This is not sensible currently.
Let's take an example into account.
User A is a Hero Member and wants to try to earn 0.1 BTC in a month.
That is 0.025 BTC/Week
According to your rates , they need to have 0.025/0.00002 activity , which is 1250.
Nobody on this forums has 1250 activity and nobody with that much activity would even consider joining a signature campaign.
( Highest I have seen is around 800 activity)
I think you need to change your payments , to make it atleast slightly viable.
Best of luck with your campaign,
Jambola2
Let's take an example into account.
User A is a Hero Member and wants to try to earn 0.1 BTC in a month.
That is 0.025 BTC/Week
According to your rates , they need to have 0.025/0.00002 activity , which is 1250.
Nobody on this forums has 1250 activity and nobody with that much activity would even consider joining a signature campaign.
( Highest I have seen is around 800 activity)
I think you need to change your payments , to make it atleast slightly viable.
Best of luck with your campaign,
Jambola2
So what you are saying is that I need to double the prices? Are you aware that you also earn 0.001*total amount bet by anyone who signs up by clicking on your link?
Can you point me to a program that pays out more? If so, I'll make some adjustments.
Thanks for your feedback...
I think Lowering the "earn up to 0.1BTC/Month" would work.
It seems like you are focusing on the marketing message in the subject of the post. Admittedly you would need a high activity level to achieve the 0.1 payout on signature payments alone. However, there are folks on the forum who can (theymos for example and a few others that I have seen). Adding in the the 0.001*amount bet referral fees makes that level quite reachable for others with lower levels as well. My final point would be that we only require 200 posts for the month, other programs are substantially higher. We think requiring 100+ posts per day contributes to spam on the forum, and is a bit ridiculous.
What we are hoping to do is make our program as competitive as possible. We are the first program to offer payouts that take into account the recent changes in forum signature rules, so we are charting new territory here. We really don't know what value the smaller signatures bring, particularly the newbie signature that has no link capability.
It would be great help if you or others could point me to other programs that are better (in payout, up front payment, instant withdrawal, automated processing, etc...). If we can review other programs, we will tune ours up to make it even more beneficial to you.
Thanks again for the feedback...
