Topic: NEM (XEM) Official Thread - 100% New Code - Easy To Use APIs - page 1037. (Read 2985436 times)

I think he wants to say: both NIS and NCC have remote APIS so you can run your business logic elsewhere in a private network.

BTC went doesn and everything follows. Not exactly a new paradigm.

What caused the price drop?

Hi Pat,

Yes I've made this info graph! Thanks for the compliment. The point which we are unsertain about was input given by Lon. I just put it in there because it seemed he had a case. I have to be honost that I really didn't get it aswell, hence is why I asked him a question about it and he gave me the reply above. As the info graphic should contain feedback from the community, I've put that in there.
So I'm not really able to elaborate on that. Maybe you could ask Lon about that.

The rest will be updated!

This is true. I'm not the most active and have been gone for awhile, but NEM is impressive. Slow and steady. No pump, flash in the pan, etc.

It will stand the test of time, and stand out more as time passes.

NEM should interest everybody. It is really a remarkably stable and well-designed platform

Waiting and being exited about this release. Hope this will raise the awarness for NEM in times where there is a countercoin (BitcoinXT) to Bitcoin 

so it fills at least the Bitcointalksites of a coin which interest nobody.
(This should be no trolling -i am also invested in NEM-, but reality...)

Sounds great, I hope something will come out of this!

The first stage has not finished yet. The Community will have decided if Crypto Apex Inc. has passed quorum or not at around 7pm London time today. The result should be known tomorrow.

Ultimately the Core Member team decides if and when funds would be given out for any project seeking funding.
 

I have a question about Crypto Apex Inc., when the funding will start?

Wuut ? Could you elaborate on why it's hard to track where it's coming from and why this is so secure ?

Something else I noticed. The graphic says that the most active nodes are being rewarded. This is incorrect. It should say the most active accounts are rewarded or rather more important.

Lastly, imho wether NIS is run remote or local doesn't pertain to how "hot" the wallet is.

btw did you make that graphic? Good job ! Looks really nice.

Thank you! It isn't that easy as you think btw


Actually Lon gave me some feedback @ Telegram on the info graphic and here is his reply to my same question:

If you understand tiered architecture design, applications can all hide behind a firewall and talk to any NIS. Hence it is masked. It is hard, but not impossible for anyone to track where the application solution is coming from. This method of design is commonly known as stealth mode.

From security standpoint, you don't need expensive security solutions to run this sort of set up. It saves a lot of money on both hardware and software.

Programming in terms of hardening the solution is also made simpler.

Hacking is very much reduced to insider job, which is very much the same as many solutions with hardened security.

While we are at it, this website is a classic example of how NEM is so much simpler. http://documentation.colu.co/

In there you will see that a programmer is very much dependent on colu.co to provide the API. In our case, most are embedded in NEM. APIs for NEM are publicly available.

NEM has already much of what colu has done. For anyone to do a colu equivalent, the person will have to develop that again before he can start working on his proprietary solution.

NEM is open for all to do whatever they want to do. Hope you see the difference.

Essentially NEM has taken away and made redundant colu.

Colu, counterparty and Omni are classic examples of a layer on BTC. NEM won't have those entities as that layer is inside it already. If at all, it will be system integrators coming in to the mother of all these redundant entities and program applications directly instead.

I can't understand what does it means

Very nice graphic and easy to understand. 
I think a lot of these graphics programs can be downloaded for free on Google but the trouble isn't making them but making an informed and correct comparison between NEM and another project.

https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/the-20-throwdown-thread-1153740

Most of us need threads like the above and hope the information about the other projects are correct.

And I'm very glad to see that not all devs are infected. It's good to see a project like NEM with a better balanced approach.

How convenient 

Bitcoin core dev calls PoW stupid and says he hopes we find something better someday.  Glad to see maximalism hasn't infected everybody.  https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RIafZXRDH7w

hahahaha, I remember when Gimre use to tell me "you got to make things shorter if you want people to read them," but I can't.  There is just too much going on in NEM, and lots more that I want to write about but haven't got the okay yet so it could have been even longer!