Pages:
Author

Topic: [NemosMiner] multi algo profit switching NVIDIA/CPU miner - page 21. (Read 289473 times)

member
Activity: 514
Merit: 11
Feature Request:

Add a separate wallet address line for Nicehash ONLY, so we can use Nicehash internal wallets and check box to trigger which fee we expect to pay so it can be added into the calculations to determine if more profitable vs other pools.



Story Behind the change:
I have been using NemoMiner over AwesomeMiner for some time now and recently upgraded to the new GUI versions on my rigs, i mainly mine to Ahashpool Plus, but i mistakenly forgot to turn off nicehash which was checked from default during install and found large periods that my Ahashpool showed huge drops in profits checking on it periodically, this boggled me as the rigs were online the entire time, but lastnight i figured out what it was, the nicehash box was checked and i overlooked this and copied the setup folder to my cloud drive so it would be downloaded on all of my rigs to later run... while on my PC and looking at my Ahashpool page i noticed that all 120+ GPU's were displayed not active miners all sudden and remoted into the rigs to check on them to find that they were mining on Nicehash. I have no issues with mining to Nicehash if it truly is more profitable than any algo on Ahashpool, just didnt expect it. The issue now is when i look at nicehash to check the payout, its sending me payments via external route and charging me 3%, if i was able to populate my internal wallet than i would incur 0% fee as i use coinbase.



This already available:
See here: https://github.com/MrPlusGH/NPlusMiner/blob/master/README.md

Per pools config (Advanced)

    - **This is for advanced users. Do not use if you do not know what you are doing.**
    - You can now set specific options per pool. For example, you can mine NiceHash on the internal wallet and other pools on a valid wallet. This configuration is provided as an example in Config\PoolsConfig-NHInternal.json
      - Available options
        - Wallet = your wallet address
        - UserName = your MPH user name
        - WorkerName = your worker name
        - PricePenaltyFactor = See explanation below
      - Usage
        - The file Config\PoolsConfig.json contains per pool configuration details. If a pool is listed in this file,
    the specific settings will be taken into account. If not, the setting for the entry name default will be used.
    **Do not delete the default entry.**
        - Edit Config\PoolsConfig.json
        - Add an entry for the pool you want to customize
          - The name must be the NPlusMiner name for the pool. ie. for ahashpool, if you use Plus. The name is ahashpoolplus.
          - (**careful with json formating Wink**)
          - Best way is to duplicate the default entry
    - Note that the GUI only updates the default entry. Any other changes need to be done manualy

PricePenaltyFactor (Advanced)

    - When using advanced per pool configuration, it is possible to add a penalty factor for a specific pool. This simply adds as a multiplicator on estimations presented by the pool.
    - Example scenario
      - NiceHash as a 4% fee - Set PricePenaltyFactor to 0.96 (1-0.04)
      - You feel like a pool is exaggerating his estimations by 10% - Set PricePenaltyFactor to 0.9

full member
Activity: 322
Merit: 233
Question:

In regards to mining to Nicehash, what are the default fee % that NemoMiner 3.1 is calculating in regards to profitability? is it offsetting the profits by 5%, 3%, 1%? or maybe is it ignoring this and just going off pure profit with no fee taken into account?
full member
Activity: 322
Merit: 233
Feature Request:

Add a separate wallet address line for Nicehash ONLY, so we can use Nicehash internal wallets and check box to trigger which fee we expect to pay so it can be added into the calculations to determine if more profitable vs other pools.



Story Behind the change:
I have been using NemoMiner over AwesomeMiner for some time now and recently upgraded to the new GUI versions on my rigs, i mainly mine to Ahashpool Plus, but i mistakenly forgot to turn off nicehash which was checked from default during install and found large periods that my Ahashpool showed huge drops in profits checking on it periodically, this boggled me as the rigs were online the entire time, but lastnight i figured out what it was, the nicehash box was checked and i overlooked this and copied the setup folder to my cloud drive so it would be downloaded on all of my rigs to later run... while on my PC and looking at my Ahashpool page i noticed that all 120+ GPU's were displayed not active miners all sudden and remoted into the rigs to check on them to find that they were mining on Nicehash. I have no issues with mining to Nicehash if it truly is more profitable than any algo on Ahashpool, just didnt expect it. The issue now is when i look at nicehash to check the payout, its sending me payments via external route and charging me 3%, if i was able to populate my internal wallet than i would incur 0% fee as i use coinbase.

jr. member
Activity: 154
Merit: 1
Curious what folks are earning with a single 1080ti and the new 3.1 software
averaged 0.0004 BTC

Thanks manc...That's a little better than I'm doing but I'm close!  You using plus or 24hr?

What settings and pool?=
My profits Average are 0.00049 BTC/Day with 2 1080TI 65%TDP On Zergpoolplus.

I'm wondering the same.
newbie
Activity: 85
Merit: 0
Curious what folks are earning with a single 1080ti and the new 3.1 software
averaged 0.0004 BTC

Thanks manc...That's a little better than I'm doing but I'm close!  You using plus or 24hr?

What settings and pool?=
My profits Average are 0.00049 BTC/Day with 2 1080TI 65%TDP On Zergpoolplus.
newbie
Activity: 27
Merit: 0
Tribus creep, thanks Nemo and JCS-CCT, algo was disabled. Now running v3.1 and Tribus is running fine.

Any idea as to why when selected hashrefinery balance and estimated pay date doesnt show up with the other pools that are selected?
Hin
newbie
Activity: 9
Merit: 0
Curious what folks are earning with a single 1080ti and the new 3.1 software
averaged 0.0004 BTC

Thanks manc...That's a little better than I'm doing but I'm close!  You using plus or 24hr?

any one with 4 1070ti? roughly how much will nemosminer made?
jr. member
Activity: 161
Merit: 1
Curious what folks are earning with a single 1080ti and the new 3.1 software
averaged 0.0004 BTC

Thanks manc...That's a little better than I'm doing but I'm close!  You using plus or 24hr?
newbie
Activity: 84
Merit: 0
Curious what folks are earning with a single 1080ti and the new 3.1 software
averaged 0.0004 BTC
jr. member
Activity: 161
Merit: 1
Curious what folks are earning with a single 1080ti and the new 3.1 software
jr. member
Activity: 154
Merit: 1

Thanks all,
BTW which pool is recomended?
is it better stick to one pool or more?


I like Zergpool.  Fine to have more than one pool, but keep in mind that the more you use, the longer it takes for payouts.

I prefer to stick to one pool.  There's nothing more annoying than bouncing back and forth between different pools on the same algo/coin.  Nemos, it would be awesome if we could somehow control this Smiley

You can increase the ActiveMinerGain% in the config tab to 10.  This will decrease switching.
https://github.com/MrPlusGH/NPlusMiner-Documentation/wiki/Config-tab-details

I actually have it set at 10% and it was sometimes a ping-pong battle between ahash and zerg on x17.  It probably wouldn't bee too difficult to implement... just add a condition to not switch to different pool on same algo, and make it an option.

Just asking, but why do you guys care how long does it take to get paid
even with 4 pools and not how much is your current profit?
How long makes sense only if you are changing to USD all the time
but if you save in BTC is not better to be more profitable ?
Thanks

IMO. More payouts reduce risk.  There are risks of pools loosing your profits.  There are risks of BTC crashing before payout.  I exchange to USD or a stable coin asap.
newbie
Activity: 10
Merit: 0

Thanks all,
BTW which pool is recomended?
is it better stick to one pool or more?


I like Zergpool.  Fine to have more than one pool, but keep in mind that the more you use, the longer it takes for payouts.

I prefer to stick to one pool.  There's nothing more annoying than bouncing back and forth between different pools on the same algo/coin.  Nemos, it would be awesome if we could somehow control this Smiley

You can increase the ActiveMinerGain% in the config tab to 10.  This will decrease switching.
https://github.com/MrPlusGH/NPlusMiner-Documentation/wiki/Config-tab-details

I actually have it set at 10% and it was sometimes a ping-pong battle between ahash and zerg on x17.  It probably wouldn't bee too difficult to implement... just add a condition to not switch to different pool on same algo, and make it an option.

