[NemosMiner] multi algo profit switching NVIDIA/CPU miner - page 63.

jimmykl

full member

Activity: 349

Merit: 102

Quote from: MagicSmoker on February 11, 2018, 11:08:27 AM

Quote from: starrbuck on February 11, 2018, 10:36:29 AM

If you remove timetravel and restart, it should skip the ones already benchmarked.

Thanks for the reply. I already stopped the benchmarking and switched the card over to mining Verge for a day or two while I sort out what went wrong. Based on the copy-n-paste of the miner window output above it looks like the connection wasn't set up properly (ie - the stratum and port). Unfortunately, I didn't check the miner window at any other time so can't say if this is anomalous or not...

Don't even worry about troubleshooting timetravel. If the algo isn't included in your .bat file nemos won't benchmark it.

As nemos benchmarks each algo (which takes up to 6 minutes per algo *never* hours) it creates a file in the Stats folder e.g. ccminerpolytimos_ALGO_HashRate.txt If a file exists it won't benchmark that algo. So if you want to rerun a particular benchmark you can delete the relevant file and it won't have to run them all.

tio

jr. member

Activity: 133

Merit: 7

Hi all.
What is timing interval did you setup on the pool auto switch? i realize that 300 seconds sometimes its not enough to finish the job

Last Refresh: 02/11/2018 14:31:20
Sleep 300 sec
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Running:

legendary13

newbie

Activity: 29

Merit: 0

Where are Nemo?

millsys

member

Activity: 112

Merit: 10

Quote from: MagicSmoker on February 11, 2018, 11:08:27 AM

Quote from: starrbuck on February 11, 2018, 10:36:29 AM

If you remove timetravel and restart, it should skip the ones already benchmarked.

Thanks for the reply. I already stopped the benchmarking and switched the card over to mining Verge for a day or two while I sort out what went wrong. Based on the copy-n-paste of the miner window output above it looks like the connection wasn't set up properly (ie - the stratum and port). Unfortunately, I didn't check the miner window at any other time so can't say if this is anomalous or not...

1)TimeTravel SUCKS and never makes money, remove it
2)MrPlus's NEMOSMINERPLUS is not NemosMiner, please discuss the matter in a different topic for support

MagicSmoker

full member

Activity: 420

Merit: 184

Quote from: starrbuck on February 11, 2018, 10:36:29 AM

If you remove timetravel and restart, it should skip the ones already benchmarked.

Thanks for the reply. I already stopped the benchmarking and switched the card over to mining Verge for a day or two while I sort out what went wrong. Based on the copy-n-paste of the miner window output above it looks like the connection wasn't set up properly (ie - the stratum and port). Unfortunately, I didn't check the miner window at any other time so can't say if this is anomalous or not...

starrbuck

newbie

Activity: 48

Merit: 0

If you remove timetravel and restart, it should skip the ones already benchmarked.

MagicSmoker

full member

Activity: 420

Merit: 184

Quote from: jimmykl on February 11, 2018, 06:10:36 AM

Quote from: MagicSmoker on February 11, 2018, 05:28:45 AM

So, it looks like the MrPlus fork of NemosMiner is still benchmarking some 13 hours after starting it for the first time yesterday. I suspect a lot of the 24 (!!!) algos it is evaluating aren't really appropriate for GPUs anymore (I'm not familiar with every single one of them), and it is running each benchmark for far too long.

Just comment out those algos, they're not going near the top any time soon (/ever)

Yeah, I definitely want to prune the algo list, but with just 3 left to go (the same 3 from 1 hour ago...) I feel like I might as well let it continue; of course, I thought that an hour ago, too.

However, I really want to know how to change a lot - if not all - of the scripting variables because I can absolutely assure MrPlus that I will not endure another 14+ hours and counting of benchmarking.

