In such cases, we will investigate to confirm it’s a legitimate situation and may ask for KYC only if absolutely necessary to rule out fraud. Once they can show it’s two different people, they'll be allowed to continue playing without issue. Our intention is to support genuine players while protecting the community against fraudulent activity.
I believe the problem is that users can't see whether your intention is genuine or not. I think this is probably solvable with time when your reputation increases, but is there really no alternative other than KYC? I mean if your team when to push for boundaries, this is one of the areas you can tackle and offer unique solutions for.
I remember talking about wallet-based identification in the past, where users would need their wallet signature and device ID as an identifier, although I'm not sure if people would like it. It's also easy to bypass, so that's that.
Thank you for your insight! We're fully committed to transparent, fair practices, and we understand concerns around KYC. We're continuously exploring alternative solutions, like wallet-based ID and device fingerprinting, to reduce the need for KYC, though these come with limitations. With time, as we build trust, we aim to keep pushing boundaries to find even better solutions.
I only hope this no-KYC casino can live up to its words eventually. We've seen many of them disappointing in the end, citing regulation. Didn't they know that before luring people into their platforms and letting them believe they had their back?
To be fair regulation is an issue for most of them. The government won't let them run their business without any KYC/AML process, unless of course they don't register their business in their area but it will be another issue of how to trust this new business with no license etc.
Personally, as long as they're upfront with how they handle things, I don't think it's a huge issue if a user accepts the terms. Sadly most casinos don't explicitly warn or tell users key details like KYC before they deposit so it complicates things. But yeah, only time will tell.
You’re absolutely right—regulations around KYC/AML are often required for licensed businesses, and transparency is key. We’re committed to being upfront about our KYC policy, and we only apply it under clear, specific conditions. Building trust takes time, but we believe honesty and transparency are the foundation.
I only hope this no-KYC casino can live up to its words eventually. We've seen many of them disappointing in the end, citing regulation. Didn't they know that before luring people into their platforms and letting them believe they had their back?
To be fair regulation is an issue for most of them. The government won't let them run their business without any KYC/AML process, unless of course they don't register their business in their area but it will be another issue of how to trust this new business with no license etc.
Personally, as long as they're upfront with how they handle things, I don't think it's a huge issue if a user accepts the terms. Sadly most casinos don't explicitly warn or tell users key details like KYC before they deposit so it complicates things. But yeah, only time will tell.
Honestly, if this casino proves to be reliable in the long term without being properly license, I still could see it being successful within the gambling community, specially those who are concerned with providing their person information to centralized entities and regulators.
Though, they must be very careful when comes to unpurposely providing liquidity money launderers and criminals with their casino, otherwise it could be just matter of time before their domain gets seized by either the European Union or the United States, in a similar manner to what happened to Chipmixer, even though the latter had nothing to do with gambling.
Also, this may be the first casino I have seen which openly claims to make their community to get involved with the resolution of conflicts between the house itself a other gamblers. In that sense, it is an innovation.
Agreed. A casino focused on privacy and reliability could appeal strongly to players wary of sharing personal information. However, navigating compliance carefully is essential to avoid unintended misuse by bad actors. Ensuring robust AML safeguards will be critical for long-term success and avoiding regulatory issues, especially given the risks of seizure similar to Chipmixer. Balance and vigilance are key.
