Fairspin is known for doing short campaign period due to limited budget and I believe its same with the Bluechip and other casino that has a short term campaign. The bear market is not the reason to blame for this since there's still a lot of signature campaign that still running in long term regardless the market condition.
I'm certain that this scenario is due to limited funds of the casino that allocated on there campaign here since the payment is huge for a startup casino to maintain the campaign running for long term while getting only minimal result due to tough competition.
Topic: New Gambling Site has a Short Signature Campaign - page 4. (Read 512 times)
Team is always evaluating the result from the signature campaign. In my opinion if a signature campaign that has been running by a popular site will be going ever longer due to the numerous factors
The revenue from the platform will become main consideration to continue the campaign or not. Remember that only those big sites which have been getting millions dollars of revenue from the gamblers unlike the new sites which have been starting from the bottom.
This is also affecting the duration from the signature campaing that being launched before.
I think that any gambling platform providers have various reasons why the campaign was only going in a short time.
The revenue from the platform will become main consideration to continue the campaign or not. Remember that only those big sites which have been getting millions dollars of revenue from the gamblers unlike the new sites which have been starting from the bottom.
This is also affecting the duration from the signature campaing that being launched before.
I think that any gambling platform providers have various reasons why the campaign was only going in a short time.
This could be right, they are just probably seeing how the result would be upon applying what casinos does in marketing the casino in the biggest crypto forum.
They could be back in the campaign soon once they tried other marketing strategy. If they find out the signature campaign in the forum works better than the others campaigns they are doing, they might just put more allocation for sig campaign.
Casino doing a signature campaign in bitcointalk earns trust from the community which could be what they are evaluating for now.
Short or long term signature campaign running for several gambling casino site depend on
- Budget allocated
- Not effective
- evaluate with other advertising kinds
Does this bear market affect the finances of the casino sites as well, so they have a low allocation for signature campaigns.
I doubt it's the case since we've seen other casino campaigns that lasted longer and like what panjul said they probably want to make the most out of their budget which is understandable and if it doesn't work out it's better to stop it and look for other ways of promoting their casino as other casino campaigns have done before. I just think that it's likely they have other reasons to not continue the campaign aside from the bear market when you look at it in their position. 
Some time ago I saw a new gambling site appear with a signature campaign managed by the professional Manager like Hhampuz , Cryptobrainbross. Like campaign Fairspin, Bluechip (which I follow) both gambling sites didn't last long. Fairspin only runs for 2 weeks and Bluechip only runs for 1 week, and for several other signature campaigns it has also started to be held or ended.
I thought I'm the only one who noticed this, but its the management's decision to stop or continue the campaign, they have the stat so they know what action to take to continue or stop the campaign, either they want to test a short campaign and will come back in the future with a longer one, I have seen that happen on Blackjack.fun, or it did not reach their expectation and opted not to add additional fund for the campaign,
A signature campaign is still the best form of advertising it will not just die and the top casinos knows the importance of a continuous campaign through a signature campaign.
There can be some various reasons why some casinos did short campaign only such as:
Coming up to the bear market, I do not think it affects directly because I think every casino knows how to allocate their funds.
- Limited budget so they can do it for few weeks only
- Evaluation shows that the campaign is not effective for them, this reason can be because many other reasons
- Too much expectation from the owner to get quick effects from the campaign, it disappoint the owner so they decided to stop after 1-2 weeks
Coming up to the bear market, I do not think it affects directly because I think every casino knows how to allocate their funds.
Some time ago I saw a new gambling site appear with a signature campaign managed by the professional Manager like Hhampuz , Cryptobrainbross. Like campaign Fairspin, Bluechip (which I follow) both gambling sites didn't last long. Fairspin only runs for 2 weeks and Bluechip only runs for 1 week, and for several other signature campaigns it has also started to be held or ended.
Does this bear market affect the finances of the casino sites as well, so they have a low allocation for signature campaigns.
Does this bear market affect the finances of the casino sites as well, so they have a low allocation for signature campaigns.