Just asking, but why do you guys care how long does it take to get paid
even with 4 pools and not how much is your current profit?
How long makes sense only if you are changing to USD all the time
but if you save in BTC is not better to be more profitable ?
Thanks

I personally don't care.  I care more about the downtime and ramp-up time of my miners when switching.
jr. member
Activity: 76
Merit: 1

Thanks all,
BTW which pool is recomended?
is it better stick to one pool or more?


I like Zergpool.  Fine to have more than one pool, but keep in mind that the more you use, the longer it takes for payouts.

I prefer to stick to one pool.  There's nothing more annoying than bouncing back and forth between different pools on the same algo/coin.  Nemos, it would be awesome if we could somehow control this Smiley

You can increase the ActiveMinerGain% in the config tab to 10.  This will decrease switching.
https://github.com/MrPlusGH/NPlusMiner-Documentation/wiki/Config-tab-details

I actually have it set at 10% and it was sometimes a ping-pong battle between ahash and zerg on x17.  It probably wouldn't bee too difficult to implement... just add a condition to not switch to different pool on same algo, and make it an option.

Just asking, but why do you guys care how long does it take to get paid
even with 4 pools and not how much is your current profit?
How long makes sense only if you are changing to USD all the time
but if you save in BTC is not better to be more profitable ?
Thanks
jr. member
Activity: 154
Merit: 1

Thanks all,
BTW which pool is recomended?
is it better stick to one pool or more?


I like Zergpool.  Fine to have more than one pool, but keep in mind that the more you use, the longer it takes for payouts.

I prefer to stick to one pool.  There's nothing more annoying than bouncing back and forth between different pools on the same algo/coin.  Nemos, it would be awesome if we could somehow control this Smiley

You can increase the ActiveMinerGain% in the config tab to 10.  This will decrease switching.
https://github.com/MrPlusGH/NPlusMiner-Documentation/wiki/Config-tab-details

I actually have it set at 10% and it was sometimes a ping-pong battle between ahash and zerg on x17.  It probably wouldn't bee too difficult to implement... just add a condition to not switch to different pool on same algo, and make it an option.

Try 20% and increase Interval to 300 or only use one pool in the config tab.  ActiveMinerGain% and Interval are the features already in the app to control switching.  Adjusting them should solve your problem.
newbie
Activity: 10
Merit: 0

Thanks all,
BTW which pool is recomended?
is it better stick to one pool or more?


I like Zergpool.  Fine to have more than one pool, but keep in mind that the more you use, the longer it takes for payouts.

I prefer to stick to one pool.  There's nothing more annoying than bouncing back and forth between different pools on the same algo/coin.  Nemos, it would be awesome if we could somehow control this Smiley

You can increase the ActiveMinerGain% in the config tab to 10.  This will decrease switching.
https://github.com/MrPlusGH/NPlusMiner-Documentation/wiki/Config-tab-details

I actually have it set at 10% and it was sometimes a ping-pong battle between ahash and zerg on x17.  It probably wouldn't bee too difficult to implement... just add a condition to not switch to different pool on same algo, and make it an option.
jr. member
Activity: 154
Merit: 1

Thanks all,
BTW which pool is recomended?
is it better stick to one pool or more?


I like Zergpool.  Fine to have more than one pool, but keep in mind that the more you use, the longer it takes for payouts.

I prefer to stick to one pool.  There's nothing more annoying than bouncing back and forth between different pools on the same algo/coin.  Nemos, it would be awesome if we could somehow control this Smiley

You can increase the ActiveMinerGain% in the config tab to 10.  This will decrease switching.
https://github.com/MrPlusGH/NPlusMiner-Documentation/wiki/Config-tab-details
newbie
Activity: 10
Merit: 0

Thanks all,
BTW which pool is recomended?
is it better stick to one pool or more?


I like Zergpool.  Fine to have more than one pool, but keep in mind that the more you use, the longer it takes for payouts.

I prefer to stick to one pool.  There's nothing more annoying than bouncing back and forth between different pools on the same algo/coin.  Nemos, it would be awesome if we could somehow control this Smiley
newbie
Activity: 84
Merit: 0
No. No error.
But no change in the clock.
Heres some syntax for a +10 core change, just to confirm it works.

