Topic: [NEM] NEM -New Economy Movement - No Envy Movement - Updates+Discussion thread - page 367. (Read 661525 times)

I think his opinion should not in any way effect his stake in NEM development. Just because someone doesn't like the company, it didn't mean they cannot own/purchase any shares. What he did is part of the ecosystem, even in an organization you can find someone highly negativity still working in it. Because they have interest, awe, doesn't have choices, don't want to be left behind. Whatever the reasons, I think he/she should be entitled to their opinion regardless of their stake. It's just a tiny %, and is good for marketing too.  

Btw, not everything he/she said is true. As utopianfuture said, at this moment, NEM system is totally rewrite from scratch and will includes many other functions that other crypto don't have. So...

got it, thanks.

Direct quote from 2kool4skewl (link: https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.5240892):

That's it for me with 2kool4skewl. You know before I wrote that he would be a valuable member to this community, but it's time to face facts: 2kool4skewl is denouncing NEM in many threads. After this he can not just simply say that he was only questioning NEM. He is trying to make it look bad!

I want him removed as a stakeholder. There can not possibly be any value in having a stakeholder among us who is going around and telling people that NEM is a waste of money and that it is created only by envious people trying to feed their greed.

Now I am suggesting a democratic vote on behalf of the community to remove 2kool4skewl from the stakeholder list. This will end any possible accusations made against Utopian future for removing 2kool4skewl about him being a dictator. The community has the right to remove members that it does not want to have!

You can vote about him being a member of the community here: https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/2kool4skewl-as-a-member-on-nem-community-480290

The vote will be open for the next 3 days. After this the community will have made it's decision, no matter the result of the vote.

Just thought I'd show my face around here.......sorry I haven't been all that active since the start-up, but it looks like u guys are doing fine without me.  

So: hi, guys, keep up the good work!

Hello Nemunity,  this is my suggestion for a NEM LOGO,

i created it last night, maybe you like it. All colours can be changed.



@randombit

http://www.bildercache.de/bild/20140221-180553-357.png

Please klick link to see it in full size.

Greetings

ournem.com is now online!

looks good!

NEM to da moon..

Does someone tried to put in graph the forging system scheme?

I didn't understand very well the forge system...(detailed at the nem development plan)

thanks a lot!!!

If you re-write the NEM code completely,how do the NXT develop? Out of circulation or any other plan?

There are two points everyone should understand.

1. The development team did not sell NEM stakes or actively looked for passive investors during the fundraising; This is the purpose of the fundraising "We are looking for active participants that can help NEM in particular and the decentralized network culture in general" . There were fee /promotional condition to participate in NEM and when we have an unified group of stakeholders we will divide all NEM (minus development shares) equally to all stakeholders. In essence, the goal of the fundraising process is to build the community and funding that can help to move the NEM platform forward.

2. This is the disclaimer applying for the fundraising "While we are committed to the idea of "Fair Distribution - Equal Shares for ALL "; the fund raising terms are subject to changes upon the discretion of the development team."

These are taken "words by words" from the fundraising page. If you misunderstood these terms by the time of registration or now disagree with them, you are now free to leave and I will refund what you contributed in.

There are a plenty of associations out there and you are free to leave this one and join what you like, and yes based on the disclaimer the development team has the power to not accept a certain account in our stakeholder list.

Def cool, very smart looking and not to over the top.......

Yeah I'm in love with this logo. It's professional and instantly recognisable.

The stakeholder list in a google sheet listed in the front page of this thread. Bookmark the front page as the updates will be there as well.

Condition Y = okie; blank = not qualified. As described in the fundrasing process, registration in each page has to send in the fee or satisfy a NEM promotion condition. Accounts without condition =Y did not satify these above mentioned conditions and therefore not qualified.

Y means that everythings OK

Will the stakeholder list be posted here or your website? What does the "without Y" mean?

I have some technical issues with the host site. Should be resolved today.

Hi Guys!

My signature done

Some of the details are still being worked out around POI. But, the current thinking is as follows:
- The transaction graph is based on account numbers - not IP addresses or devices
- There *may* be extra forging power given to an account that is forging on multiple nodes (in order to reward the network backbone, which was the initial idea behind PON; an account forging on 2 nodes should be more important than the same account forging on one node)

And, NXT reminds me of an oligarchy :


But, either way, I think it' s a stretch to connect cryptocurrencies to political structures.