Allocation is very important and additional allocation very much depends on the result of the campaign, for the campaign to have a good result it should be a minimum of one month campaign, let's admit it, the competition is very stiff in the casino industry, and those who can keep up with marketing will have the trust and edge against casinos that are not buying ads or launching a signature campaign, I don't think the bear market have an impact on the marketing gamblers will continue gambling the money keeps flowing in, if casinos cannot sustain a long campaign it's their decision if I am running a casino I definitely would like to have an ongoing campaign, branding, and visibility is always the key to gain new players.
Yo @OP Fairspin and Bluechip signature campaign was launched on the bear market, it's not like they was launched signature campaign when Bitcoin still worth $69K and then the next 6 days Bitcoin price sharply dump into $20K. So I'm not quite sure what the point you're trying to say since the Bitcoin price almost not changed when they launch their own campaign.
I think they just think if signature campaign is a bad advertisement and there's no progress for them, while we're know signature campaign is the best advertisement in this forum and you need to launch it for long term.
I think they just think if signature campaign is a bad advertisement and there's no progress for them, while we're know signature campaign is the best advertisement in this forum and you need to launch it for long term.
Some time ago I saw a new gambling site appear with a signature campaign managed by the professional Manager like Hhampuz , Cryptobrainbross. Like campaign Fairspin, Bluechip (which I follow) both gambling sites didn't last long. Fairspin only runs for 2 weeks and Bluechip only runs for 1 week, and for several other signature campaigns it has also started to be held or ended.
Does this bear market affect the finances of the casino sites as well, so they have a low allocation for signature campaigns.
One of the main reason as why new casino only run for a few weeks such as those that you've mentioned is that they are just trying to run a test campaign. This is quite normal especially that signature campaign isn't the only way to promote or advertise their platform. It is also a good thing as these signature campaign are recommended by various gamblers, bounty hunters, investors and other users in which they follow through. These campaigns usually comes back especially when the test campaign has provided good traffic and attracted users to their platform.Does this bear market affect the finances of the casino sites as well, so they have a low allocation for signature campaigns.
Bear market surely affect their finances however not in such a way that it will hinder them too much but in case it did, they'll surely prioritize the least functional.
Although the bear market has had a slight impact on some crypto-related websites, for example gambling sites, but I don't think that's the single factor that affects those gambling sites in terms of their assets.
so the advantage of gambling sites is only in betting and marketing signature campaigns to attract forum members to bet and try their gambling websites. and bear markets have little effect on gambling sites.I do not think so- most campaign signatures of gambling websites provide only a limited number of allowance allocated to it to necessarily "test the market." Again, the more members they recruit, the more chances of their gambling website being advertised across this forum.
In adherence to this situation, this is also the reason on why there are also some gambling websites that have an initial budget only planned for let's say 2 weeks, but they suddenly extended their campaign signature for more than 10 weeks due to the sudden boost of players after the "testing period" on the campaign.
Lucky if you have joined a signature campaign that has been running for a long time and with consistent payouts.
~snip~
It seems to me that it is not surprising that some signature campaigns end quickly, and some last a very long time. It is quite possible that the owners of gambling sites explore the market promotion changing their strategies and this is quite normal because only in comparison can you understand what kind of promotion more profitable.
If we talk about the state of the market, now many companies reduce not only payments but also reduce workers. So we wait for a bull market and try to worry less.
Team is always evaluating the result from the signature campaign. In my opinion if a signature campaign that has been running by a popular site will be going ever longer due to the numerous factors
The revenue from the platform will become main consideration to continue the campaign or not. Remember that only those big sites which have been getting millions dollars of revenue from the gamblers unlike the new sites which have been starting from the bottom.
This is also affecting the duration from the signature campaing that being launched before.
I think that any gambling platform providers have various reasons why the campaign was only going in a short time.
The revenue from the platform will become main consideration to continue the campaign or not. Remember that only those big sites which have been getting millions dollars of revenue from the gamblers unlike the new sites which have been starting from the bottom.
This is also affecting the duration from the signature campaing that being launched before.
I think that any gambling platform providers have various reasons why the campaign was only going in a short time.
Does this bear market affect the finances of the casino sites as well, so they have a low allocation for signature campaigns.
With the end of several signature campaigns, the competition is getting tougher. As in the Trus Dice campaign, which was managed by Hhampuz, only a few hours after it was opened, many people applied. and for sure those who have the most merit in the last 120 have a chance to be accepted. while those of us who are only able to collect a few merits are sometimes always eliminated and do not get a place.
With the end of several signature campaigns, the competition is getting tougher. As in the Trus Dice campaign, which was managed by Hhampuz, only a few hours after it was opened, many people applied. and for sure those who have the most merit in the last 120 have a chance to be accepted. while those of us who are only able to collect a few merits are sometimes always eliminated and do not get a place.
I do not think so- most campaign signatures of gambling websites provide only a limited number of allowance allocated to it to necessarily "test the market." Again, the more members they recruit, the more chances of their gambling website being advertised across this forum.
In adherence to this situation, this is also the reason on why there are also some gambling websites that have an initial budget only planned for let's say 2 weeks, but they suddenly extended their campaign signature for more than 10 weeks due to the sudden boost of players after the "testing period" on the campaign.
Does this bear market affect the finances of the casino sites as well, so they have a low allocation for signature campaigns.
Although the bear market has had a slight impact on some crypto-related websites, for example gambling sites, but I don't think that's the single factor that affects those gambling sites in terms of their assets.I've seen several discussions about gambling site assets. For me, gambling assets are very influential on visitors, this is also not much different from online gambling sites in general, whether or not gambling sites have been campaigning on this forum or advertise on foreign websites, I think the influence of visitors is to bet, not based on the bear market, the bear market only affects the value, but not the nominal bet, no.
For this reason, many gambling sites today are implementing the best features to attract visitors.
Some time ago I saw a new gambling site appear with a signature campaign managed by the professional Manager like Hhampuz , Cryptobrainbross. Like campaign Fairspin, Bluechip (which I follow) both gambling sites didn't last long. Fairspin only runs for 2 weeks and Bluechip only runs for 1 week, and for several other signature campaigns it has also started to be held or ended.
Does this bear market affect the finances of the casino sites as well, so they have a low allocation for signature campaigns.
Does this bear market affect the finances of the casino sites as well, so they have a low allocation for signature campaigns.
But there are other gambling casino signature campaigns that are running for months and years, and they still continue even in the bear market. Also bear market should not have much impact on gambling activities as the price of bitcoin is not directly related to people gambling and betting. They will continue to gamble and bet anytime.
I think this is more related to individual gambling sites as for how long they want to run the campaign, how much it was beneficial to them and also the funds they have allocated for marketing.
Some time ago I saw a new gambling site appear with a signature campaign managed by the professional Manager like Hhampuz , Cryptobrainbross. Like campaign Fairspin, Bluechip (which I follow) both gambling sites didn't last long. Fairspin only runs for 2 weeks and Bluechip only runs for 1 week, and for several other signature campaigns it has also started to be held or ended.
Does this bear market affect the finances of the casino sites as well, so they have a low allocation for signature campaigns.
With the end of several signature campaigns, the competition is getting tougher. As in the Trus Dice campaign, which was managed by Hhampuz, only a few hours after it was opened, many people applied. and for sure those who have the most merit in the last 120 have a chance to be accepted. while those of us who are only able to collect a few merits are sometimes always eliminated and do not get a place.
Does this bear market affect the finances of the casino sites as well, so they have a low allocation for signature campaigns.
With the end of several signature campaigns, the competition is getting tougher. As in the Trus Dice campaign, which was managed by Hhampuz, only a few hours after it was opened, many people applied. and for sure those who have the most merit in the last 120 have a chance to be accepted. while those of us who are only able to collect a few merits are sometimes always eliminated and do not get a place.
Jump to: