AND the GRAPHS are amazing and very interactive.  Is there a way (or does it have sense), to group all local boards into a single cattegory? I'll look at this. Maybe I can add a way for you to select multiple boards.TryNinja is it possible to add trust feedback information for profiles on Ninjastic website, and also if user is active, inactive or banned? I would need to scrape every profile from time to time, so I prefer not (for now). If I could
TryNinja is it possible to add trust feedback information for profiles on Ninjastic website, and also if user is active, inactive or banned?
I am not sure if this is easy to add, but we don't need to much information, only basic stuff.
I'm actually starting to believe you are going to ban me from your threads for always being asking for stuff, but until that happens...
Is there a way (or does it have sense), to group all local boards into a single cattegory? It would make it easier to check a users' post history on local boards, instead of the current "select each local board manually and if something looks strange open multiple tabs with each language". PS: thanks for the highlight feature, it works like a charm It'd be a very helpful implementation to look for certain specific stuff so... refloating the petition! Sorry for the delay, I forgot to reply you.  I just added this feature.  I can't even image how difficult it is. I think it is. I'll look at it later today.It's just matter of convenience, but it is possible to bold text on the posts that matches the content/keyword? For example, if i use content/keyword "blockchain", all texts containing "blockchain" would be bolded automatically. It'd be a very helpful implementation to look for certain specific stuff so... refloating the petition! It will be interesting if you also process the quotes for which the original post has been deleted. There's always a chance someone faked a quote that was never made, but I haven't seen this happen (yet). I could do that:please sir 35hK24tcLEWcgNA4JxpvbkNkoAcDGqQPsP But now this address is linked to my profile and not to yours. The bot only cares about the actual author of the post (me).  Steak (and beans) please  14nknk1KNjRAK2LuZHx2QygR6anEu5b7ar The problem for processing the data is that not all quotes use the same format, some use code-tags too. I tried 2 years ago.
I think TryNinja's approach to this is valid. It's better to have a few false positives in a search results than to miss finding some related addresses.
It is up to scam/spam busters to do their own research and not rely solely on tools ~ That's too complicated. I don't think I'll ever tag an address as someone's official/staked address, so false-positives aren't really an issue. All I want to do is make it easier for the spambusters find out which addresses may be owned by each user.Instead of looking for addresses on someone's 300+ pages post history, you can go to their Ninjastic user page, get a list of addresses and easily cross-check them with other users while doing your own research. That's why those tools were created. It will be interesting if you also process the quotes for which the original post has been deleted. There's always a chance someone faked a quote that was never made, but I haven't seen this happen (yet). I could do that:please sir 35hK24tcLEWcgNA4JxpvbkNkoAcDGqQPsP But now this address is linked to my profile and not to yours. The bot only cares about the actual author of the post (me). Adding filters as to which addresses are displayed can be resource-intensive, while only displaying addresses posted in posts that meet certain criteria would be substituting your judgment for others'. ~ That's too complicated. I don't think I'll ever tag an address as someone's official/staked address, so false-positives aren't really an issue. All I want to do is make it easier for the spambusters find out which addresses may be owned by each user.Instead of looking for addresses on someone's 300+ pages post history, you can go to their Ninjastic user page, get a list of addresses and easily cross-check them with other users while doing your own research. That's why those tools were created. It will be interesting if you also process the quotes for which the original post has been deleted. There's always a chance someone faked a quote that was never made, but I haven't seen this happen (yet). I could do that:please sir 35hK24tcLEWcgNA4JxpvbkNkoAcDGqQPsP But now this address is linked to my profile and not to yours. The bot only cares about the actual author of the post (me). The other addresses: all not mine either, but I've posted them several times (in a table). Yeah, there isn't much more I can do to figure out what is really yours and what is not. People will need to look on the list and do their own research. Another thing I plan to add is priorize addresses on the big "staked addresses" topic.If someone posts more than one address in a post, they are probably not posting any of their own addresses. (this would be difficult to automate) If someone posts an address in a signature/bounty campaign thread, it probably belongs to them. In some subs, the likelihood of an address belonging to someone may depend on if they are the OP of the thread or not. For example, a lender may post the addresses they funded loans to in their lending thread. All the titles here link to https://google.com instead of the post. Is that a bug? Opss... fixed.   Quote Another thing I plan to add is priorize addresses on the big "staked addresses" topic. It will be interesting if you also process the quotes for which the original post has been deleted. There's always a chance someone faked a quote that was never made, but I haven't seen this happen (yet). Maybe it doesn't allow Tor-connections. That's probably the case. I'll reverse proxy the API through my server to fix that. edit: doneAt my user page, I'd expect to see only my own posts. Makes sense. I just changed that.All the titles here link to https://google.com instead of the post. Is that a bug? Opss... fixed. The other addresses: all not mine either, but I've posted them several times (in a table). Yeah, there isn't much more I can do to figure out what is really yours and what is not. People will need to look on the list and do their own research. Another thing I plan to add is priorize addresses on the big "staked addresses" topic. I use SoChain's api for the BTC balances and they are done on the client (for now). Maybe it doesn't allow Tor-connections.Quote This page actually shows every case where you mentioned an address, separately. I sometimes post long lists of addresses indeed.Quote If you want to know which addresses are most likely to be yours, it's better to check your user page Let's see:Code: BTC 1foreverDArUNEX2gVD26vautcx3b8zTZ (24) The first one makes sense BTC 1TarasQyKwPJRuod6qwh7n8BjMHC49ZNY (8) BTC 1MsY1HjLQQ6e8tiQZUyR5mdmShyWqGT7bk (7) BTC 1SubSiKMkZuqMBaCeqehVQ1zSunVBAER8 (7) BTC 1bL43dPysh1TXQBRrQHdQRyEwN5H7qFrE (7) The second one: When I click ">", it shows many posts made by Taras. At my user page, I'd expect to see only my own posts. This isn't my address, but I posted it several times indeed. All the titles here link to https://google.com instead of the post. Is that a bug? The other addresses: all not mine either, but I've posted them several times (in a table).
It's working for me. I use SoChain's api for the BTC balances and they are done on the client (for now).
If I search for my addresses, can you add the balance of each address too? I don't recognize most of them, but adding the balance might help to highlight what's interesting. Or even sort them by balance (apparently I have mentioned 6,723 addresses). This page actually shows every case where you mentioned an address, separately. For example, if you mention 2 addresses in your post, the count will increase by 2 and you will see two new entries (mentioned X address in post 123; mentioned Y address in post 123).If you want to know which addresses are most likely to be yours, it's better to check your user page, since it now has the top 5 addresses by number of mentions and also shows all the addresses only once (grouping all the posts where they were mentioned). I'm thinking about also adding an option to group all posts in the /addresses search page or just changing it all together to look like the one on the user page. I hope that's not too confusing.
Address 1FeexV6bAHb8ybZjqQMjJrcCrHGW9sb6uF shows Something went wrong... instead of the balance.
If I search for my addresses, can you add the balance of each address too? I don't recognize most of them, but adding the balance might help to highlight what's interesting. Or even sort them by balance (apparently I have mentioned 6,723 addresses).
New update:
-> Address page - Added BTC and ETH address balance. - Added ETH tokens balance. - Added copyable list of users who mentioned the address. - Added last token transfers, linked to the potential owners of the addresses (or user's who mentioned it).  -> User page - Top 5 favorite addresses. - User mentioned adresses are shown individually and all posts mentioning them are grouped together.  Something went wrong.. I tried to reset the cache again. I noticed the same thing, and I think I had the same or similar numbers 1487 posts in meta for last 7 days Ninja is fast like all ninjas so he fixed it fast and added new features. Good work Jump to:
|
