No a resolution implies a nailed down solution.
What there currently is two consensus camps.
People who were actually here for the past 9 months and regularly contributed to discussion seem to want the same things (such as keeping any unclaimed stakes for an investment asset to help grow the NEM ecosystem for the long term).
Then people who were largely AWOL until 9 days ago who are effectively saying: "gimmie more NEM". I'm not necessarily against the latter, even spoke out in favor of it in one post, but wouldn't do much for NEM after 3 months.. it's an appeasement..
I feel like you're confusing me with someone else. My original position was to let people keep what they paid for and keep distribution unchanged. In other words, don't rock the boat. But I'm sympathetic (and I think others are to) to arguments that this is a burden to the devs and could lead to other kinds of dumps later, so I'm open to the % service fee idea that gradually works off unclaimed stakes over a few months (which minimises distributional disruption and mitigates market fears of quick, big dumps) and distribute according to some of the fair proposals made. But my #1 choice was always not to rock the boat and take from people what they paid for.
I've said my peace on this and hope the devs do not make a decision that weakens NEM's brand image.
