The only thing I can recall Rijk doing is the RTL Z interview.
https://www.rtlz.nl/cryptocurrency/gulden-moet-de-bitcoin-doen-vergeten
Our community is so good: noone bothered to translate it to other languages.
Why is Gulden failing? Because it's "a community driven cryptocurrency".
---
I have always learned that you should critize if you don't have a solution. So here it is Rijk:
Getting the word out.
Start doing conferences. If you are scared of a crowd, then just make the current spokesman a 'co-founder' instead of spokesman, and let him attend these events. Conferences and other events really like the word founder, not community member or gulden enthusiast.
(Re)gaining trust.
You said in the interview you wanted to do it better than Bitcoin. Then give us insights in your financial results. We don't know who Satoshi is, we do know who Rijk is. We just don't know wether your motives are changing the world, or changing your world. Show us how the crowdfunded Bitcoins are spent, if they are spent. Show us who is getting payed by Gulden BV. Show us how much. Start being transparant. Tell us about the premine. Start being honest.
We really need transparency.
---
Finally, a request to those who have been criticizing Gulden and Rijk on this forum. Please for a change: start enlighten us with the problems you see and how you would like to see them fixed (and please do not say: Rijk is the problem, he has to step down. Rather give some advice on how to improve)
I totally agree!
One small comment on the last sentence though: If I would get 1000 Gulden for every ban Rijk has done on people that have done just that, I could open up 50 witness accounts now!