Topic: Never invest no product ICOs - page 15. (Read 6796 times)
I concur at some point since we never knew whether the promising ICO is a trick it is smarter to make sure so we can recognize what we will contribute and not but rather the crypto world is a hazard taking world so it is dependent upon you
As far as I know, ico is being launched to raise money for the development of a product or service, but I have not yet seen ico with a finished product and especially a worker. But I think that when choosing ico it is necessary to pay what exactly the product is going to be created by the team. As an example, I can bring a new ico EOT. EOT plans to create a new decentralized gaming platform where there will be no only players but also game developers and their vengeance service. The platform will also be on different systems: Etherium, EOS and others. I think that the very idea of creating a platform already costs a lot, so the game direction is now trendy. As for the finished product, then you just need to keep track of information about how the project is being developed and whether work is being done on create a product or service.
You're right, the vast majority are researching projects, but that is exactly the problem. Most of them get never completed. And if you look enough you find at least projects that developed some kind of prototype, an early version of the product.
Very rarely you come across ICO's with a working product, but these exist too. Just have a look at Metahash.
The success of an ICO is influenced by many factors, like the team, the idea, and the MVP of course. If there is no MVP though, the other factors must be very strong.
Currently, there are not many products on the ICO market. Do not invest in a project without a working product .
Here is a project which I found promising where one can earn coins forever. Worth investing.
It's a good project and is in its initial stage. Intended to work for IOT and Nano-Tech.
Seems profitable.
They introduced PMA (Permanent Master Address), most probably they are restricting founder's profit and providing the same to miners and investors.
More Info about this crypto and project is here Doppler Website
https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/ann-doppler-coin-20-reward-on-deposit-annually-4553663
An airdrop is also going to conclude this week which you can opt for now.
All contact links and information on their website.
It's a good project and is in its initial stage. Intended to work for IOT and Nano-Tech.
Seems profitable.
They introduced PMA (Permanent Master Address), most probably they are restricting founder's profit and providing the same to miners and investors.
More Info about this crypto and project is here Doppler Website
https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/ann-doppler-coin-20-reward-on-deposit-annually-4553663
An airdrop is also going to conclude this week which you can opt for now.
All contact links and information on their website.
I was wondering, why a lot of projects don't have such an important thing for a successful ICO as a product.
When a company has a product it means they have it to develop. In such case, a company shows why they need ICO and how the company will be growing. What is more, there is more trust because a company has experience in a field they are working.
For example, KickCity company that exists two years. KickCity an event platform that generates revenue and has a Helsinki government grant. KickCity needs ICO to make business bigger and to become a decentralized platform where every user is rewarded for ticket promotion.
On the other hand, no product ICOs can prove their success just in theory. There is no proof base that product will be developed and will be working right.
In such unstable industry as ICO everything has to be under control. The product is one of the things that shows the campaign is not a scam. That is why I believe it is better to invest in ready-made products ICOs.
well, there are also successful projects without products, but you are right, it is better not to risk and not invest in a company without a product, in this bearish market When a company has a product it means they have it to develop. In such case, a company shows why they need ICO and how the company will be growing. What is more, there is more trust because a company has experience in a field they are working.
For example, KickCity company that exists two years. KickCity an event platform that generates revenue and has a Helsinki government grant. KickCity needs ICO to make business bigger and to become a decentralized platform where every user is rewarded for ticket promotion.
On the other hand, no product ICOs can prove their success just in theory. There is no proof base that product will be developed and will be working right.
In such unstable industry as ICO everything has to be under control. The product is one of the things that shows the campaign is not a scam. That is why I believe it is better to invest in ready-made products ICOs.
I personally think that ICO without products is like a scam. The risk of investment is very high. If you can accurately identify its authenticity, I think it can be invested in moderation, because although there are risks, its return is huge.
Unfortunately, even scammers are ready-made products ... this should not be guided choosing iso
no one can confirm the condition, all look the same and convincing I also have difficulty in choosing maybe just following the expert opinion that can be used but that is not always true.
Unfortunately, even scammers are ready-made products ... this should not be guided choosing iso
I think investing in a company without a product is possible only if you are sure that this company is not a scam and if the company has a very promising project.
The product is a very good marker to investor that this project probably will be. But most of teams not ready to pay own money for the project they will going to do. Almost 90% of ICO have no working products when they launch a crowd sale for the public and they add this on their road map. So invest to ICO have a product is better.
Better to product was. But there are many examples when the ICO team did not provide the product. You could only read about it in white paper. But then, after the ICO, we could see both the product and the price increase.
I agree with you, to avoid more ICO scams, you should understand, that the ICO works to raise funds for a project that usually involves blockchains, but if you don't need that technology to drive the project, what are they doing it? There is a very good chance that the company will be a scam if the company does not have a product and often it is better not to take risks.
Projects are at the beginning and only present their solutions, so no product is inevitable, but you have to know that technology projects if "lucky" it will. There is a value you have never thought of. One of my advice is that the ICO does not have a product so the team's performance is key. Look for ways to know as much information about the group of projects you are looking to invest.
I agree with you, because many ICOs who do not have products are scams.
A working product is one of the factors by which I choose ICO for investing. Such projects cause great confidence among investors and they have a better chance of collecting hardcap in a short time
Yes I agreed with I'm also not invest on nk product ico according to me this type of ico only is like blind game so I'm not trust on no product ico.
The structure of Havven is stable due to the fact that it uses two koins. The first one is called Nomins, it is a stable crypto currency that can be used for everyday transactions. The second is called Havvens. The company receives a commission for each transaction made in Nomins. After that the amount of the commission is distributed among the holders of the current, will return to the company. Then the duties are distributed back to holders of Havven tokens, who are rewarded for maintaining the system that supports themselves.
Many ICOs have no product before they launch their public sale and they only promise product after succesful public sale, after they reach soft-cap.
It is the reality, why well estabilished busness should start ICO?
It is the reality, why well estabilished busness should start ICO?
ICO with no product is a absolute sketchy investment and has a very high percentage of failing in terms of crowdfunding. Some Investors today is finding a good ICO depending on the project they are making, ICO’s product has a very large impact on the project. No one will throw a money on a fake ICO.
Jump to: