But the second {username} is not parsed.
Can you please check that?
Thanks, just changed that. Can you please check that?
Topic: Ninjastic.space - BitcoinTalk Post/Address archive + API - page 19. (Read 16671 times)
<...>
edit: You can now customize how you want the list to look like with variables and also limit the number of results.
Variables available: {number} {username} {uid} {count}
Examples:
edit: You can now customize how you want the list to look like with variables and also limit the number of results.
Variables available: {number} {username} {uid} {count}
Examples:
I don't know if it is a bug or a feature, but I am not able to use the same tag in the same line.
I wanted to do something like this:
Code:
1. [url=https://ninjastic.space/user/Paolo.Demidov] Paolo.Demidov][/url] [72]
To obtain this
Quote
So I tried this: 
But the second {username} is not parsed.
Can you please check that?
It gave me a crazy idea
Check my PM to you in Aug 2020 titled "OG and RMC". Guess it's been at the back of your mind.
It gave me a crazy idea: would you be able to add Statistical Methods for Natural Language Processing? It would be very cool to get the result for any 2 usernames selected!
Sounds fun and very complicated. I will take a look at it when I have some time. 
When I read this post:
I know, I know, it's very easy to come up with features that take a lot of work to implement, and a large amount of processing power to crunch the numbers. But I had to ask!
PN7 was exposed mainly on linguistic proof. FOMA worked hard to dispute it. I'm quite sure that this was an attempt to discredit such proof in case this type of link was ever established between his accounts.
It gave me a crazy idea: would you be able to add Statistical Methods for Natural Language Processing? It would be very cool to get the result for any 2 usernames selected!I know, I know, it's very easy to come up with features that take a lot of work to implement, and a large amount of processing power to crunch the numbers. But I had to ask!
Aren't those profiles usually granted the merit source status? Maybe it's time for a new round of them...
Merit sources are a political appointment. I'm saying people who invent things need more merit to award those they help.
Did you have some time to check the UTC thing from the other day? Just curious about that one
Yes, I think I know what is happening but I'll have to take a better look to fix everything related to timezones. If your device's time is on a different day other than UTC, it will use that day but with the UTC time, so it's a bit messy right now. For example:UTC: 27 Jan 23:00
Your local time: 28 Jan 03:00
You will see 28 Jan 23:00.
Now it's actually fixed. 
Thanks! Hope I don't have to come back anytime soon.Did you have some time to check the UTC thing from the other day? Just curious about that one
Working now, but I don't think I'm seeing the right results?
Now it's actually fixed. Aren't those profiles usually granted the merit source status? Maybe it's time for a new round of them...
I'm seriously thinking about asking to be one. I probably would have spent twice as many sMerits if I had a bigger stash. Fixed, thanks!
Working now, but I don't think I'm seeing the right results? Let me put an example:https://ninjastic.space/addresses?author=famososmuertos&board=27&child_boards=true --> shows only address (178T.....)
https://ninjastic.space/addresses?author=famososmuertos&board=130&child_boards=true --> shows 2 addresses (178T... and 1Hf...). It's the same user and board 130 is a child board of board 27
Once a profile has identified themselves as bringing value to the community (other than posting for personal gain) they should receive a merit "stipend" to hand out to those who help them bring the value.
Aren't those profiles usually granted the merit source status? Maybe it's time for a new round of them... I don't have any sMerits left, so here is a virtual *high five*!
Once a profile has identified themselves as bringing value to the community (other than posting for personal gain) they should receive a merit "stipend" to hand out to those who help them bring the value.
Found a new problem (who else...) while searching for addresses on child boards.
Fixed, thanks!I don't have any sMerits left, so here is a virtual *high five*!
Found a new problem (who else...) while searching for addresses on child boards.
https://ninjastic.space/addresses?author=Csmiami&board=27 Gives good results back (didn't know I had posted that many addresses, but OK).
However, when searching child boards: https://ninjastic.space/addresses?author=Csmiami&board=27&child_boards=true --->Something went wrong...
https://ninjastic.space/addresses?author=Csmiami&board=27 Gives good results back (didn't know I had posted that many addresses, but OK).
However, when searching child boards: https://ninjastic.space/addresses?author=Csmiami&board=27&child_boards=true --->Something went wrong...
I know you are sure so no point on asking whether you are, but then why did it update the graph now if it's 23:07 UTC?
Could you post a screenshot of this? Everything on the website is in UTC time.
I know you are sure so no point on asking whether you are, but then why did it update the graph now if it's 23:07 UTC?Quote
I could maybe add an timezone selector in the future (no promises).
This'd be cool Not to be picky, but how is the 00:00 time selected? Does the site read the computer time, or does it work on server time?
Everything on the website is in UTC time. I could maybe add an timezone selector in the future (no promises). ---
Yeah! Working even more perfectly now.Not to be picky, but how is the 00:00 time selected? Does the site read the computer time, or does it work on server time?
I'm just asking because I live in UTC+1, so it's 00:00 now and I see the stats have updated now.
I was checking some stuff in my profile, and I've seen that the "last 7 days" graph and table data don't match.
You're right. The 'last 7 days' graph shows the previous 168 hours (7 days) and the 'board table' shows the previous 7 days starting 00:00 of the first day, so the former covers a few less hours depending on when you view it. I haven't slept yet and it's already 8 am so I'll fix that later today. Thanks! edit: fixed the worst explanation ever. already feeling sleepy.
edit 2: it's fixed.
Hey!
I was checking some stuff in my profile, and I've seen that the "last 7 days" graph and table data don't match.
Graph shows 21 (I believe starting on Monday), and the table gives 28 (I believe that starting on Sunday). So the question is... shouldn't the same starting point be considered for both?
edit: both will show +1, I didn't realize this post would add up too
I was checking some stuff in my profile, and I've seen that the "last 7 days" graph and table data don't match.
Graph shows 21 (I believe starting on Monday), and the table gives 28 (I believe that starting on Sunday). So the question is... shouldn't the same starting point be considered for both?
edit: both will show +1, I didn't realize this post would add up too
Jump to: