- "Whoever has knowledge of a private key has full control over the associated funds", which implies that if somebody is somehow able to guess your passwords he or she has only full access to your funds if they have access to the wallet file? So that's pretty safe right?
- Somebody who is able to guess your key has by definition access to all your funds? I think this is risky, especially with the coming quantum computers. I think it would be better if a key alone is not enough to hack all your funds. Or am I missing something?
If your able to guess that key then the NSA will hire you no questions asked and pay whatever you want.
I was talking about quantum computers...not guessing...
NEMs wallets are no more or less secure than other cryptos right now.
You wanna worry about something ? Worry about this https://thehackernews.com/2015/10/nsa-crack-encryption.html
That puts your bank account at a whole lot more risk than your NEM wallet.
That's some scary sh%t ! The US is acting like a global dictatorship..
Indeed, and it's ironic really. A country that, thanks to their forefathers and them learning from their mistakes, their constitution helped further define liberty and prosperity.
With that in mind i can sympathize with those american citizens who are exercising their constitutional rights to bare arms, because it's purpose was a last line defense against a tyrannical government. Their forefathers even warned about a privatized bank/financial system and what havoc it would cause to the people, a system they (And the rest of the world) sadly live by today.
I know a guy who emigrated from the US to the EU because of the government already...
I get the sentiment, but what comes to mind there is "out of the frying pan and into the fire"
The EU's only claim to power is creating it's own currency (The Euro) and masquerading as a trade union. By forcing it's currency on politicians and nations it's expanded it's influence to now bully and harass nations to the point of what laws they should have and even, who should rule those countries.
The EU is far more sinister and dangerous, it empowers a few unaccountable, unelected people and is the biggest threat to individual liberty and democracy.
Nevertheless, I think there is no danger of one single tyrant controlling the masses, as long as prime ministers rule together I think there is peace. Political interests are more important than economic interests.
.......
Judging by what you've said there, i don't think you see the correlation between wealth and power. You can't have power without money and you cannot have money without power.
In addition, it's pointless if "politicians" rule together if they weren't elected by the people in the first place. Peace amongst politicians is irrelevent when it's the masses that rule.
What I meant to say is that political interests (peace) always prevail over economic interests (economic growth), the former is generally considered more important than the latter. I am not quite sure why you think politicians are not elected in the EU? We still have democracies, or are you referring to EU level government?