Author

Topic: NEM (XEM) Official Thread - 100% New Code - Easy To Use APIs - page 579. (Read 2985369 times)

pgb
full member
Activity: 212
Merit: 100
nem wallet dark skin


Looks great!! only thing I don't like is the pics at the bottom corners, but that's just me.
sr. member
Activity: 359
Merit: 250
multisignature  Shocked

sr. member
Activity: 359
Merit: 250
nem wallet dark skin
hero member
Activity: 1022
Merit: 507
I send 30 000 xem from nanowallet, to poloniex. Block was already opened. Money retiremented from nanowallet 2 hours ago. But didn't come to poloniex. Said, please where should I write to pay back xem

Search for your transaction on here: See if it went to correct address:

http://chain.nem.ninja/#/blocks/0

Number of transaction 1030856. nbhl6v-hsapkr-2jkoa7-uqxatf-leye2r-b3hbvd-neus  is not my wallet. Does 30 000 xem went on it? NBZMQO7ZPBYNBDUR7F75MAKA2S3DHDCIFG775N3D - my wallet (3 xem). I forgot write message in transaction. Advise please how pay back nem?

NBZMQO7ZPBYNBDUR7F75MAKA2S3DHDCIFG775N3D is probably Poloniex address
http://chain.nem.ninja/#/search/NBZMQO7ZPBYNBDUR7F75MAKA2S3DHDCIFG775N3D

try to contact their support
full member
Activity: 235
Merit: 110
HAVUJA PERKELE!
I send 30 000 xem from nanowallet, to poloniex. Block was already opened. Money retiremented from nanowallet 2 hours ago. But didn't come to poloniex. Said, please where should I write to pay back xem

Search for your transaction on here: See if it went to correct address:

http://chain.nem.ninja/#/blocks/0

Number of transaction 1030856. nbhl6v-hsapkr-2jkoa7-uqxatf-leye2r-b3hbvd-neus  is not my wallet. Does 30 000 xem went on it? NBZMQO7ZPBYNBDUR7F75MAKA2S3DHDCIFG775N3D - my wallet (3 xem). I forgot write message in transaction. Advise please how pay back nem?

It is on crypto space without unique message. Ask help fom polo with your above details.
legendary
Activity: 1418
Merit: 1002
The purpose of linking a private blockchain (Mijin) to a public blockchain (NEM) is for immutability. A private blockchain has a central authority which can alter that blockchain at their discretion. Linking it to a public chain which is immutable due to it's decentralized nature solves that problem and you get best of both worlds.
Thanks for the explanation. If I understand correctly, it is still up to the company running the private blockchain to decide whether or not they want to leverage the public blockchain by linking the two. Immutability in this case could still be achieved by running the private blockchain on multitude of nodes effectively making them decentralized—although it would not be as reliable as linking to a public blockchain.

Mijin is a great 1-2 punch, as it gets the foot in the door, and once the company sees the power of mijin, a switch/link to NEM is much easier and they will be more comfortable having already worked with mijin.  of course not all companies will use the public chain, but even a small percentage can be huge.

Companies are much more willing to test with a private chain they control than jumping right in with a public chain.  This 1-2 business model is actually very genius in my mind, and every company that tests with mijin is indirectly exposed to NEM.
hero member
Activity: 1022
Merit: 507
I send 30 000 xem from nanowallet, to poloniex. Block was already opened. Money retiremented from nanowallet 2 hours ago. But didn't come to poloniex. Said, please where should I write to pay back xem

Did you use a message as instructed in Poloniex deposit form?

They say "You MUST send your deposit using the unique Message above. Failure to do so may result in the loss of your deposit."
hero member
Activity: 491
Merit: 514
Thanks for the explanation. If I understand correctly, it is still up to the company running the private blockchain to decide whether or not they want to leverage the public blockchain by linking the two.

Yes, not all private chains will want immutability but many will which is a very valuable feature.

Immutability in this case could still be achieved by running the private blockchain on multitude of nodes effectively making them decentralized—although it would not be as reliable as linking to a public blockchain.

In a private blockchain, a single entity controls all of the nodes so they would be able to change the blockchain at their discretion so immutability is not possible without a decentralized public block chain to anchor to.
sr. member
Activity: 382
Merit: 256
I send 30 000 xem from nanowallet, to poloniex. Block was already opened. Money retiremented from nanowallet 2 hours ago. But didn't come to poloniex. Said, please where should I write to pay back xem

Search for your transaction on here: See if it went to correct address:

http://chain.nem.ninja/#/blocks/0
member
Activity: 79
Merit: 10
Thanks! I will try that!  Smiley
hero member
Activity: 687
Merit: 500
Hello.

My NIS is not synching and I am 22 Days behind. I don't know what to do. Has anyone the same problem?

Here is my log:
2017-03-20 14:00:58.090 INFORMATION failed to synchronize with Node [Hi, I am Alice6 ] @ [108.61.168.86]: org.nem.core.connect.FatalPeerException: remote node is evil: REMOTE_RETURNED_INVALID_HASHES (org.nem.nis.BlockChain a)
Does anyone know what I can do about it?

I have the latest version 0.6.84.

Thanks in advance!

Your node is on a deep fork. Either sync from scratch or download a recent db from Bob:

bob.nem.ninja/nis5_mainnet-1002k.h2.db.zip
member
Activity: 79
Merit: 10
Hello.

My NIS is not synching and I am 22 Days behind. I don't know what to do. Has anyone the same problem?

Here is my log:
java.util.concurrent.CompletionException: org.nem.core.connect.FatalPeerException: org.apache.http.ConnectionClosedException: Connection closed
   at java.util.concurrent.CompletableFuture.encodeThrowable(CompletableFuture.java:292)
   at java.util.concurrent.CompletableFuture.completeThrowable(CompletableFuture.java:308)
   at java.util.concurrent.CompletableFuture.uniApply(CompletableFuture.java:593)
   at java.util.concurrent.CompletableFuture$UniApply.tryFire(CompletableFuture.java:577)
   at java.util.concurrent.CompletableFuture.postComplete(CompletableFuture.java:474)
   at java.util.concurrent.CompletableFuture.completeExceptionally(CompletableFuture.java:1977)
   at org.nem.core.connect.HttpMethodClient$HttpMethodClientFutureCallback.failed(HttpMethodClient.java:201)
   at org.apache.http.concurrent.BasicFuture.failed(BasicFuture.java:134)
   at org.apache.http.impl.nio.client.AbstractClientExchangeHandler.failed(AbstractClientExchangeHandler.java:419)
   at org.apache.http.nio.protocol.HttpAsyncRequestExecutor.endOfInput(HttpAsyncRequestExecutor.java:341)
   at org.apache.http.impl.nio.DefaultNHttpClientConnection.consumeInput(DefaultNHttpClientConnection.java:263)
   at org.apache.http.impl.nio.client.InternalIODispatch.onInputReady(InternalIODispatch.java:81)
   at org.apache.http.impl.nio.client.InternalIODispatch.onInputReady(InternalIODispatch.java:39)
   at org.apache.http.impl.nio.reactor.AbstractIODispatch.inputReady(AbstractIODispatch.java:116)
   at org.apache.http.impl.nio.reactor.BaseIOReactor.readable(BaseIOReactor.java:164)
   at org.apache.http.impl.nio.reactor.AbstractIOReactor.processEvent(AbstractIOReactor.java:339)
   at org.apache.http.impl.nio.reactor.AbstractIOReactor.processEvents(AbstractIOReactor.java:317)
   at org.apache.http.impl.nio.reactor.AbstractIOReactor.execute(AbstractIOReactor.java:278)
   at org.apache.http.impl.nio.reactor.BaseIOReactor.execute(BaseIOReactor.java:106)
   at org.apache.http.impl.nio.reactor.AbstractMultiworkerIOReactor$Worker.run(AbstractMultiworkerIOReactor.java:590)
   at java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:745)
Caused by: org.nem.core.connect.FatalPeerException: org.apache.http.ConnectionClosedException: Connection closed
   at org.nem.core.connect.HttpMethodClient$HttpMethodClientFutureCallback.wrapException(HttpMethodClient.java:210)
   ... 15 more
Caused by: org.apache.http.ConnectionClosedException: Connection closed
   ... 12 more
 (org.nem.core.async.NemAsyncTimerVisitor notifyOperationCompleteExceptionally)
2017-03-20 14:00:55.884 INFORMATION Time synchronization: found 11 nodes to synchronize with. (org.nem.nis.time.synchronization.NisTimeSynchronizer synchronizeTime)
2017-03-20 14:00:56.344 INFORMATION NC2ZQKEFQIL3JZEOB2OZPWXWPOR6LKYHIROCR7PK: network time offset to local node is -20ms (org.nem.nis.time.synchronization.DefaultTimeSynchronizationStrategy a)
2017-03-20 14:00:56.344 INFORMATION NC5A7OIVQ6YNXDWY6656MBCS4IYZNQTB6EWMYZHS: network time offset to local node is -15ms (org.nem.nis.time.synchronization.DefaultTimeSynchronizationStrategy a)
2017-03-20 14:00:56.344 INFORMATION NCZ6YBREMON6BP5X4M7KOMKPV6JW6YY2SHB3RJ7D: network time offset to local node is -14ms (org.nem.nis.time.synchronization.DefaultTimeSynchronizationStrategy a)
2017-03-20 14:00:56.345 INFORMATION NAE5VJB76PIR6FWO3FYSCRD7F7NWUSKBGFX3EVW6: network time offset to local node is -11ms (org.nem.nis.time.synchronization.DefaultTimeSynchronizationStrategy a)
2017-03-20 14:00:56.345 INFORMATION NBCYZ7REMOHQAASWEUDWE3NV35SU4P4XQOZC7MQQ: network time offset to local node is -6ms (org.nem.nis.time.synchronization.DefaultTimeSynchronizationStrategy a)
2017-03-20 14:00:56.345 INFORMATION NCL63DFN3TD5RUDVEMPTHSAUHZFDCTXFOW6KFV7J: network time offset to local node is -6ms (org.nem.nis.time.synchronization.DefaultTimeSynchronizationStrategy a)
2017-03-20 14:00:56.345 INFORMATION NA76OOREMOGJYHUKH4SU7OS73456L35J7NOIJWQM: network time offset to local node is 9ms (org.nem.nis.time.synchronization.DefaultTimeSynchronizationStrategy a)
2017-03-20 14:00:56.763 INFORMATION synchronizing with Node [Hi, I am Alice6 ] @ [108.61.168.86] (org.nem.peer.services.NodeSynchronizer b)
2017-03-20 14:00:58.090 INFORMATION failed to synchronize with Node [Hi, I am Alice6 ] @ [108.61.168.86]: org.nem.core.connect.FatalPeerException: remote node is evil: REMOTE_RETURNED_INVALID_HASHES (org.nem.nis.BlockChain a)
2017-03-20 14:00:58.090 INFORMATION synchronizing with Node [Hi, I am Alice6 ] @ [108.61.168.86] finished (org.nem.peer.services.NodeSynchronizer b)
2017-03-20 14:00:58.090 INFORMATION Updating experience with Node [Hi, I am Alice6 ] @ [108.61.168.86]: FAILURE (org.nem.peer.PeerNetworkState a)

Does anyone know what I can do about it?

I have the latest version 0.6.84.

Thanks in advance!
legendary
Activity: 1666
Merit: 1020
expect(brain).toHaveBeenUsed()
Hello ,
           How long we can keep my nem coins in Exchange ?...



Thanks,
Shiva

until the exchange is hacked ;-)
member
Activity: 131
Merit: 10
Hello ,
           How long we can keep my nem coins in Exchange ?...



Thanks,
Shiva
hero member
Activity: 687
Merit: 500
You can ask the owner of a supernode to add your private delegated harvesting key to his/her NIS config as additional harvester, then it will be automatically harvesting upon every restart of NIS.

I want to try adding my XEM to a supernode too, where or who can I possibly contact someone that can add my xem to his/her supernode?

You can PM me.
hero member
Activity: 619
Merit: 500
Go Bitcoin
better keep a record of the PRIV KEY too + the wallet (*.wlt) file.

maybe write it down somewhere in a piece of paper Smiley

goodluck sir!
full member
Activity: 215
Merit: 116
Why so serious?
When I export wallet from NEM client its backuped and I can restore it on the other PC? Or do I still need to copy over files from user/data etc..

legendary
Activity: 1946
Merit: 1007
The purpose of linking a private blockchain (Mijin) to a public blockchain (NEM) is for immutability. A private blockchain has a central authority which can alter that blockchain at their discretion. Linking it to a public chain which is immutable due to it's decentralized nature solves that problem and you get best of both worlds.
Thanks for the explanation. If I understand correctly, it is still up to the company running the private blockchain to decide whether or not they want to leverage the public blockchain by linking the two. Immutability in this case could still be achieved by running the private blockchain on multitude of nodes effectively making them decentralized—although it would not be as reliable as linking to a public blockchain.

Running it on a multitude of nodes does not make something decentralized if you control all of those nodes.

I guess the idea with linking is that you can make it decentralized without handing out control over your nodes, thus keeping control over your own chain while it is still immutable.
member
Activity: 73
Merit: 10
Be a NEMber- nem.io

or he can use remote harvesting from super-node but he have to remember that nodes are restarted from time to time.
So after every new release he will have to activate harvesting somewhere on node where are slots available.
Whole process is plain simple.
1) activate dlegated harvesting
2) find supernode with slots
3) run remote harvesting Smiley
Costs 6XEM + repeat process every new release

Where do you check for free slots?
And that kinda sucks if you have to reactivate on every new release.

You can ask the owner of a supernode to add your private delegated harvesting key to his/her NIS config as additional harvester, then it will be automatically harvesting upon every restart of NIS.

I want to try adding my XEM to a supernode too, where or who can I possibly contact someone that can add my xem to his/her supernode?
Jump to: