Topic: Never invest no product ICOs - page 40. (Read 6803 times)
Realtalk, mate! I've always used this rule to find good and interesting ICOs. And I've found the very one - Cryptics platform, which provides AI forecasts and trading things and other stuff. Apart from other proofs, they even got MVP before the presales round and plan to update it to the full version right to the end of ICO. I hope, that's a trustworthy project, gonna be awesome as the idea is amazing
you are not right.
there are projects that even in such a market make a significant profit, look at seele and quarkchain!
there are projects that even in such a market make a significant profit, look at seele and quarkchain!
Due to the fact that many ideas are really original and very promising around the ICO created hype. Therefore, many people are ready to invest in ICO because they are impressed with the idea and confident in the success of the project. 
Of course, a project with a work product is a certain guarantee for your investments, but there are ICO projects in the market without a work product that can bring you profit, even in the short term. Everything depends on the specific project.
I agree. Everything depends on the project. But if the company has a product, then such a company people trust more.
I think it's good to subscribe always to this, anytime anyone wanna invest in any ICO. This is because many of the project out now, seeks to just entice people with some fake promises, collect their money to finally run with it cos their ideas aren't such that can stand the test of time.
Yes. I think now ICP. Technology is not important to the project itself. It is important that more people participate. Then the whale can eat small fish. The ICO market has changed. It was not the market of last year. So I do not recommend investing in ICO.
In my opinion, The success of an ICO depends on the project structure the team of developers among other factors. just like not every ICO will succeed, not all will fail either, infarct some ICOs register high rates of success, it all depends on its focus, look keenly, compare and contrast and research well and you will know what works
I remember Electroneum branding themselves as the next Bitcoin. Started with $0.01 in their ICO last October 2017, launched around $0.10 in December 2017. They never had any working products, just pure paper. They only had a beta mobile miner in early January 2018.
This is sound advice right here, some people are so keen on investing in icos that they are not even doing enough research to check if these icos have a valid product that they can offer which will be here for the long term. Without a product, then an ico is most likely to end up failing because people are not using the coin.
I agree. Choose cryptocurrencies which are tied to a real sector. Today, you can see a large number of ICO projects. It became so popular and fashionable that ICO decided to go all out. There should be more projects which offer long-term investments. Because only financial pyramides can tell that you'll immediately become a millionaire after investing. The best way to profit from ICO is to invest into ideas which are already turned into projects.
With a lot of current ico, we do not have time to study all the projects. Who have a real product attracts more investment. But in fact they are also not always successful.
You do everything right, you do not need to invest your money in projects that do not even have an alpha version, it's clear, but sometimes there are people who have a great reputation, so talking about the product does not matter.
Yes, investment is already in the finished products that went to the stock exchange is much safer. But everyone needs a big profit so we risk buying different tokens
very good advice, there is every tendency that projects without products have little impact in the society and as such do not meet the needs of the majority of the cities in the world. the products gives a sense of confidence to the investors.
I think that the availability of a product can not be considered a single indicator. Here, nevertheless, we need to consider the complex. A team of developers, agreements, and a minimum finished product including. It is clear that if there is a foundation and co -and is engaged in the development of what already exists. Then the chances of success are greater. But this is not always true. If the team is brilliant, they can and from nothing make candy. And we will add state support. As for example, a Gig Treks. I think the project will be in demand. Add more agreements on cooperation. We add intelligent investors with analysts. And this all can significantly outweigh the availability of the product.
Investing an ICO without a working product is like putting your money on something that uncertain.
MVP is required as a guarantee for investors that the ICO is really have some working platform to use by peoples.
MVP is required as a guarantee for investors that the ICO is really have some working platform to use by peoples.
I agree, I only invest into ICOs that have some sort of a working model as I can see what is going on. I would advise others to do this as well. Working product icos are the best to invest into
There are some ICOs that do not have real products, for example ICO bank, the ICO has no physical and real product, but until now the ICO is practically successful and good
To some extent, you do have a point, its safer to invest in ready made products as you are shielded from the uncertainties of the ICO success, and most of the times the ready made products have a proven record, But a gain not all ICOs will fail, some of the ready made products you talk about were at an early development stage at some point and some had an ICO stage and they proved successful. It all comes to the amount of risk you are wiling to take, remember, high risks yields high rewards
This is a good analysis. Before the ICO created the prototype, the company launched and discovered the investment, which meant it was really effective and experienced, knew the weaknesses of the project and would overcome them. ICO without a product is like a scam and it will not gain people's trust.
Jump to: