Topic: [NSFW] Girls of Reddit's r/GoneWild - page 8. (Read 144795 times)

Put it up at http://www.dailymotion.com/ and http://vimeo.com/

They both seem to have more relaxed policies about what's acceptable in a video.

They would have to go out of their way to use specific user addresses for change, and it would serve no purpose to do so.  The client makes up a new change address for every transaction, so it's reasonable to think that instawallet isn't using user deposit addresses for change.

I'm fairly certain we can get BeOpenWithYourelf's bitcoin's back... she neglected to bookmark her wallet URL properly, it looks like... I have fixed a potential problem with them trying to use the example instawallet URL in the instructions (broke it with unicode).

Perhaps the facebook wallet app is an alternative too. I'll have to go back and try that again.

Edit: http://bitcoin-app.com/

Ding ding ding. That's what i'm looking for.. I uploaded to depositfiles, but it would be nice to have a streaming provider to watch it directly, that won't ban mildly adult content.

Just for record keeping... http://ssdepositfiles.com/files/sdcp1urah

I applaud everyone on their initiative.  But this is still way more complicated than it has to be.  I'm sure we bitcoin enthusiasts can handle it but the girls posting are having problems and money is being lost.  

http://btctip.com uses the twitter API to allow users to load their account, then tip people using tweets.  Those tipped can log in with their twitter account and then withdraw the bitcoins that they were tipped.  Does the reddit API allow for something similar?  I'm imagining something where I can load the site with a couple coins, then the site tips submitters of content that I upvoted with an amount I set (maybe .01 bitcoins per upvote?).  And it scans my comments the way btctip.com scans tweets for a code for tipping if I want to tip more than the upvote amount.  Then whoever I tipped can log in to the tipping site via the reddit API and withdraw their coins.

Anybody familiar with the reddit API know if this is possible?

reupload again or use a different video hoster.

People still use FTP?

Wow. Really nice pics

why not just buy a cheap web hosting account? you can give the girls their own ftp accounts to upload content

FUCKING CUNTS AT YOUTUBE, THANKS TO PURITAN DOUCHEBAGS, REMOVED OUR BELOVED LADYBYTES VIDEO.

Options?


edit: Well, the removed the first instance I posted.. it's still up at the new location(throw away account), but it's just a matter of time)

Thanks, but that far was covered in messages by DeathAndTaxes and payb.tc ... now I was trying to get confirmation that deposits are exclusively from donations and they don't use user accounts to shuffle change. Well, looks like that would be the simplest behaviour to implement so I guess that's the case.

If she checks her instawallet balance, the 1BTC will still be there.

What blockexplorer is doing is the equivalent of reporting on the movement of individual chunks of bitcoins.  Your bank doesn't keep track of where the individual dollar bills go, so there's no equivalent of the blockexplorer report available from the bank.

What instawallet is doing is giving each user their own bitcoin address to deposit to, so that they know which instawallet account to credit when people send coins.  But all the coins end up in one big bitcoin wallet at instawallet.  When someone else comes along and makes a withdrawal from instawallet, they will make the withdrawal from their bitcoin client, which has access to everyone's funds.  The client will decide which coins to use, and will probably use coins deposited by someone else, just like the bank give people dollar bills they got from other customers.

Instawallet keeps track of how much is in each user's account, much like the bank does, but neither the bank nor instawallet makes any effort to make sure that they keep each users funds separate.

Basically, the bottom line is don't look at blockexplorer and expect to see anything meaningful about account balances.  All your seeing is details about the movements in and out of individual bitcoin addresses, which don't correspond very closely to instawallet accounts.

true... and I almost feared the quality would degrade. gladly not

two more girls until our bounty is paid... make sure you get your bounty donations in before it dispurse the funds. these latest girls are amazing.

I hope that I can also bind some girls to http://bitmit.net/en/shop/c/27-services/1-erotic . So if you want some individual stuff from a girl check it out

can you imagine an x billion dollar communication network JUST because of the porn network effect?

Wow... 6 girls have received a potential total of $360 so far. That's $60 per photo.

100 redditors have contributed a average $3.60 each (I didn't bother to count the actual transfers into the 6 addresses.

When you consider that a lot of this money was not just for ThanksFapping, but the novelty and appreciation to the girls for trying something new and becoming a part of the Bitcoin community (and economy), I think this is some cheap entertainment and publicity for Bitcoin - and a good profit model for the girls!

Can you imaging a 10 billion dollar bitcoin economy JUST because of the porn network effect?

That's supposing instawallet doesn't use that account to give change from others' transactions, right? because, since they're book-keeping in a parallel balance, that could be the case.

Well, I guess there's no good reason to do that.

Trying to determine CURRENT balance based on blockchain won't work for the reasons given.  The address instawallet (or any exchange) gives you is simply the deposit address.  So theft or no theft there is no way to know how much or when funds were transfered or current balance.

Still any script that looks for tx TO the deposit address is looking at how much was GIVEN not the current BALANCE.  The amount donated/given will be exactly accurate however no public stat can tell you someone's balance (unless funds never move).

I see. So stats based on the public address won't be accurate as her balance is split by several instawallet-controlled addresses. That was the whole premise, wasn't it? I mean, the script posted before looks at her transactions based on blockchain.info while that's not their actual balance, though it may roughly be.