure on nefario. Its not his money so...

Sebastian- with all due respect, you are wrong. James has made token payments of less than 10% of the cash value that is owed out there, and has now conceived this convenient "double payment" storyline to cover for why he is not taking further action. He is just trying to find the balls to make off with the rest and deciding if it is enough to live a life on the run. The only name that matters is James McCarthy. Who he may have sent payments to or not is irrelevant and not an excuse for holding anyone's money. Just as it is equally wrong for the other GLBSE/BitcoinGlobal owners to hold the money that they have and not make refunds with it.

+1

Interesting, I read somewhere that he has already received 3/4 of double payments back. Loup says he only paid 10% so far, so that means that he "only" lost about 2.5% of the total money that GLBSE was holding for its customers. Correct me if I'm wrong.

There is no reason I can think of, why this loss would have to stall the whole process.

Whether an eventual loss is going to be made up by James McCarthy or by the whole GLBSE team is their business.

The only reason I can think of why he is stalling for weeks now is that he is an arrogant lowlife. I cannot imagine why at this point there are still people who do not want to stick a huge pole up his ass, unless he likes it, in which case there would be other options. I am willing to give advise through PM.
sr. member
Activity: 574
Merit: 250
October 27, 2012, 05:55:36 PM
Because he already did?

And nefario isnt like pirate. He already paid a good bunch of money back. I never heard that pirate did this or any other scammer. It would hurt their scammearnings. So nefario isnt a scammer of this kind. He only handles this all not very well. If he really would be a scammer the only earning he could have get would be the user money lying on glbse. But he paid back already a good part. The assets are of no worth to him. So no earning from there too.

I think nefario should name the guys that hold the money not theirs but are from other users. Keeping other glbse-users money isnt showing the best character. And they should at least now know that keeping it will in no way put pressure on nefario. Its not his money so...

Sebastian- with all due respect, you are wrong. James has made token payments of less than 10% of the cash value that is owed out there, and has now conceived this convenient "double payment" storyline to cover for why he is not taking further action. He is just trying to find the balls to make off with the rest and deciding if it is enough to live a life on the run. The only name that matters is James McCarthy. Who he may have sent payments to or not is irrelevant and not an excuse for holding anyone's money. Just as it is equally wrong for the other GLBSE/BitcoinGlobal owners to hold the money that they have and not make refunds with it.
donator
Activity: 1218
Merit: 1015
October 27, 2012, 05:44:46 PM
Because he already did?

And nefario isnt like pirate. He already paid a good bunch of money back. I never heard that pirate did this or any other scammer. It would hurt their scammearnings. So nefario isnt a scammer of this kind. He only handles this all not very well. If he really would be a scammer the only earning he could have get would be the user money lying on glbse. But he paid back already a good part. The assets are of no worth to him. So no earning from there too.

I think nefario should name the guys that hold the money not theirs but are from other users. Keeping other glbse-users money isnt showing the best character. And they should at least now know that keeping it will in no way put pressure on nefario. Its not his money so...
Pirate did repay a few people back within a couple weeks of "closing up." There's not much hard evidence aside a few people claiming they were repaid, some of them pretty trustworthy. I'd assume it was meant to boost confidence and buy extra time before lawsuits were filed.
legendary
Activity: 2674
Merit: 1083
Legendary Escrow Service - Tip Jar in Profile
October 27, 2012, 05:04:41 PM
Because he already did?

And nefario isnt like pirate. He already paid a good bunch of money back. I never heard that pirate did this or any other scammer. It would hurt their scammearnings. So nefario isnt a scammer of this kind. He only handles this all not very well. If he really would be a scammer the only earning he could have get would be the user money lying on glbse. But he paid back already a good part. The assets are of no worth to him. So no earning from there too.

I think nefario should name the guys that hold the money not theirs but are from other users. Keeping other glbse-users money isnt showing the best character. And they should at least now know that keeping it will in no way put pressure on nefario. Its not his money so...
legendary
Activity: 2142
Merit: 1009
Newbie
October 27, 2012, 04:44:09 PM
Zhou Tong, Pirate, Nefario... Why someone expects they r interested in replying on this forum?
legendary
Activity: 2674
Merit: 1083
Legendary Escrow Service - Tip Jar in Profile
October 27, 2012, 04:30:22 PM
Cool... i dont get angry... no... i DONT GET ANGRY... ... ... *cough*... im silent... silent... 10... 9...
hero member
Activity: 728
Merit: 500
In cryptography we trust
October 27, 2012, 03:54:47 PM
Next day is gone... nothing happened... nefario... what are you doing at the moment???

More stalling, denying responsibility and ignoring customers:

Quote
UPDATE: Currently recovering bitcoin payments made in error, account closing has been halted until most of this has been recovered

Source: http://glbse.com

What a lowlife.
legendary
Activity: 2674
Merit: 1083
Legendary Escrow Service - Tip Jar in Profile
October 27, 2012, 03:50:50 PM
Next day is gone... nothing happened... nefario... what are you doing at the moment???
newbie
Activity: 27
Merit: 0
October 26, 2012, 12:17:52 AM
still got nothing, no email, no bitcoin.

Check your spam folder, that's where my e-mail ended up.
no email in my spam folder
hero member
Activity: 658
Merit: 500
October 25, 2012, 07:19:25 PM
There is no legitimate, lawful reason for Nefario to make the provision of user information to asset-issuers contingent upon the return of all over payments.  None.  According to other shareholders, BG has a small amount of BTC reserves of its own.  Those reserves should be used to top-up any short-fall in returned funds and after that if there's still a short-fall then Nefario should be buying the required BTC with his credit card.

It's pretty obvious that Nefario doesn't want GLBSE's own funds used to top-up any short-fall because he still wants to be paid for last month's work from those funds.

At this point, I hope there's a UK asset issuer who's willing to take legal proceedings to compel him to hand over their user list.  The onus would be on Nefario to provide a good reason for not doing so and any judge would laugh at him if he pulled the "waiting for overpayments to be returned" bullshit.
in general there is not many laws that dictate how an illegal should be ran....

And no matter where he takes the money from of means less money in his pockets so its all the same.

What's more greedy after all, feeding of an error or trying to make so people get they are owed from the funds for that purpose?

Dude, wake up and smell the coffee:
There are general laws abiding by moral values.

Mr. James McCarthy has the moral obligation to return whatever is left after his fucked up decision to close shop - doesn't matter whether the shop is illegal or not.
Remember "poor" James was making a buck on this, he's not a philantropic ONG, he's responsible and by not stanidng up to his responsibilities he's been labelled as scum a scammer.

Greed is not the question here. I invested on legit mining businesses, not on a fucking 6% a week pyrascam. Everyone has the right to have their share back and Nef has to provide. If someone in the UK takes the step, will be chipping in to make sure he is fucked over legally even if I don't get shit back. Just for the moral principle.
my post was saying just that. Stop talking about laws within an illegitimate business. What people refer to "illegal" in most cases are applied to legitimate businesses. At this point we talk about moral values. And if you wanna talk about illegal, talk about the fact of opening that business... which honestly, no one really minded when it was profiting them and they had nefario as their scapegoat
Pages:
Jump to: