Topic: Never trust an ICO ranking site! - page 4. (Read 2553 times)
full member
Activity: 882
Merit: 102
PayAccept - Worldwide payments accepted in seconds
ICO industry is like a heaven for all scammers, do you know from which source money comes? Mostly from people that are using ICO investments due to money laundering. So not only ICO creators are scammers but also some investors. What a crazy market.
This can go both way I think. You can not say everything wrong at first time but the reality is different. In cryptocurrencies arena there are so many projects are coming on daily basis. Some project maker are looking to make a brilliant idea project to help the society but some are looking to just do the ico or ieo then never look again. ICO ranking can do bad with us these things happened in past. So I can say never trust ico ranking site as a blind do your own research about project and they buy and sell whatever Yaar thank you.
legendary
Activity: 3010
Merit: 1028
Leading Crypto Sports Betting & Casino Platform
If you have a poll here 90% of the voters or participants will not trust ICO anymore, why would we, when they can contribute to the mess of ICO I used to check on the credibility of the projects on their list but after proving that they are giving a good rating to those scam projects because of the fee they received I lost trust on these ICO rating sites.
The fact that they provide some kind of offer for the projects that want to pay certain amount is already a dead giveaway but it seems for most of people nowadays their existence is still relevant enough that new ico ranking website keep appearing and offering their services in various groups. I guess wherever there's money there's always people that wants to make some fortune out of it. 
I don't believe in ICO ranking sites. Most of them are paid and not real.
The more they get from the team (payment) the better the rank they will give!
What I am looking for in ICO is looking at MVP, live and working products. Something that really can make a difference. Not just empty words with fancy pictures.
The more they get from the team (payment) the better the rank they will give!
What I am looking for in ICO is looking at MVP, live and working products. Something that really can make a difference. Not just empty words with fancy pictures.
Well I agree most of them are paid service these days and they provide good rating to the projects who paid them for listing. So that's why we should always DYOR
From the beginning until now I have never trusted any site that ranks ICO, doing research first before investing is a very wise decision because it's done by big investors
Yes, I do agree with you, there have been many ICO ranking sites that had given lots of good reviews and ratings to the many ICO which hasn't have the potential because this is paid service and if ICO pays well to this ICO ranking sites they would give good ratings as well they would represent the ico like potentially great so everyone can join it. That's why keep doing your own research to find out what's right and what's wrong. 
I don't believe in ICO ranking sites. Most of them are paid and not real.
The more they get from the team (payment) the better the rank they will give!
What I am looking for in ICO is looking at MVP, live and working products. Something that really can make a difference. Not just empty words with fancy pictures.
The more they get from the team (payment) the better the rank they will give!
What I am looking for in ICO is looking at MVP, live and working products. Something that really can make a difference. Not just empty words with fancy pictures.
Well I agree most of them are paid service these days and they provide good rating to the projects who paid them for listing. So that's why we should always DYOR
Yes I do agree with you. There has been many incidents in the past that has led to people not trusting those sites. You should always come to conclusion based on multiple websites and not just one website. it always helps to look at different websites and do your own research.
If you have a poll here 90% of the voters or participants will not trust ICO anymore, why would we, when they can contribute to the mess of ICO I used to check on the credibility of the projects on their list but after proving that they are giving a good rating to those scam projects because of the fee they received I lost trust on these ICO rating sites.
From the beginning until now I have never trusted any site that ranks ICO, doing research first before investing is a very wise decision because it's done by big investors
Until now, I also don't really believe it, but I still use it as a reference. they certainly have their own strands to give branches to a project. if they do it randomly, I'm sure the site won't be famous. however, I prioritize my own opinion rather than looking at the rate on the site. 
From the beginning until now I have never trusted any site that ranks ICO, doing research first before investing is a very wise decision because it's done by big investors
I don't think there is even one reliable ICO ranking site, that you can trust with all your heart. Since they are basing their ratings from the docs submitted by the dev team and the links associated with it, they have no way of knowing the real motives of the dev team. I don't think the project's owner will say to the ranking site that they will just grab money from naive users, right?
From the beginning until now I have never trusted any site that ranks ICO, doing research first before investing is a very wise decision because it's done by big investors
Now do your own research. Never trust other people's judgments because they can be fake and misleading investors. Just do your research for yourself and find the best projects to invest in
yes,never trust the ICO website. they are paid handsomely to deceive their investors. My advice is do your own research, use suggestions as reference material. legendary
Activity: 3010
Merit: 1028
Leading Crypto Sports Betting & Casino Platform
Those rankings are mostly paid. I don't trust any scores and prefer to judge myself, after personal experience and researching of the subject. Other brains will never replace yours so that work on your own opinion.
They are still useful to make quick judgement though and if the reason behind why we look up certain project in ico ranking is not as crucial as investing. The sole reason of that site existence is for money and that's why many websites similar like that eager to advertise themselves in many crypto groups, to gather views which means a lot more money. 
Those rankings are mostly paid. I don't trust any scores and prefer to judge myself, after personal experience and researching of the subject. Other brains will never replace yours so that work on your own opinion.
Yub! Personal experiences, instincts and knowledges are really important and helpful in doing this business. I don't usually trust any comments, rankings or opinions even in other circumstances. I prefer to explore anf study myself. I'll take others' experiences and comments as references. 
Yes, it's indeed true many ico ranking sites has been showing some of the worst reviews. That's why you need to spend most of the time on your own research to get genuine reviews towards the ico. As well on the other hand their are some good ico ranking sites which has been doing really well by providing good source of information.
Yes they do provide a piece of good information about a particular project, but I don't trust them any more for all their recommendations on what projects are good to invest, I've been burned several times by their recommendations so I don't trust them anymore I prefer listening to my co-investors and bounty hunters than these ICO rating sites.
Yes, it's indeed true many ico ranking sites has been showing some of the worst reviews. That's why you need to spend most of the time on your own research to get genuine reviews towards the ico. As well on the other hand their are some good ico ranking sites which has been doing really well by providing good source of information.
Now do your own research. Never trust other people's judgments because they can be fake and misleading investors. Just do your research for yourself and find the best projects to invest in
I second that. But at the same time, some of these ICO review sites do have experts working for them. So there is a good chance that they may have access to additional information, which is not readily available in the public domain. The best thing to do is to do your own research along with the information that you get from the review sites. You can validate the information on your own.
i dont have trust to them either ;Dthose ico ranking site are paid by those development team just to make sure their project looks highly and fairly rank.
So far icobench is the only ico site that has already revealed to get paid to list a scam ico but i don't even think about there were so many sites were doing the same like what icobench did before. The latest ico sites much more focused into the community decision to list the new ico.
Why would they reveal such? Doing so will obviously lead them to lose their visitors since those who trusted those reviews will view those as bought reviews and won't trust their analysis anymore.
They all are bought as long as they are spouting nonsense only with pros and don't put nothing bad or some concerns about the project.
Now do your own research. Never trust other people's judgments because they can be fake and misleading investors. Just do your research for yourself and find the best projects to invest in
This is not new anymore, no matter who or what hype a new project this doesn't mean it will survive or do very well, you are on your own if you are choosing projects based on ICO rating websites, it's a complete misleading
Jump to: