Topic: Never invest no product ICOs - page 59. (Read 6774 times)
I would definitely agree with you. With a working product it gives the investors more confidence and assurance that a project is in the right track. A working product is always been in my check list before I invest in some ICO's.
I do not agree with you, it may be better for a company to have a product when you invest in them, but many icos have no products do not mean that they have no investment value.
For example, ETH just came out with only a white paper, but still very successful.
For example, ETH just came out with only a white paper, but still very successful.
I know. You can't blame project without a product. They still can be good
I think there has to be a fine balance, never say never but with the current trends and plethora of project it makes sense to see some evidence that the team has the capability to deliver what has been promised at least a test Alpha of a product.
True! Also this is important to check everything out out the team and the project
I do not agree with you, it may be better for a company to have a product when you invest in them, but many icos have no products do not mean that they have no investment value.
For example, ETH just came out with only a white paper, but still very successful.
For example, ETH just came out with only a white paper, but still very successful.
I would say this is true...95% of the time. You are taking a bigger risk investing in an ICO with no product. However, to say that every ICO that starts out without a product, will not produce one...is incorrect. Its true that many do not but some do. Its similar to investing in an established company (with a product) or investing in a start up. If you are new, you should stick with companies with a product. Those of us that have been in crypto a while and know how to research a company., the team, etc.....you can win big. You never know. Every company is really a crapshoot. You can invest in a great company but a month late someone comes out with a project that makes your investment irrelevant.
I was wondering, why a lot of projects don't have such an important thing for a successful ICO as a product.
When a company has a product it means they have it to develop. In such case, a company shows why they need ICO and how the company will be growing. What is more, there is more trust because a company has experience in a field they are working.
For example, KickCity company that exists two years. KickCity an event platform that generates revenue and has a Helsinki government grant. KickCity needs ICO to make business bigger and to become a decentralized platform where every user is rewarded for ticket promotion.
On the other hand, no product ICOs can prove their success just in theory. There is no proof base that product will be developed and will be working right.
In such unstable industry as ICO everything has to be under control. The product is one of the things that shows the campaign is not a scam. That is why I believe it is better to invest in ready-made products ICOs.
When a company has a product it means they have it to develop. In such case, a company shows why they need ICO and how the company will be growing. What is more, there is more trust because a company has experience in a field they are working.
For example, KickCity company that exists two years. KickCity an event platform that generates revenue and has a Helsinki government grant. KickCity needs ICO to make business bigger and to become a decentralized platform where every user is rewarded for ticket promotion.
On the other hand, no product ICOs can prove their success just in theory. There is no proof base that product will be developed and will be working right.
In such unstable industry as ICO everything has to be under control. The product is one of the things that shows the campaign is not a scam. That is why I believe it is better to invest in ready-made products ICOs.
This one that i always notice before investing in ico. This is the main thing of the ico to be developed.
If no product, it migt be scam. I know its not 100% scam but at least it has indication to be scam. So start now stay away from unproduct ico.
The projects that don't have a product and later releases one goes up in value much higher than one that has a product in the beginning. It's a greater risk to invest in a no product ICO and if the team doesn't deliver, you can lose your investment.
Its true that theres always been hope for ICOs with products but not all products from ICOs gets sold in the market. Some just dont get positive feedbacks from consumers and just gets dump as time goes by. So its not the having a product thing must be the basis. Always look for the content of the project with or without a product.
I think there has to be a fine balance, never say never but with the current trends and plethora of project it makes sense to see some evidence that the team has the capability to deliver what has been promised at least a test Alpha of a product.
Investing in a ready-made Ico project is a logical idea. You want to earn a guarantee. But not all Ico projects are fraudulent. Many Ico platforms have a strong technological sense.
true. unfortunately scam ICOs spoiled the reputation of other progects
In my opinion, it is better to make your own research and trust your guts, also if the project already achieved some milestones it adds more confidence to the project.
The most of the privacy coins are undervalued right now.
The best opportunity is to find a privacy-related project with a low total supply (less than 100M), that way the price will be increasing much faster.
I recently found one project called Ethereum Meta, it is related to anonymity and untraceable transaction. They have a very interesting project to build the Anonymous E-Market Place.
They are on Pre-ICO stage right now, you can check their website: http://ethermeta.com/
Or even better go through their Bitcointalk thread: https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/future-of-privacy-ethereum-meta-foundation-of-anonymous-e-marketplace-2659058
The most of the privacy coins are undervalued right now.
The best opportunity is to find a privacy-related project with a low total supply (less than 100M), that way the price will be increasing much faster.
I recently found one project called Ethereum Meta, it is related to anonymity and untraceable transaction. They have a very interesting project to build the Anonymous E-Market Place.
They are on Pre-ICO stage right now, you can check their website: http://ethermeta.com/
Or even better go through their Bitcointalk thread: https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/future-of-privacy-ethereum-meta-foundation-of-anonymous-e-marketplace-2659058
not necessarily. If the product is still in development and the whitepaper and team do justice, then the coin worth is guaranteed to rise. Plus most of the companies without a product are now launching utility tokens that can be used only on their platforms.
We are a company are doing the same as well. We have a New ticket exchange with 0 transactions.
You can join our group to get more information on our Bounty program, new ICO and details of the upcoming website.
https://t.me/amicorumlive
We are a company are doing the same as well. We have a New ticket exchange with 0 transactions.
You can join our group to get more information on our Bounty program, new ICO and details of the upcoming website.
https://t.me/amicorumlive
Yes. Better to invest in ICOs Which has products. But that doesn't mean all the other ICOs scam. There are some projects which has no product at ICO stage but they have good vision, good plan and team. I think those ICOs also good to invest.
Yes its better to invest which have product because if you invest to those ICO without product, theres possibility that you can loss all your money, so think twice before you going to invest in no product ICO. Also check everything about the ICO your going to participate because some of them are not true, choose wisely.
Yeah it is always recommended to have a look at the projects and if there is already a working product. A lot of projects are just trying to collect some funds to create a product but I think that is the wrong way to make a great project!
Yes. Better to invest in ICOs Which has products. But that doesn't mean all the other ICOs scam. There are some projects which has no product at ICO stage but they have good vision, good plan and team. I think those ICOs also good to invest.
Yes its better to invest which have product because if you invest to those ICO without product, theres possibility that you can loss all your money, so think twice before you going to invest in no product ICO. Also check everything about the ICO your going to participate because some of them are not true, choose wisely.
I fully support you, because I also think that I can not invest in projects that do not have at least an Alpha Version of the product. This immediately cuts off most of the projects that are created to deceive people.
I was wondering, why a lot of projects don't have such an important thing for a successful ICO as a product.
When a company has a product it means they have it to develop. In such case, a company shows why they need ICO and how the company will be growing. What is more, there is more trust because a company has experience in a field they are working.
For example, KickCity company that exists two years. KickCity an event platform that generates revenue and has a Helsinki government grant. KickCity needs ICO to make business bigger and to become a decentralized platform where every user is rewarded for ticket promotion.
On the other hand, no product ICOs can prove their success just in theory. There is no proof base that product will be developed and will be working right.
In such unstable industry as ICO everything has to be under control. The product is one of the things that shows the campaign is not a scam. That is why I believe it is better to invest in ready-made products ICOs.
Seeing projects which do have already a working product is good but not all projects that doesnt have working product isnt really worth to invest yet there are projects which are really worth to put up money with just seeing on their roadmap and development timeframe we would able to point out that this would really be a good one. Its up to you if you do risk it or not but im assuring you that there are already lots pf projects doesnt really need or necessarily to have a working product for them to succeed. When a company has a product it means they have it to develop. In such case, a company shows why they need ICO and how the company will be growing. What is more, there is more trust because a company has experience in a field they are working.
For example, KickCity company that exists two years. KickCity an event platform that generates revenue and has a Helsinki government grant. KickCity needs ICO to make business bigger and to become a decentralized platform where every user is rewarded for ticket promotion.
On the other hand, no product ICOs can prove their success just in theory. There is no proof base that product will be developed and will be working right.
In such unstable industry as ICO everything has to be under control. The product is one of the things that shows the campaign is not a scam. That is why I believe it is better to invest in ready-made products ICOs.
You are making a valid point really. ICOs are meant to have a working and reliable product and a prototype to show for. This will boost investors morale to invest more. But don't forget that some some ICOs that don't have prototype to show in the past have done really well. Though most of them leads to scam.
Yeah, better invest in icos that already have a working product or at least a decent demo of what they are gonna do. It's miles better than waiting for a long time until they release their alpha version and wait more until the commercial release. If there's demo then at least the team prepare a lot for the ico and serious about their project.
yeah. That is what I mean
i agree with u.
but the problem is almost 80% ICO now only offering service without physical product.
and from my own research,about 60% from that 80% have a good whitepaper and time plan.
so i think there still some good non product ico out there.
but the problem is almost 80% ICO now only offering service without physical product.
and from my own research,about 60% from that 80% have a good whitepaper and time plan.
so i think there still some good non product ico out there.
Jump to: