Topic: Not Craig Wright? Who did you expect? - page 4. (Read 3508 times)

Oh, really? so that doesn't make sense. But still I don't believe him. I would believe if he would say that he is one of team,developer of bitcoin.

Seriously, do you guys really not know who Satoshi is?

Like I said, he's a 28 year old NEET living in Akibahara, Tokyo. The reason he created bitcoin was because he wanted to become a mythical being and the greatest internet troll.

Craig Wright was hired by him to do all this, just because he wanted to see some drama. The previous times when satoshi was supposedly "hacked" on bitcointalk was really just Satoshi trolling people.

Craig may not be the real Satoshi Nakamoto but at least he has admitted in his interviews that there are people who have allegedly helped him with the creation of Bitcoin and I think it's very likely that Bitcoin is not developed by one single person and a group of developers have contributed to the project. And whoever has worked on the project can be called Satoshi. It's just my theory though.

agree with you overlord has disabled that account I believe. And considering how many times Satoshi's accounts have done Funny Stuff in recent years there's no way we could trust that account either.

Craig is not satoshi nakamoto, if he is claiming that he is satoshi nakamoto. I don't believe him, I will just believe him if he can log in that account today.
Or just make the last active change.

Craig Wright seems exactly like a guy who would use the blockchain technology to create virtual "beanie babies" that's value is mostly based on artificial scarcity. A smart fellow with questionable ethics and PhD in theology

so you think satoshi nakamoto is a person and can create bitcoin without any other people's help? few back years when bitcoin still developed by him is a hard years for satoshi,but i believe satoshi nakamoto is a groups

Good point. Yes I would like she looked like Cameron but i still think he's male. 

Season 3 was scheduled for this summer wasn't it ? 

....   serfs
I thought this was supposed to be the "intelligent" crowd that see's through all of the governments media spin and propaganda. Guess when it's all said and done, a pleb is just a pleb

A black lesbian of course

Satoshi is obviously a 28 year old Japanese NEET living in his parents' basement.

Yeah that would not be a hard thing to do for him, seems like its probably a group and the password is gone forever.

To me, it doesn't matter who the real Satoshi Nakamoto ends up to be. Also I don't think having a degree in Computer Science or wearing business suits fit the bill for the 'perfect' Satoshi because looks most often than not can be deceiving and this is a pretty common occurrence in the Bitcoin scene. Are we sure that Satoshi is male? 


'
Would you not like it if Satoshi looked like this?  By the way this is taken from the AMC TV series 'Halt and catch fire' it's a pretty good show about developing the first computers you should check it out.

Hmm, I missed that. I haven't seen a single post here or on Reddit that indicated they were opposed to Wright being Satoshi on those grounds. Do you understand that (1) he engaged in fraudulent back-dating of documentation in his December 2015 episode on this topic and then (2) was quickly exposed for having published a fraudulent "proof" in his May 2 blog post? That is what people honed in on very quickly.

Wright looks like a more sedentary version of me too, and to be honest I also gravitate towards the expectation that Satoshi will turn out to be a boring and rather clean-cut middle-aged white guy rather than a long-haired druggie. Though I want to be careful not to project my prejudices insofar as they are based on comparatively weak lines of inference.

Well, would Satoshi suggest that the community rely upon a third party to validate information contained within the ledger?  That is a major sidestep from the philosophy that seems to have sparked the blockchain's creation.  And, for anybody to suggest that a third party (BBC, The Economist, GQ, Gavin, Matonis....etc) should be the first authentication factor to validate ledger transactions is suspect at best.  Would the person who conceptualized a ledger to eliminate third party involvement rely upon a third party to communicate to the network?  Wow!

So, it doesn't matter what he looks like, it's the fundamental underlying philosophy of bitcoin here that matters, which is at odds with Craig Wright's claims.  You're right...he doesn't owe the community anything, but we've given him too much already!  So, bring on the next person who wants to test the validity of bitcoin....the ledger doesn't lie, the ledger can't be fooled, and the ledger doesn't need a third party to validate its contents....(shhhh--whisper--it's trustless)  If Craig Wright is Nakamoto, all he's proven is that bitcoin cannot be broken, even by the great one himself.  

Bitcoin created Satoshi like the Illiad and Odyssey created Homer.  Sometimes the works of men become greater than the men who created them. That's what bitcoin has become, so every man will fall short when compared to bitcoin's enormity.

Satoshi is not craight wright,and i just expect that people who claim as satoshi nakamoto is satoshi it self,i wish he claim it by use any strong proof,not just sign message,but i wish he could give us some picture when he start with bitcoin,its would be very awesome experience.

Ok so I'm getting tired of all that bullshit about Craig being Satoshi and it's not about the looks of the guy but the crap that he is talking and not giving enough of an evidence to believe him.
The only explanation that I have (and it's only a theory of mine) is if he really is Satoshi, he did all that crap lately because he don't want someone to ever again trust him as being Satoshi + sending all of us a message to never trust Gavin or someone else. Meanwhile he may move coins if he want to, but he is just enjoying the nonsense and maybe laughing while chilling with his 1 million coins next to him.     Just imagine if all that is part of HIM to make ppl think that he IS NOT SATOSHI - thats my explanation so far about all this shit. Anyway he still looks like a wannabe Satoshi now and we may never find the truth. Maybe he is, maybe he isn't - Even if he manage to have the PGP key of Satoshi, it will not prove he IS him because it all may be some government inside job, killing the real satoshi and stealing/hacking his keys and shit so we will never know for sure. So please stop with this crap already - the guy probably is a Joke and he doesn't deserve that much attention after all the crap he said...

Our overlord here has disabled that account I believe. And considering how many times Satoshi's accounts have done Funny Stuff in recent years there's no way we could trust that account either.

If he is Mr Satoshi, don't you think he should log in to his account here?

https://bitcointalksearch.org/user/satoshi-3

Pressure.

What does he owe the "community" ? Absolutely nothing.
Why ? Because (even here) there is no community.

Maybe Gavin and a few others who shared and worked tirelessly toward the original vision. But not the "community". His responsibilty, just like the rest of us, is primarily to himself and his loved ones - and maybe by attending to that duty we might all better serve one another.

What people can't get their heads around is the desire to remain free - when/because , and in the lingo of Jean Paul Sartre (him that turned down the Nobel Prize, remember ?), most of us choose to live in bad faith.

What baffles me is that in a "community" based around a protocol that espouses/has baked in the promise/hope of liberty and a decentralised and distributed consensus that Satoshis sensibility should be so derided.

Wether Craig Wright is the man or not, he's right - Satoshi is dead.