Topic: No knowledge is lost. - page 6. (Read 1311 times)
I think without ICO has more success because they have funds already to start and operate their project and and they have resources that they need
the answer is actually simple because the ico project is only limited to fundraising but they use funds not 100% for projects that I'm sure of, but divided by personal needs and some of the funds are 100% for personal interests (scam) and it seems like if you want to keep following dwyor.
Many projects do not use public token sale. For example Telegram from Pavel Durov. A huge amount of money was raised but all the coins were bought by planned investors.
Please my fellow crypto friends I need answers badly about ICO and none ICO projects . my question to you all is
Why are projects with NO ICO always do better than the ones who were actually funded from ICO ? Projects with no funds or whatso ever should be the ones facing what ICO projects are facing excluding scams ones
Why are projects with NO ICO always do better than the ones who were actually funded from ICO ? Projects with no funds or whatso ever should be the ones facing what ICO projects are facing excluding scams ones
Like bitcoin, there is no ICOs and created by satoshi nakamoto and its open source. There is no CEO behind bitcoin and no authority can control the supply but bitcoin gain investor trust. I think its about trust from investor because investor must be invest on good crypto with good security
Please my fellow crypto friends I need answers badly about ICO and none ICO projects . my question to you all is
Why are projects with NO ICO always do better than the ones who were actually funded from ICO ? Projects with no funds or whatso ever should be the ones facing what ICO projects are facing excluding scams ones
Why are projects with NO ICO always do better than the ones who were actually funded from ICO ? Projects with no funds or whatso ever should be the ones facing what ICO projects are facing excluding scams ones
For example Ravencoin, this coin no premine, no ICO or fundraising and drive by community. The growth of this coin very amazing and the price always increase. Its good coin and i think this coin could be a profitable investment in the future because developers team always improve the platform
Please my fellow crypto friends I need answers badly about ICO and none ICO projects . my question to you all is
Why are projects with NO ICO always do better than the ones who were actually funded from ICO ? Projects with no funds or whatso ever should be the ones facing what ICO projects are facing excluding scams ones
Why are projects with NO ICO always do better than the ones who were actually funded from ICO ? Projects with no funds or whatso ever should be the ones facing what ICO projects are facing excluding scams ones
Many successful projects do not use ICO and I think you are right. But for now, the project without ICO is also very difficult to get investors. Investors are interested in investing because the ICO is able to raise large funds. So they think that the project can make a profit. But you must be careful in determining the project and before you join must do research.
Please my fellow crypto friends I need answers badly about ICO and none ICO projects . my question to you all is
Why are projects with NO ICO always do better than the ones who were actually funded from ICO ? Projects with no funds or whatso ever should be the ones facing what ICO projects are facing excluding scams ones
Why are projects with NO ICO always do better than the ones who were actually funded from ICO ? Projects with no funds or whatso ever should be the ones facing what ICO projects are facing excluding scams ones
It's not always. There were successful projects today that were once ICO's. It's not about on how these projects were funded. It's about the developers and team behind the projects. Non-ICO projects usually have good teams of developers and supports. This is one main reason to be successful.
Those projects that didn't conduct no ICO at all might be sincere with what they are trying to reach the people, whilst most of the ICO projects, they're all just for the collection of money. Scammers found a way to scam easily through ICO that's why that market is becoming dangerous these days. However, there's a reinvention through IEO.
And if I may add, some of those projects who didn't conduct ICO are those that has established platform already, and they have their own funds or private investors that are sustaining the project to operate. So they are bound to success because no matter what, they are not dependent from the funds of the public community. They can proceed with their developments on their own effort and money. Whereas, those who are conducting ICO are more than likely relying on the funds that they are getting from the people, and unluckily most of them fall in the scam category.
Please my fellow crypto friends I need answers badly about ICO and none ICO projects . my question to you all is
Why are projects with NO ICO always do better than the ones who were actually funded from ICO ? Projects with no funds or whatso ever should be the ones facing what ICO projects are facing excluding scams ones
Since You are comparing,then You should give examples of those projects that did not conduct an ICO.I know few such projects. Basically, these are projects that have been successful in IEO.And if you look at the picture in General, now there are few working projects at all(regardless of whether they conducted an ICO or not). Why are projects with NO ICO always do better than the ones who were actually funded from ICO ? Projects with no funds or whatso ever should be the ones facing what ICO projects are facing excluding scams ones
I think all project for the crypto in the world should need a huge money to start up for the development and operational for many sector. It cause the project held the ICO for find the investors that want to buy some their coin. But their project must be have an amazing or different something.
all projects really need huge funds and I think the project that is currently often successful is a project that has a platform to exchange, because I see a number of other platforms currently losing to the exchange platform. Please my fellow crypto friends I need answers badly about ICO and none ICO projects . my question to you all is
Why are projects with NO ICO always do better than the ones who were actually funded from ICO ? Projects with no funds or whatso ever should be the ones facing what ICO projects are facing excluding scams ones
Why are projects with NO ICO always do better than the ones who were actually funded from ICO ? Projects with no funds or whatso ever should be the ones facing what ICO projects are facing excluding scams ones
Ethereum was one of the most successful cryptos and it started with an ICO. Many projects have succeeded by raising funds in the start but I guess people favor a more fair pow coin that everyone can freely mine at the start.
Not all POW are successful, even those 100% premined and distributed to the community fail miserably if you look at the Announcement board of altcoin, there are lots of POW that had been long dead. OP statement is not true thus, making it incorrect.
Please my fellow crypto friends I need answers badly about ICO and none ICO projects . my question to you all is
Why are projects with NO ICO always do better than the ones who were actually funded from ICO ? Projects with no funds or whatso ever should be the ones facing what ICO projects are facing excluding scams ones
Why are projects with NO ICO always do better than the ones who were actually funded from ICO ? Projects with no funds or whatso ever should be the ones facing what ICO projects are facing excluding scams ones
i think its because a project who didn't run an ICO usually is a serious project mate
wich mean their team member always do the best for their project with their own money
but not all project with no ICO succed, sometimes the project failed too my friend
and learn all things about the project before decided to buy is the best idea
I think I understand what you are saying; let's take it like this, when you build a project with your funds it is likely to do well and as people starts investing you can expand and bring in more services. This can be likened to projects which didn't carry out any ICO but are doing well than their counterparts.
Also, there are other who couldn't list or build any MVP due to lack of funds. So I think it all depends on the team, what they knows and their capabilities.
Also, there are other who couldn't list or build any MVP due to lack of funds. So I think it all depends on the team, what they knows and their capabilities.
legendary
Activity: 2436
Merit: 1189
Need Campaign Manager?PM on telegram @sujonali1819
Please my fellow crypto friends I need answers badly about ICO and none ICO projects . my question to you all is
Why are projects with NO ICO always do better than the ones who were actually funded from ICO ? Projects with no funds or whatso ever should be the ones facing what ICO projects are facing excluding scams ones
Why are projects with NO ICO always do better than the ones who were actually funded from ICO ? Projects with no funds or whatso ever should be the ones facing what ICO projects are facing excluding scams ones
If you posted any examples according to your question we can understand really what you want to know. Mainly a good project depends on the developer's team, active team members, project vision and the product. But obviously, need fund to keep stand your project a long time and more improvement. So team members are trying to ICO to collect some money for project improvement. In this way, I want to say ICO project is better than Non-ICO/ Self funded projects. The self Funded project can be looks like Good for a little bit of time by making hype and by increasing the token price by any pump team but not for long term IMO. So if you want to know my opinion I will always choose the ICO project instead of Non-ICO project for making any investment. Thanks
Those projects that didn't conduct no ICO at all might be sincere with what they are trying to reach the people, whilst most of the ICO projects, they're all just for the collection of money. Scammers found a way to scam easily through ICO that's why that market is becoming dangerous these days. However, there's a reinvention through IEO.
And if I may add, some of those projects who didn't conduct ICO are those that has established platform already, and they have their own funds or private investors that are sustaining the project to operate. So they are bound to success because no matter what, they are not dependent from the funds of the public community. They can proceed with their developments on their own effort and money. Whereas, those who are conducting ICO are more than likely relying on the funds that they are getting from the people, and unluckily most of them fall in the scam category.
I think all project for the crypto in the world should need a huge money to start up for the development and operational for many sector. It cause the project held the ICO for find the investors that want to buy some their coin. But their project must be have an amazing or different something.
Please my fellow crypto friends I need answers badly about ICO and none ICO projects . my question to you all is
Why are projects with NO ICO always do better than the ones who were actually funded from ICO ? Projects with no funds or whatso ever should be the ones facing what ICO projects are facing excluding scams ones
Why are projects with NO ICO always do better than the ones who were actually funded from ICO ? Projects with no funds or whatso ever should be the ones facing what ICO projects are facing excluding scams ones
It seems that not always a project without ICO is successful, some time ago I followed the bounty of a project without ICO but unfortunately the project was a scam and I was very disappointed, even though the project was very convincing.
Usually this project without ICO is ready in terms of funds, and they are usually funded by investor partners. This kind of project is really really to develop the concept.
It's funny but that's the situation on ground. The reason is this, any project that is self-funded (no ICO) tends to do well as the team knows exactly what they want and how to go about it. That's why you will see the team launching new products or services every now and then, and when investors sees this will be attracted and thereby investing and helping the project to grow more. And in this self-funded projects it's hard to see scams because the team already have a goal.
On the other hand, most ICO projects tends to be another thing altogether, some will exit scam, some can't even offer any tangible results etc.
On the other hand, most ICO projects tends to be another thing altogether, some will exit scam, some can't even offer any tangible results etc.
Please my fellow crypto friends I need answers badly about ICO and none ICO projects . my question to you all is
Why are projects with NO ICO always do better than the ones who were actually funded from ICO ? Projects with no funds or whatso ever should be the ones facing what ICO projects are facing excluding scams ones
Why are projects with NO ICO always do better than the ones who were actually funded from ICO ? Projects with no funds or whatso ever should be the ones facing what ICO projects are facing excluding scams ones
That is what I check the ICO before investing or participating in their airdrop or bounties.
We can accept any form ICO for investment but we need to be little closer to understand which is correct ICO project for you. Your less knowledge on finding the good ICO makes the exchanges takes control over the crypto with the name of called IEO.
So please improve your knowledge finding good ICO. Now all ICO listing are fake and soon exchanges will fake you with the IEO.
Please my fellow crypto friends I need answers badly about ICO and none ICO projects . my question to you all is
Why are projects with NO ICO always do better than the ones who were actually funded from ICO ? Projects with no funds or whatso ever should be the ones facing what ICO projects are facing excluding scams ones
I think the projects that carry ICO and No-ICO are only for reference, it is not a method to judge the level of success and effectiveness of the project but it only comes from specific conditions. From the turn, the construction, the idea and the purpose of each team in the project. Everything, does not mean we will go through fake guys, scam. Be careful and carefully consider everything before embedding money in any project.Why are projects with NO ICO always do better than the ones who were actually funded from ICO ? Projects with no funds or whatso ever should be the ones facing what ICO projects are facing excluding scams ones
Jump to: