people are seeking a true fair equal distribution
That's impossible.
How it's different:
1) More $, more % you'll own;
2) No enough BTT-activity, good bye (and good enough activty on your multiple accs, more % you'll own, ofc)?
Wow, cryptopost
Please explain your message since this is not entirely clear to me...
There's no way to achieve equal distrubution on people basis with pseudoanonymous system.
In Nxt u could "cheat" claiming stake with more BTCs (with 1 BTC cap) and with even more BTCs from different BTT-accs, in NEM u could claim more % of NEMs having more active accs if "newbie-protection" 'd activated. Otherwise, u can claim more NEMs, creating accs and sending fees.
Is there objective difference in fairness between Nxt and NEM? Nope. Cos there's no such thing as objective fair. It could be or could be not more fair
in people minds to divide Genesis to 3k accs instead of 73 (goal was in BTCs: 21) with "growing from 0 relatively small fee for equal share" rule instead of "up to 1 BTC proportional to BTCs sent stake" rule. I can't read multiple mindsets (especially combined and in dynamics), so I participating in both projects (as potential user+forger(+datakeeper) and current forger) and watching.