UPDATE - I just noticed that benchmarking is stuck on the timetravel algo so I decided to click on the miner window and this is what it is reporting:

Code:

[2018-02-10 20:05:40] Starting on stratum+tcp://:
[2018-02-10 20:05:40] NVAPI GPU monitoring enabled.
[2018-02-10 20:05:40] 1 miner thread started, using 'timetravel' algorithm.
[2018-02-10 20:05:41] API open locally in full access mode on port 4068
[2018-02-10 20:05:41] Stratum connection failed: Failed to connect to port 80: Connection refused
[2018-02-10 20:05:41] ...retry after 30 seconds

Repeat, ad nauseum...

Clearly I need to not test timetravel, but I would hate to have to do benchmarking all over again if I stop it now to remove it from the list of algos... Any suggestions for those more experienced with NemosMiner would be appreciated!

jimmykl

full member

Activity: 349

Merit: 102

Quote from: MagicSmoker on February 11, 2018, 05:28:45 AM

Quote from: MagicSmoker on February 10, 2018, 04:57:28 PM

I'm trying out the MrPlus fork of NemosMiner on Zpool right now. It's still doing the benchmarking so not much to report, but I will note that I had to make numerous edits to the bat and cmd files to get it to work because of incorrect file name references.

As I lamented in my first post to this thread, some kind of brief explanation of how to set things up and what each cmd/ps1/bat file does would be immensely useful and provide some necessary transparency; PowerShell scripts can do all sorts of damage if used maliciously or incompetently, after all.

UPDATE - holy shitsnacks, this stupid script is still benchmarking after 2 hours and 20 minutes with the default selection of algos!?! At least I am getting credit for all of this on Zpool, though some of the algos are exceptionally unprofitable.

So, it looks like the MrPlus fork of NemosMiner is still benchmarking some 13 hours after starting it for the first time yesterday. I suspect a lot of the 24 (!!!) algos it is evaluating aren't really appropriate for GPUs anymore (I'm not familiar with every single one of them), and it is running each benchmark for far too long. Here are the results so far from one of my single GTX 1080 test rigs:

Code:

Miner Algorithm Speed mBTC/Day BTC/Day USD/Day BTC/GH/Day P

ccminerpolytimos Lyra2RE2 51.49 MH/s 0.512 0.00051 4.152 0.00994 z
ccminerpolytimos Blake2s 5.11 GH/s 0.430 0.00043 3.491 0.00008 z
ccminerpolytimos X17 14.06 MH/s 0.386 0.00039 3.127 0.02743 z
CcminerAlexis78Phi Phi 24.53 MH/s 0.370 0.00037 3.004 0.01510 z
CcminerTpruvot Skunk 38.90 MH/s 0.346 0.00035 2.807 0.00890 z
PalginHSR NeoScrypt 1.26 MH/s 0.344 0.00034 2.787 0.27189 z
CcminerTpruvot Bitcore 17.34 MH/s 0.339 0.00034 2.746 0.01952 z
ccminerpolytimos Skein 679.28 MH/s 0.280 0.00028 2.268 0.00041 z
CcminerAlexis78cuda9 Xevan 4.21 MH/s 0.212 0.00021 1.716 0.05030 z
DSTM Equihash 513.85 H/s 0.209 0.00021 1.699 407.66873 z
CcminerTpruvotcuda9 Groestl 45.56 MH/s 0.167 0.00017 1.358 0.00368 z
ccminerpolytimos Nist5 56.84 MH/s 0.166 0.00017 1.346 0.00292 z
ccminerpolytimos Keccak 956.36 MH/s 0.122 0.00012 0.987 0.00013 z
CcminerTpruvotcuda9 Tribus 74.54 MH/s 0.039 0.00004 0.314 0.00052 z
ccminerAlexis78 Sib 16.41 MH/s 0.037 0.00004 0.301 0.00226 z
ccminerAlexis78 MyriadGroestl 90.84 MH/s 0.010 0.00001 0.079 0.00011 z
CcminerTpruvotx64 Lyra2z 2.22 MH/s 0.000 0.00000 0.000 -
CcminerTpruvotcuda9 X11evo 15.07 MH/s 0.000 0.00000 0.000 -
ccminerpolytimos Lbry 370.48 MH/s 0.000 0.00000 0.000 -
ccminerpolytimos Poly 27.11 MH/s 0.000 0.00000 0.000 -
ccminerpolytimos C11 21.05 MH/s 0.000 0.00000 0.000 -
ccminerAlexis78 Blakecoin Benchmarking Benchmarking Benchmarking Benchmarking 0.00003 z
ccminerAlexis78 Hsr Benchmarking Benchmarking Benchmarking Benchmarking 0.01868 z
CcminerTpruvotcuda9 Timetravel Benchmarking Benchmarking Benchmarking Benchmarking -

Just comment out those algos, they're not going near the top any time soon (/ever)

MagicSmoker

full member

Activity: 420

Merit: 184

Quote from: MagicSmoker on February 10, 2018, 04:57:28 PM

I'm trying out the MrPlus fork of NemosMiner on Zpool right now. It's still doing the benchmarking so not much to report, but I will note that I had to make numerous edits to the bat and cmd files to get it to work because of incorrect file name references.

As I lamented in my first post to this thread, some kind of brief explanation of how to set things up and what each cmd/ps1/bat file does would be immensely useful and provide some necessary transparency; PowerShell scripts can do all sorts of damage if used maliciously or incompetently, after all.

UPDATE - holy shitsnacks, this stupid script is still benchmarking after 2 hours and 20 minutes with the default selection of algos!?! At least I am getting credit for all of this on Zpool, though some of the algos are exceptionally unprofitable.

So, it looks like the MrPlus fork of NemosMiner is still benchmarking some 13 hours after starting it for the first time yesterday. I suspect a lot of the 24 (!!!) algos it is evaluating aren't really appropriate for GPUs anymore (I'm not familiar with every single one of them), and it is running each benchmark for far too long. Here are the results so far from one of my single GTX 1080 test rigs:

Code:

Miner Algorithm Speed mBTC/Day BTC/Day USD/Day BTC/GH/Day P

ccminerpolytimos Lyra2RE2 51.49 MH/s 0.512 0.00051 4.152 0.00994 z
ccminerpolytimos Blake2s 5.11 GH/s 0.430 0.00043 3.491 0.00008 z
ccminerpolytimos X17 14.06 MH/s 0.386 0.00039 3.127 0.02743 z
CcminerAlexis78Phi Phi 24.53 MH/s 0.370 0.00037 3.004 0.01510 z
CcminerTpruvot Skunk 38.90 MH/s 0.346 0.00035 2.807 0.00890 z
PalginHSR NeoScrypt 1.26 MH/s 0.344 0.00034 2.787 0.27189 z
CcminerTpruvot Bitcore 17.34 MH/s 0.339 0.00034 2.746 0.01952 z
ccminerpolytimos Skein 679.28 MH/s 0.280 0.00028 2.268 0.00041 z
CcminerAlexis78cuda9 Xevan 4.21 MH/s 0.212 0.00021 1.716 0.05030 z
DSTM Equihash 513.85 H/s 0.209 0.00021 1.699 407.66873 z
CcminerTpruvotcuda9 Groestl 45.56 MH/s 0.167 0.00017 1.358 0.00368 z
ccminerpolytimos Nist5 56.84 MH/s 0.166 0.00017 1.346 0.00292 z
ccminerpolytimos Keccak 956.36 MH/s 0.122 0.00012 0.987 0.00013 z
CcminerTpruvotcuda9 Tribus 74.54 MH/s 0.039 0.00004 0.314 0.00052 z
ccminerAlexis78 Sib 16.41 MH/s 0.037 0.00004 0.301 0.00226 z
ccminerAlexis78 MyriadGroestl 90.84 MH/s 0.010 0.00001 0.079 0.00011 z
CcminerTpruvotx64 Lyra2z 2.22 MH/s 0.000 0.00000 0.000 -
CcminerTpruvotcuda9 X11evo 15.07 MH/s 0.000 0.00000 0.000 -
ccminerpolytimos Lbry 370.48 MH/s 0.000 0.00000 0.000 -
ccminerpolytimos Poly 27.11 MH/s 0.000 0.00000 0.000 -
ccminerpolytimos C11 21.05 MH/s 0.000 0.00000 0.000 -
ccminerAlexis78 Blakecoin Benchmarking Benchmarking Benchmarking Benchmarking 0.00003 z
ccminerAlexis78 Hsr Benchmarking Benchmarking Benchmarking Benchmarking 0.01868 z
CcminerTpruvotcuda9 Timetravel Benchmarking Benchmarking Benchmarking Benchmarking -

Boffinboy24

newbie

Activity: 24

Merit: 0

Quote from: tio on February 10, 2018, 10:38:12 PM

oh, i dint know about that. thanks for letting me know.
as you said..... interesting times....will see!

Checked github, think this was already done on Nemos a couple of days ago

BitBustah

hero member

Activity: 1218

Merit: 534

Quote from: baenregod on February 10, 2018, 06:11:51 PM

Testing ahashpool vs blazepool, current profit .bats (not 24hr actual) with a 5% switch and 30s interval, each with a 6 x 1070 rig, they are overclocked the same, 75%/100/500, but have slightly different hash rates due to different models in each, but fairly close. I had to disable keccak on blazepool bc it kept showing the profit as orders of magnitude off.

Currently about a day into the test, the btc/24hr is approximately the following:
blazepool - 0.0018384
ahashpool - 0.0015329

So currently blazepool is winning by about 20% 1 day in. I'll try to keep going for at least a few days. Hopefully the rigs stay online the same, I've had occasional trouble with them hanging up every once in a while, can't figure out why, which would skew the results.

Thanks for sharing. Please keep us up to date.

tio

jr. member

Activity: 133

Merit: 7

Quote from: jimmykl on February 10, 2018, 07:11:27 PM

Quote from: tio on February 10, 2018, 03:20:27 PM

Quote

This is a FORK off NEMOSMINER and is OFF TOPIC. Mr Plus should start a new thread

On the Github MrPlus and Nemosminer start work together, now they are both are contributors of thit project

https://github.com/MrPlusGH?tab=repositories

That just shows MrPlus has forked Nemosminer.

You can fork any public Github project but it doesn't necessarily mean you're contributing to the original project. https://help.github.com/articles/fork-a-repo/

If MrPlus made a pull request and Nemos merged it with the upstream repo then they'd be co-operating. But MrPlus could equally choose to cherry pick improvements as they see fit or branch away entirely. And vice versa. Interesting times.

oh, i dint know about that. thanks for letting me know.
as you said..... interesting times....will see!

jimmykl

full member

Activity: 349

Merit: 102

Quote from: tio on February 10, 2018, 03:20:27 PM

Quote

This is a FORK off NEMOSMINER and is OFF TOPIC. Mr Plus should start a new thread

On the Github MrPlus and Nemosminer start work together, now they are both are contributors of thit project

https://github.com/MrPlusGH?tab=repositories

That just shows MrPlus has forked Nemosminer.

You can fork any public Github project but it doesn't necessarily mean you're contributing to the original project. https://help.github.com/articles/fork-a-repo/

If MrPlus made a pull request and Nemos merged it with the upstream repo then they'd be co-operating. But MrPlus could equally choose to cherry pick improvements as they see fit or branch away entirely. And vice versa. Interesting times.

nickvasel

newbie

Activity: 15

Merit: 0

Quote from: MagicSmoker on February 10, 2018, 06:50:51 PM

Quote from: nickvasel on February 10, 2018, 06:43:23 PM

Quote from: MagicSmoker on February 10, 2018, 06:40:59 PM

Quote from: nickvasel on February 10, 2018, 06:29:54 PM

Question.... What does this do---> -Passwordcurrency BTC

It's very important that the value specified there match the address given elsewhere. E.g. - if you use a bitcoin address then make sure -Passwordcurrency is set to BTC.

I'm using mining pool hub, so does it still need a BTC address or can I omit both?

I've used NemosMiner with MPH and here is the relevant portion from my modified bat file:

-Currency USD -Passwordcurrency BTC -interval 120 -Username MagicSmoker -Workername eleusis1 -Location US -ActiveMinerGainPct 5 -PoolName miningpoolhub

This worked for me, but as for whether every single bit is necessary, I don't know.

Okay looks good to me, my I ask why "-ActiveMinerGainPct 5"?

MagicSmoker

full member

Activity: 420

Merit: 184

Quote from: nickvasel on February 10, 2018, 06:43:23 PM

Quote from: MagicSmoker on February 10, 2018, 06:40:59 PM

Quote from: nickvasel on February 10, 2018, 06:29:54 PM

Question.... What does this do---> -Passwordcurrency BTC

It's very important that the value specified there match the address given elsewhere. E.g. - if you use a bitcoin address then make sure -Passwordcurrency is set to BTC.

I'm using mining pool hub, so does it still need a BTC address or can I omit both?

I've used NemosMiner with MPH and here is the relevant portion from my modified bat file:

-Currency USD -Passwordcurrency BTC -interval 120 -Username MagicSmoker -Workername eleusis1 -Location US -ActiveMinerGainPct 5 -PoolName miningpoolhub

This worked for me, but as for whether every single bit is necessary, I don't know.

nickvasel

newbie

Activity: 15

Merit: 0

Quote from: MagicSmoker on February 10, 2018, 06:40:59 PM

Quote from: nickvasel on February 10, 2018, 06:29:54 PM

Question.... What does this do---> -Passwordcurrency BTC

It's very important that the value specified there match the address given elsewhere. E.g. - if you use a bitcoin address then make sure -Passwordcurrency is set to BTC.

I'm using mining pool hub, so does it still need a BTC address or can I omit both?

MagicSmoker

full member

Activity: 420

Merit: 184

Quote from: nickvasel on February 10, 2018, 06:29:54 PM

Question.... What does this do---> -Passwordcurrency BTC

It's very important that the value specified there match the address given elsewhere. E.g. - if you use a bitcoin address then make sure -Passwordcurrency is set to BTC.

nickvasel

newbie

Activity: 15

Merit: 0

Question.... What does this do---> -Passwordcurrency BTC

baenregod

newbie

Activity: 4

Merit: 0

Testing ahashpool vs blazepool, current profit .bats (not 24hr actual) with a 5% switch and 30s interval, each with a 6 x 1070 rig, they are overclocked the same, 75%/100/500, but have slightly different hash rates due to different models in each, but fairly close. I had to disable keccak on blazepool bc it kept showing the profit as orders of magnitude off.

Currently about a day into the test, the btc/24hr is approximately the following:
blazepool - 0.0018384
ahashpool - 0.0015329

So currently blazepool is winning by about 20% 1 day in. I'll try to keep going for at least a few days. Hopefully the rigs stay online the same, I've had occasional trouble with them hanging up every once in a while, can't figure out why, which would skew the results.

MagicSmoker

full member

Activity: 420

Merit: 184

I'm trying out the MrPlus fork of NemosMiner on Zpool right now. It's still doing the benchmarking so not much to report, but I will note that I had to make numerous edits to the bat and cmd files to get it to work because of incorrect file name references.

As I lamented in my first post to this thread, some kind of brief explanation of how to set things up and what each cmd/ps1/bat file does would be immensely useful and provide some necessary transparency; PowerShell scripts can do all sorts of damage if used maliciously or incompetently, after all.

UPDATE - holy shitsnacks, this stupid script is still benchmarking after 2 hours and 20 minutes with the default selection of algos!?! At least I am getting credit for all of this on Zpool, though some of the algos are exceptionally unprofitable.

Topic: [NemosMiner] multi algo profit switching NVIDIA/CPU miner - page 63. (Read 289464 times)