Topic: No knowledge is lost. - page 8. (Read 1311 times)
If one person or a group decide to develop a project from their on pocket, then it means they have a big plan for the project and are committed to seeing it progress so they can reap from it. On ther side, if a project is funded through ICO, the team contributed less and still jave huge sums of money and so in most cases, the commitment will less. My suggestion though
Most projects with no ICO always have private investors. Take for instance IOST, they did very well after listing on Binance. Project with no ICO doesn't mean nobody buys into their coin, private sale is even better off, especially when the vesting period for private investors is reasonable.
Of course you can really experience lose some money here in crypto if you do not know where you going to risk or invest like in an ICO,trading site and gambling site then more so better to do is study all about this little by little before you risk another thing it takes time so you need to be patience until you learn many here,Moreover there's a lot of users who really earn than lose money here
hero member
Activity: 2912
Merit: 541
Leading Crypto Sports Betting & Casino Platform
Please my fellow crypto friends I need answers badly about ICO and none ICO projects . my question to you all is
Why are projects with NO ICO always do better than the ones who were actually funded from ICO ? Projects with no funds or whatso ever should be the ones facing what ICO projects are facing excluding scams ones
Why are projects with NO ICO always do better than the ones who were actually funded from ICO ? Projects with no funds or whatso ever should be the ones facing what ICO projects are facing excluding scams ones
I don't think so. Every ICO has the same opportunity to become a scam in the future, and we don't know which project will do that. We only know when the project was running for a while, but there is no update news from the developer or the teams, and we don't know how the progress of the project.
At first glance I understand that if the project without ico they are really ready in terms of funds so that it is easy to carry out developments, while those who hold ico they are only ready in terms of concept while the funding aspect is still very much needed.
Okay, I already get what you really meant.
You could probably mean it is Bitcoin as it hasn't conduct any offerings but I guess you are wrong if you think that if someone conduct an ICO will at the end be failed, dead or left abandoned. The great start of ICO is when Ethereum did it, and look how better they are, though most from the past that those who conduct ICOs hasn't do any better or shall I say most fail.
I guess those who doesn't conduct an ICO are sure successful just imagine no set price has been given but value continues to increase an example of that is Bitcoin. But this days, I couldn't think if that will be possible again with no proper funding.
You could probably mean it is Bitcoin as it hasn't conduct any offerings but I guess you are wrong if you think that if someone conduct an ICO will at the end be failed, dead or left abandoned. The great start of ICO is when Ethereum did it, and look how better they are, though most from the past that those who conduct ICOs hasn't do any better or shall I say most fail.
I guess those who doesn't conduct an ICO are sure successful just imagine no set price has been given but value continues to increase an example of that is Bitcoin. But this days, I couldn't think if that will be possible again with no proper funding.
I do not really understand your point. In my opinion there is no project without ICO. Because ICO-funded projects are better and clearer than projects that have no ICO.
I also think that there are no projects without ICO, it is better to invest in projects with investments than to engage in such nonsense 
It would be better and perfect if you first learned about the ICO project, and then gave clear questions. Maybe you interpret the number of ICO projects that have failed, but that does not mean that all ICO projects are like SCAM. Please differentiate fundamentally first.
Thank you so much.
Thank you so much.
I do not really understand your point. In my opinion there is no project without ICO. Because ICO-funded projects are better and clearer than projects that have no ICO.
Please my fellow crypto friends I need answers badly about ICO and none ICO projects . my question to you all is
Why are projects with NO ICO always do better than the ones who were actually funded from ICO ? Projects with no funds or whatso ever should be the ones facing what ICO projects are facing excluding scams ones
Your question contains a hypothesis. But is this hypothesis true? Or do you have the results of a research on this issue?Why are projects with NO ICO always do better than the ones who were actually funded from ICO ? Projects with no funds or whatso ever should be the ones facing what ICO projects are facing excluding scams ones
The best project without an ICO is bitcoin.
The best project with ICO is ethereum.
I do not think that one of them is better than the other. In addition, the future will change market conditions. Who knows what will be better?
Maybe in the beginning days of crypto a self funded project maybe has a chance to succeed. But nowadays i think without proper funding for developing and marketing, success rate is below %1.
Do u mean non ICO is a self funded project? I think no project can survive when there is no exact funding. Thats why a project going for ICO because they want to be well funded and well known to the crypto world. It's also an advantage of project in ICO to be known but we can't deny the fact of many abusive project lurking that ended as scam.
All steps in the business must be accompanied by knowledge, small things in making decisions must be based, such as when we are trading in deciding to buy or sell based on knowledge of the market, charts and so on, without it just getting lost and just relying on luck
Pre-determined price is one of the factors that affect the success, most especially the prices of projects when listed on exchange.
There is now a particular custom that is common with most traders and investors, which is that, if a coin from just concluded ICO, is listed on exchange, it would not trade at exactly or even above the ICO price. Which is why you see some of them dump to as low as -x10 the ICo price, because they are after profit making, which might come when the price starts growing back to its ICO price.
Non-ICO coins on the other hand, when listed, their prices are determined mainly by the m
market, which in some cases might trade very high.
There is now a particular custom that is common with most traders and investors, which is that, if a coin from just concluded ICO, is listed on exchange, it would not trade at exactly or even above the ICO price. Which is why you see some of them dump to as low as -x10 the ICo price, because they are after profit making, which might come when the price starts growing back to its ICO price.
Non-ICO coins on the other hand, when listed, their prices are determined mainly by the m
market, which in some cases might trade very high.
Please my fellow crypto friends I need answers badly about ICO and none ICO projects . my question to you all is
Why are projects with NO ICO always do better than the ones who were actually funded from ICO ? Projects with no funds or whatso ever should be the ones facing what ICO projects are facing excluding scams ones
Why are projects with NO ICO always do better than the ones who were actually funded from ICO ? Projects with no funds or whatso ever should be the ones facing what ICO projects are facing excluding scams ones
Ethereum was one of the most successful cryptos and it started with an ICO. Many projects have succeeded by raising funds in the start but I guess people favor a more fair pow coin that everyone can freely mine at the start.
If you mean non-ICO as private funding than you are correct largely.
When projects are privately funded, they are also directly guided and looked over, they are made accountable for their work and the fiance are transparent.
While a ICO project is highly cryptic after their fund raise. Has no responsibility towards the investors and provides no transparency about the works and the wages of the team members.
When projects are privately funded, they are also directly guided and looked over, they are made accountable for their work and the fiance are transparent.
While a ICO project is highly cryptic after their fund raise. Has no responsibility towards the investors and provides no transparency about the works and the wages of the team members.
I am finding it difficult to understand what you mean by ico with no funds. May be bit of more explanation would help. Thank you
Sometimes, some developers just want to collect people's money through public sales and live off the fund, they actually have nothing to offer and at the end, investors will just be crying for the loss of their funds. Whereas some project that had no ICO nor premine are doing excellently well. Hyro had no public sales, Polymath had no ICO too, yet they are still very much around and doing well. Look at ETN, Ubex, Savedroid, Storique and many others that collected huge fund, what can they show for it? Certainly nothing.
Because no ICO projects have the higher chance of being fully dedicated to creaet a fully working product for their project, they funded the project themselves because they believe in their future, while ICO projects are just usually made for their bad intentions, but of course not all ICOs are like that but it is fair to say the most of them are scam.
I think he reffers to coins like bitcoin, Litecoin and Ethereum which not have an ICO and they are successful on long time and some of altcoins which don't need a ICO and have a great price and who buy early get a lot of profit if hold.
Jump to: