Thanks to all that replied to my above comment, it is actually enlightening to learn that they ones had payment issues some years back which resulted in a negative tag, I actually saw the nautral and positive tag sign, so, I didn't bother to check the details, thanks yahoo, for letting me know this, I did check after reading your comment and discovered that the casino owed a user $170k dollars, that is a whopping sum of money, but they managed to pay off a total sum of $16k dollar which personally, I consider to be very low compared to the actual amount they owed, but still, the user was kind enough to change his negative tag to nautral tag, I think right now, it's more understandable why they op ran out from this forum
.
Personally, I consider casino like this as a timed bomb waiting to explode, a casino that doesn't generate enough money to run the casino, and can't even pay ones if a users hits a winning above $10,000, but will have to pay the player on weekly bases or monthly until the entire wining amount is paid off, such casino can fold up and go bankrupt of out of luck, any users wins any amount above $100,000, they might not even be able to pay all the money.
The potential to exit scam (or genuinely fall in to financial difficulty and bankrupt themselves) is always going to be there with any casino.
The reality is bankrupt concerns are probably more towards casinos that are struggling to generate any useful income and maybe that is why Rocketpot never really succeeded (because their existing customers and new potential customers decided it was not worth the risk with medium to large deposits).
OK, to the first paragraph, I was actually going to say "but the risk and possibility of a casino going into bankruptcy is higher with or on casinos that are not generating what can be considered as enough income to cater for players winnings at ones, whether the amount be in the tens or hundreds of thousands of dollars".
But then, in your second paragraph, you already said same thing, so thank you.
And to my brother Wiwo, some comment above my first comment that you quoted I believe; suggests or points that there are actually some person whom are still playing on this casino, and that is actually the reason why I said what I said in the first line or sentence of my comment you quoted.
But then also, I think there is the possibility that it could just be family members still playing on this casino??? Lol.