Pages:
Author

Topic: [NRS|NoirShares] POW ENDING at 50k | DACs | MANDATORY WALLET UPDATE 6/23/2014 - page 2. (Read 141590 times)

hero member
Activity: 756
Merit: 500
WHAT IS THE CURRENT STATUS OF THE 5TH/S MINING OPERATION?

GENERAL FUND HOLDERS HAVE NOT SEEN ANY PAYOUT OR INFORMATION ON THIS "VENTURE" IN QUITE SOME TIME NOW.

(AND, STILL NO ACCOUNTING...)
hero member
Activity: 540
Merit: 500
Don't forget to move your NRS off of the exchanges!

Here is the latest wallet for NRS if you need to update before moving:

https://docs.google.com/file/d/0BwGL9FkcBurESEtVVUtuTFNmTWs/edit




We made a small announcement for NRB holders, so if you know any please send this link to them.

https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.8681662
legendary
Activity: 882
Merit: 1000
Please use notepad++ or Geany or any text editor that can handle csv file format to open the above link.

This marks the start of a three day countdown to the final snapshot.

Please move your NRS and NRB to your local wallets in time for the snapshot on 09/09/14 00:00 GMT.

legendary
Activity: 882
Merit: 1000
Please confirm your NRS balances in the linked document.

NoirShares Balances 11:32 GMT 1/9/14

And NRB here

NoirBits Balances 11:32 GMT 1/9/14

use a text editor like geany, or notepad++. or if you wish, add a file extension like .txt if you wish to use any other software
legendary
Activity: 882
Merit: 1000
As I don't have more time to read posts,  I'd like to have some newsletter to know what has happened and what will happen.

Very soon, within the next 4 days. Just having a hard time with investor dividend mapping on the chain.
hero member
Activity: 1162
Merit: 568
As I don't have more time to read posts,  I'd like to have some newsletter to know what has happened and what will happen.
hero member
Activity: 540
Merit: 500
Hey guys,

I think I need to clarify the differences between the leading vote options.

OPTION 1

"Yes build on top
by barwizi"

This option basically means that Noirlotto, any other DAS/DAC, and GF shares are put on top of the NRS blockchain. In the case of Noirlotto this means that it will use NRS as its currency, in turn increasing
the demand for NRS. This would be the same for most DAS/DAC's. The GF shares on the other hand are colored coins on top of the NRS codebase. There is no loss of GF share value, in fact they are now exchangeable as tokens.
This also makes payout to GF holders much more automated.

This option also involves a NRB relaunch, with a few features, new algo, and redesign. All of which is near done. After the relaunch NRB will only be slightly maintained by NG. Only critical updates. We then give NRB holders
a SMALL (maybe 1%) of NRS in a merge for the big NRS update. So, we keep our promise to the NRB, and give them a little bit of NRS.


OPTION 2

"Merge NRB and NRS and make a new one using them as a sharebase
by root1"


This option is the SAME as OPTION 1 besides one thing. No NRB relaunch. What difference does that make? It means giving NRB holders a much bigger % of the NRS in the merge to keep our promise to them. This
leads to a loss in value to NRS holders.



Please make sure this is what you want as OPTION 2 is in the lead. If you wish to extend the vote we can.
legendary
Activity: 882
Merit: 1000
final 24 hours of voting, much support for a merge of NRS and NRB. There is the suggestion of other coins , which would you pick?

Are we willing to add a few coins to our list or do we prefer to go with just our two.

24 hours people. This train is ready to go
legendary
Activity: 882
Merit: 1000
I have all of my NRS in one wallet split between two addresses. How will this situation be affected by the merge?

No effect at all, you'll just have to import two keys
newbie
Activity: 8
Merit: 0
I have all of my NRS in one wallet split between two addresses. How will this situation be affected by the merge?
legendary
Activity: 882
Merit: 1000
Will nrb not be reintroduced soon enough with a pow phase?
That's what I've been waiting for.
Hell, I'll lose a substantial chunk of my position by the sounds of how everything will unfold, but you don't see me complaining..
Wouldn't merging tend to increase the price of nrs in turn creating gf holders just as much income as a new chain as they hold nrs and receive gf payments in nrs?

Trust me, you'll love mining the new NRB if you are pro-CPU. I still have a few tid bits to work on, to make it even more interesting, but even now i can hash out a new g-block and we can get this party going.

Merging will have the effect of increasing the money supply by 10% at the moment, but potentially increasing the user base and intrest in our projects ten-fold. Coupled with all the features and ideas that will be in Phase 1 and 2, all we need is a good marketing strategy and we'll go higher than before.

The economics makes some assumptions, but i think the variance is acceptable.

On a technical point, i think everyone would prefer me and any other developers who join us to focus on one codebase at a time.

Depending on the success of this release, we may go further a few weeks later to release the business suite, with obvious benefits to GF share holders, NRS would also be considered.


please tell me there no more mining , the last time ou change any thing every thing went to shit ...

ALSO What happening with the DAC



1) Please read the "About" in your QT.

2) Please read the last 2-3 pages.
sr. member
Activity: 379
Merit: 250

Frigga77    0.0052    9kTNKupFu5jCKzCBJCAQzETKHdUCU7EK6K   1KkXuzhkDgJFactcX9tT2GuZLi2uZT1v86

Investors please confirm your addresses, these will be hard coded, so make sure to keep them safe as it would require a hard fork for you to get your dividends if you lose the addy.

If your addy has changed , please send a pm. On that note, make sure these are not exchange addresses as well. 

Confirmed.
hero member
Activity: 599
Merit: 500
Will nrb not be reintroduced soon enough with a pow phase?
That's what I've been waiting for.
Hell, I'll lose a substantial chunk of my position by the sounds of how everything will unfold, but you don't see me complaining..
Wouldn't merging tend to increase the price of nrs in turn creating gf holders just as much income as a new chain as they hold nrs and receive gf payments in nrs?

Trust me, you'll love mining the new NRB if you are pro-CPU. I still have a few tid bits to work on, to make it even more interesting, but even now i can hash out a new g-block and we can get this party going.

Merging will have the effect of increasing the money supply by 10% at the moment, but potentially increasing the user base and intrest in our projects ten-fold. Coupled with all the features and ideas that will be in Phase 1 and 2, all we need is a good marketing strategy and we'll go higher than before.

The economics makes some assumptions, but i think the variance is acceptable.

On a technical point, i think everyone would prefer me and any other developers who join us to focus on one codebase at a time.

Depending on the success of this release, we may go further a few weeks later to release the business suite, with obvious benefits to GF share holders, NRS would also be considered.


please tell me there no more mining , the last time ou change any thing every thing went to shit ...

ALSO What happening with the DAC

legendary
Activity: 882
Merit: 1000
The git was public until two days ago. Well, how about that? I make a GUI that is useless.....to gain what?
So what is the link to the github source?
see the words directly above your question, they should sufficiently answer you.
So what was the reason to remove the github source?
And when will the new wallet with the lotto and vote code be available? What is the time path?

It wasnt removed, i just made the git private. There has always been a problem before launch where people pm me asking me why the compiled but it's not working. It's irritating at best. As far as i am concerned the code is ready for alpha testing. On thursday i hope to have a win64 build, once this is available, i will give out to a few investors and the active posters in this thread to help with deployed testing of all features.  

if this doesnt work out, (not willing to accept untrusted people to build for us, since they may add some "sauce" to it. ) we can still have our linux users test out and report back to the group. if you dont use linux, but want to test, just throw it in a vm.

Another reason is the last part i want to add, the investor dividends. that must remain as group property.
sr. member
Activity: 379
Merit: 250
The git was public until two days ago. Well, how about that? I make a GUI that is useless.....to gain what?
So what is the link to the github source?
see the words directly above your question, they should sufficiently answer you.
So what was the reason to remove the github source?
And when will the new wallet with the lotto and vote code be available? What is the time path?
sr. member
Activity: 462
Merit: 250
Quote
so this screenshot in no way is proof for having implemented lotto and vote


What is it proof of?

Quote
which is at most a 30 minutes job for a good developer

Err, not quite, maybe half a day.

How do you propose i show you the back end? Screenshots of code?

While i understand your reluctance to believe in miracles , i think that you are now just being unreasonable. short of inviting you to a coding session, i doubt anything will satisfy you.

I am willing to try, so long as what you suggest does not take time from my planned activities, so....how do you want me to prove it. Screens of the working client are not enough clearly.

So I am being unreasonable if I am reluctant to believe that behind this screenshot is a working system? We will see. When is the client going to be tested / implemented? Is there a link to the github source?

Don't try to use logic with him, you just get a run around and no answers in the end.

The guy is just trying to squeeze more BTC out of investors.

He shows no accountability every time he is asked for data to backup his claims.

Scam and dump 101
legendary
Activity: 882
Merit: 1000
Quote
so this screenshot in no way is proof for having implemented lotto and vote


What is it proof of?

Quote
which is at most a 30 minutes job for a good developer

Err, not quite, maybe half a day.

How do you propose i show you the back end? Screenshots of code?

While i understand your reluctance to believe in miracles , i think that you are now just being unreasonable. short of inviting you to a coding session, i doubt anything will satisfy you.

I am willing to try, so long as what you suggest does not take time from my planned activities, so....how do you want me to prove it. Screens of the working client are not enough clearly.

So I am being unreasonable if I am reluctant to believe that behind this screenshot is a working system? We will see. When is the client going to be tested / implemented? Is there a link to the github source?

The git was public until two days ago. Well, how about that? I make a GUI that is useless.....to gain what?

So what is the link to the github source?

see the words directly above your question, they should sufficiently answer you.
sr. member
Activity: 379
Merit: 250
Quote
so this screenshot in no way is proof for having implemented lotto and vote


What is it proof of?

Quote
which is at most a 30 minutes job for a good developer

Err, not quite, maybe half a day.

How do you propose i show you the back end? Screenshots of code?

While i understand your reluctance to believe in miracles , i think that you are now just being unreasonable. short of inviting you to a coding session, i doubt anything will satisfy you.

I am willing to try, so long as what you suggest does not take time from my planned activities, so....how do you want me to prove it. Screens of the working client are not enough clearly.

So I am being unreasonable if I am reluctant to believe that behind this screenshot is a working system? We will see. When is the client going to be tested / implemented? Is there a link to the github source?

The git was public until two days ago. Well, how about that? I make a GUI that is useless.....to gain what?

So what is the link to the github source?
legendary
Activity: 882
Merit: 1000
Quote
so this screenshot in no way is proof for having implemented lotto and vote


What is it proof of?

Quote
which is at most a 30 minutes job for a good developer

Err, not quite, maybe half a day.

How do you propose i show you the back end? Screenshots of code?

While i understand your reluctance to believe in miracles , i think that you are now just being unreasonable. short of inviting you to a coding session, i doubt anything will satisfy you.

I am willing to try, so long as what you suggest does not take time from my planned activities, so....how do you want me to prove it. Screens of the working client are not enough clearly.

So I am being unreasonable if I am reluctant to believe that behind this screenshot is a working system? We will see. When is the client going to be tested / implemented? Is there a link to the github source?

The git was public until two days ago. Well, how about that? I make a GUI that is useless.....to gain what?
sr. member
Activity: 379
Merit: 250
Quote
so this screenshot in no way is proof for having implemented lotto and vote


What is it proof of?

Quote
which is at most a 30 minutes job for a good developer

Err, not quite, maybe half a day.

How do you propose i show you the back end? Screenshots of code?

While i understand your reluctance to believe in miracles , i think that you are now just being unreasonable. short of inviting you to a coding session, i doubt anything will satisfy you.

I am willing to try, so long as what you suggest does not take time from my planned activities, so....how do you want me to prove it. Screens of the working client are not enough clearly.

So I am being unreasonable if I am reluctant to believe that behind this screenshot is a working system? We will see. When is the client going to be tested / implemented? Is there a link to the github source?
Pages:
Jump to: