Topic: New Gambling Site has a Short Signature Campaign - page 3. (Read 464 times)

I personally believe that it would make sense if this bear market affects the finances of casinos, if they kept much of their funds in Bitcoin or other fluctuating cryptocurrency. Also, let us keep in mind that during these down markets people are trying to cover their realized and unrealized losses, leaving less room for gambling, the casinos know this hence their adjust their advertising budget and wait for a better season to continue with their campaigns.

Every firm have an allocation for the promotion. At times they weren't able to stick to the plans based on the market and the revenue. In recent days I saw a gambling platform that had its signature campaign running for few weeks, but all of the sudden it announced its closure within few months. Later came to know about the reason as lack of revenue. I think the platform was dragoncoin or something like that.

When you said both gambling sites did not last long it has a different meaning altogether. When it comes to signature campaigns it is their choice whether they want to conduct a campaign or want to spend money any other way.

Campaign managers decide those stipulation, you can be active in Development & Technical Discussion and Bitcoin Technical Support if you are looking for merits  .

We all know the market is down I think this is really affecting the new gambling website, most of the signature campaigns that have been running even during the bear market are not new gambling site, they have been here for long time, even with the bear market they are able to maintain their signature campaign, but I think it's difficult for the new gambling site. Getting a signature campaign now is kind of competitive, but I know market will bounce back soon, actually nobody knows when it will be bounce back but am sure it will be soon and new gambling sites will be able to market here again.

I think that a legendary member should know better in the issues about signature campaigns going off within the short time and beyond the expectations of promoters to stay longer. Most times new casinos try to find a way to bring their services to the forum even if they run for a week, they might have achieved a kind of awareness and they may decide to shut down the campaign and use other medium of publication.



Yes this is the simple fact about it. If they are starting up they may intentionally open a campaign for few weeks while they taste run the traffic generated via budget for the campaign and if they are not making satisfactory profit then they can go down. There are some that run for just a week and go off for like a month, I think Hhampuz managed such campaign in the past, blender.io. Also some test run and continue for a while like blackjack just to mention few. It is about choice, decision to budget and traffic that goes to the casino.

I don't think it's the bear market but the effect of the campaign itself. Those casinos are looking for fast effect that they want to evaluate just after running for weeks.
But, that's not how it goes because campaigns should be run for a long term for them to see how effective it is. Because if it's just for a few weeks of run, there's barely effect on it and members will easily forget about them.

Bear market has nothing to do with their marketing strategy, and I think the gambling itself has limit their budget for marketing and maybe the competition is very tough for signature campaign and that’s why they ended it early since the result is not good for them. The merit has been one of the requirement to qualify and we cannot blame this to the site or manager if we don’t have much merit, again if you want to participate with those signature campaign, try to earn more merit.

Some companies do test out to run some campaign as this was mostly been suggested by most people on this forum whenever there's a new gambling site around or do have their ANN threads which
this would be the main recommendation when it comes to marketing which it wont really be that a bad idea considering that this place has a good crypto traffic.Some do allocate big and some
wouldnt and just ran 1 week for some test up or  a little bit more.As for qualifications then its on managers call on whom to accept and its just common sense that having huge
merit number or count would always be having advantage compared to those who do have less.

Not necessarily in all cases. Some of them have a list of marketing strategy already planned and try them out one by one to see the one with the most yielding result. So it may just be that the signature campaigns on their list of planned marketing strategy is not the most effective (Most effective meaning, it can be effective, but not the most effective), hence the need to suspend the campaigns and focus on the other methods giving the best results.

There have been more gambling sites that have run a very short campaign. There could be various reasons why they didn't go through. Still, I think it can do some damage to a site's image. Then it might be even more convenient not to run a campaign at all if you have such plans or if your budget is not sufficient. However, there are also campaigns that have been active for a long time. I'm active in the 1xbit campaign myself, and they've had their campaign on the forum for almost a year if I'm not mistaken. There are multiple sites that have long campaigns. Of course it costs a considerable budget.

Perhaps it's the budget that they really wanted to allocate for advertising and nothing else. They launch, they want to get their platforms recognized, and when they think that the exposure is enough, they cut the signature campaign. There are tons of gambling platforms and other crypto services that has had their signature campaigns last for only a couple of weeks, but they are still thriving. Advertising your service is one thing, and maintaining it to stay competitive in this game is another. Or they assessed that signature campaigns here in the forum is not the way to go in advertising and there are other channels that they can use. Lots of reasons honestly, but I don't think the bear market has got something to do with it heavily, as this was always the case even during bull markets.

Actually the campaign was very low for now and bear market is some how reason for the less campaign now.When the people think about the bounty campaign,only few are trusted and most of them are fake.They just using people for the fake work.After couple of months,they send the dummy token.Which is not at all the useful one.People only allow others to learn from the mistakes.But mistakes are not a accidental one,it’s also the real one for now.

there are several cases where I've seen a project that also held a signature campaign event but stopped, usually they complain about the traffic getting from the signature campaign is not in line with the target that's why they switch to using other campaigns outside this forum in other ways, maybe that's what happened not only that we were in a bear market

I'm referring to sources I've read.


I am not referring to Software, Services, Casino Game Developers, Licenses as well as Payment Support, I speak as I know and as I have read.

The bottom line: online gambling customers bet regardless of the value, does not affect the gambling site, loyal customers and the most surviving gambling sites, simple reason, money rotates every second, thus gambling sites can operate a little longer with above average money rounds, the target is achieved.

Most of the time projects and casinos often run for a few weeks is mainly because they've evaluated it as not effective which in fact could be correct especially signature campaigns are more effective on the long run.

Other reason could also be that casinos and other projects hold or end their campaign as they are only trying to test things out. Another possible reason is that funds are much more needed on other sectors or department from which they cut off the budget for advertisements.

Even during the bull market signature campaigns were already scarce, limited and restricted. Maybe recently the competition just got more fierce due to the weak market's conditions, but without any doubts that is a existing problem since a long time ago. Moreover it's a demand and supply issue like in any other niche of jobs' market. Each new day more people get aware about bitcoin and cryptocurrency, being lead to this forum, so they discover signature campaigns and want to join them for extra income, while at same time the supply of new campaigns don't grow on the same proportion, therefore there aren't spots for everyone.

In general, people are facing similar situations on every fields they try to look for a job. That is the proof of disorganized and irresponsible population growth impacting daily life. There are too many people in the world for few jobs' spots. The ones who are able to get those spots are fine, but for the rest there is only misery and pain.

We can slightly assume the bearish season to have some impact on the longevity of a signature campaign but nevertheless tlwe must not forget that each campaign also have their own stipulated budget for carrying out a signature campaign and once they've got to the limit of this amount budgeted the campaign tend to stop, we can compare a particular casino gambling campaign with another because thier financial standings are entirely different from each other.


One thing most participant failed to understand is that they can't be the ones to dictate for the campaign manager, that's why they are called managers, you can't guess right the criteria used for the acceptance of a member but onky because that of the required merits is open to everyone to see, come to think of this, having a good number of Merits is actually a first indication that the user is a consistent quality poster with 120 days, secondly check by yourself the spreadsheet or trust dice campaign thread as see a number of participants accepted with lower merits especially on the sr member participants, did you asked yourself was it because of the merit they were accepted? Obviously no, the campaign manager have the insight to detect even those actually been active, regular and quality poster but with low Merits and consider them, also you can have a high number of Merits and ended up not being accepted because not everyone understands how to spread post across relevant boards required and not just posting only on a particular board consistently over time, i advise you leave the campaign managers to exercise their role base on the requirements of the gambling site team representative demands.

Most of the times, this is the reason. Casinos always have high expectations from the signature campaign while signature campaign is a long term marketing campaign which they don't want to understand.

OP, I don't think this is the right place to post it. You can move the post to service discussion instead. Also, you are giving free advertisement to bluechip which can be another reason.

No, this is not related at all. The campaign mentioned above does have a short duration, before that there has also been a gambling site campaign that has a short duration. I don't know the reason why the Campaign was stopped on the first and second Sundays, but that's the truth.
It all depends on each site, how long they want to hold the Campaign.

It's the casino's prerogative to stop their signature campaign for their own reason. There are lots of factors while some casinos only run their campaign for just a short period. It could be because of their limited budget or the ineffectiveness of the signature campaign on their site. There are still lots of highly reputable casinos that run their campaign for years and that simply means that a a signature campaign has a huge positive impact on the continuous success of their site.