Code:
SET CORE1=10
SET MEM1=0

cmd /c "set __COMPAT_LAYER=RUNASINVOKER && start "" "C:\Users\miner\Desktop\nvidiaInspector.exe" %*"-setBaseClockOffset:0,0,%CORE1%" "-setMemoryClockOffset:0,0,%MEM1%"

THX a lot. It is working but only 1 GPU. (GPU0)

But lots, lots of testing and this is works for 3gpu

SET CORE1=150
SET MEM1=500

cmd /c "set __COMPAT_LAYER=RUNASINVOKER && start "" "C:\Users\miner\Desktop\NV\nvidiaInspector.exe" %*"-setBaseClockOffset:0,0,%CORE1%" "-setMemoryClockOffset:0,0,%MEM1%" "-setPowerTarget:0,87" "-setTempTarget:0,0,83"
cmd /c "set __COMPAT_LAYER=RUNASINVOKER && start "" "C:\Users\miner\Desktop\NV\nvidiaInspector.exe" %*"-setBaseClockOffset:1,0,%CORE1%" "-setMemoryClockOffset:1,0,%MEM1%" "-setPowerTarget:1,87" "-setTempTarget:1,0,83"
cmd /c "set __COMPAT_LAYER=RUNASINVOKER && start "" "C:\Users\miner\Desktop\NV\nvidiaInspector.exe" %*"-setBaseClockOffset:2,0,%CORE1%" "-setMemoryClockOffset:2,0,%MEM1%" "-setPowerTarget:2,87" "-setTempTarget:2,0,83"

Example of (3) different core speeds, and shorter over all. You don't need to set power & temp targets with every bat unless you WANT to change them from the previous algo.



Code:
SET CORE0=20
SET CORE1=50
SET CORE2=0
MEM1=500

cmd /c "set __COMPAT_LAYER=RUNASINVOKER && start "" "C:\Users\miner\Desktop\NV\nvidiaInspector.exe" %*"-setBaseClockOffset:0,0,%CORE0%" "-setMemoryClockOffset:0,0,%MEM1%" "-setBaseClockOffset:1,0,%CORE1%" "-setMemoryClockOffset:1,0,%MEM1%" "-setBaseClockOffset:2,0,%CORE2%" "-setMemoryClockOffset:2,0,%MEM1%"
newbie
Activity: 18
Merit: 0
NemosMiner-v3.1

https://github.com/nemosminer/NemosMiner/releases
https://github.com/nemosminer/NemosMiner/releases/download/v3.1/NemosMiner-v3.1.zip

Miner updates:
updated ccminerx16r-x16s : https://github.com/nemosminer/ccminerx16r-x16s/releases
added ccminer-cryptonight support for cryptonightV7 (nicehash) : https://github.com/KlausT/ccminer-cryptonight/releases
updated ccminer-Tpruvot : https://github.com/tpruvot/ccminer/releases
disabled XMRig (not working with more than 3 GPU's)

Algo updates:
added x16s & hmq1725 support (zergpool)
added cryptonightv7 support (nicehash)
added x16r support (ahashpool,blazepool)
changed Tribus to Tpruvotx64

Pools updates
take zergpool fee into account

If you have Windows 7, 8, or 8.1, please update PowerShell:
https://www.microsoft.com/en-us/download/details.aspx?id=50395

CCMiner may need 'MSVCR120.dll' if you don't already have it:
https://www.microsoft.com/en-gb/download/details.aspx?id=40784

CCMiner may need 'VCRUNTIME140.DLL' if you don't already have it:
https://www.microsoft.com/en-us/download/details.aspx?id=48145

running multiple cards its recommended to increase Virtual Memory 64gb is optimal

Requires nvidia driver newer than 388 (390.65 recommended)

Made For & Tested with 8x10603gb 6x1070 6x1070ti 6x1080ti (users have reported up to 12cards working have not tested myself) Some miners do not support more that 9cards

Best Regards
Nemo

reported active miner times are broken for months and nobody cares (since version 2.3 i believe)?
full member
Activity: 349
Merit: 102
i just went thru several pools. so far i saw zergpool and blazepool may be the right one? maybe, but there payout is at least 0.005, i only have a small rig . any advise will be appreciate.

buy more cards?  Tongue

sorry i know that's not constructive but afaik that's a reasonably low payout level so you'll either have to hang in there or increase your shares
Pages:
Jump to: