Pages:
Author

Topic: nWoCrypto is a scammer, NWO is a scam! - page 5. (Read 5415 times)

full member
Activity: 126
Merit: 100
August 29, 2014, 02:33:08 AM
#51
Just out of curiosity did anyone stop to think that an exchange cannot force a dev to stick around? Can you predict the future?  Or is this concept too hard to grasp?  All I see here is a bunch of people crying over an exchange when it was the dev who ran off... .how the hell do you expect refunds when dev has the money and this is crypto if you want refunds go back to fiat and the trust system you obviously have no place here.

Crypto doesn't mean a safe sanctuary for scammers.Since crypto is not regulated by any organisation or govt its members, community,pools and  exchanges should come forward and devise some guidelines to safeguard the interests of miners and investors.

In this case an exchange, a big organised organisation is/was in better position to have some guidelines to safe guard the interest of it's traders.And failing to do so they should take the responsibility of the scam.

So you are basically saying an exchange should cover the losses of developers that run off? You do realize how stupid that is right? How would any exchange force anyone to continue development of any coin, if you know of a way to force people to do things then you have figured out something amazing and unheard of. The dev showed their ID, promised the exchange to deliver the wallets and networks, then took off with the funds while the coding dev dumped his 200k they were supposedly using for a anon mixer. I'd like to know how anyone could predict this scenario with 100% certainty and then guarantee that for investors in decentralized monetary system......

An exchange as compare to  members or pools are professional organisation and they must have some guidelines to protect the intrest of it's traders -

-Why they have released all the funds immediately to a dev verified by them despite of recent scams?

-Why they didn't warn the investors of the risks associated with it?

Investors bought it not on the reputation of the newbie dev,but they bought when they saw "verified by an exchange". So it's responsibility belongs to the exchange not that anon ,newbie dev.

The exchange simply can not shrug off the issue and say it's not my responsibility.

They should devise the proper guidelines for an ICO or even listing a new coin.

And here in this case try to compensate, either partly or fully.
hero member
Activity: 644
Merit: 500
August 29, 2014, 02:19:04 AM
#50
CCEX cheated all of us?Huh

No NWO coin owner cheated u all. Read the title from this topic...
legendary
Activity: 1148
Merit: 1000
August 29, 2014, 02:17:36 AM
#49
CCEX cheated all of us?Huh
hero member
Activity: 644
Merit: 500
August 29, 2014, 02:09:36 AM
#48
I have sent a PM to Pride-C-CEX  who had verified the nwo dev,,,, all we need to do is asking him to refund ......take responsibility

Im sure he will try to get a refund from the dev and when the dev refuses maybe will reveal the scammers ID. I think there may be laws against that though, breach of privacy laws ? Who knows I'd be shocked if the dev returned the funds though so don't hold your breath.
do you know him?? is Pride-C-CEX a good guy!

Do YOU know him ? After all they're just making money from fees.. This could have happened on every exchange but that "verified by.." thing is a problem from c-cex.. This was like the third or fourth scam ..

Well the thing is, c-cex did what they should do i guess.
The problem is that they can do nothing about it, they can not spread an ID card on the internet, they can not go to the police ( i dont know where c-cex is located, if it is China, and the scammer comes from Africa, you can do nothing against the scammer ).

Cryptocurrencies is based on 99% trust. And it's hard to get trust in a new coin, many people want to earn fast money (ofc who doesn't) and start mining new coins because of the low diff, but are pissed when dev run away.

So the option is to let a company controll the cryptomarket and make laws to punish scam dev's.
BUT then a whole group will scream because they dont want the cryptomarket get controlled by a company ( what is most of the time from the gouvernment )

In short words, i think we can do nothing about this dev. Just nothing, its a lesson to NEVER EVER join an ipo.
If some1 on the street i dont know come to me and say: ej if u pay me 1000 euro, i will make it 2000 for you... Then i'm just dumb if i give him that 1k euro, and that's the SAME as IPO. Never ever pay without having the result before, also an nice OP is zero result.

At the end it's the responsability from the people to give money to an unknown person, so crying after when the unknown person runs away doesn't help you.
legendary
Activity: 2660
Merit: 1240
August 29, 2014, 02:07:01 AM
#47
I have sent a PM to Pride-C-CEX  who had verified the nwo dev,,,, all we need to do is asking him to refund ......take responsibility

Im sure he will try to get a refund from the dev and when the dev refuses maybe will reveal the scammers ID. I think there may be laws against that though, breach of privacy laws ? Who knows I'd be shocked if the dev returned the funds though so don't hold your breath.
do you know him?? is Pride-C-CEX a good guy!

Do YOU know him ? After all they're just making money from fees.. This could have happened on every exchange but that "verified by.." thing is a problem from c-cex.. This was like the third or fourth scam ..
yes , let us pm that guy , asking for our refund.

Makes no sense to me, he won't refund, I did not trust C-Cex since day 1 and I do not trade on them.
legendary
Activity: 2884
Merit: 1137
Leading Crypto Sports Betting & Casino Platform
August 29, 2014, 02:06:54 AM
#46
Not invested much but i feel like a greedy idiot. That's because i was a greedy idiot. Hopefully i learned... so what's the next ipo?
full member
Activity: 128
Merit: 100
August 29, 2014, 02:05:50 AM
#45
Please tell me what's special about NWO that make people invested in it ?
c-cex verified the dev of nwo .so  c-cex  should refund the scam money.
legendary
Activity: 938
Merit: 1000
August 29, 2014, 02:01:16 AM
#44
Please tell me what's special about NWO that make people invested in it ?
full member
Activity: 128
Merit: 100
August 29, 2014, 02:00:19 AM
#43
I have sent a PM to Pride-C-CEX  who had verified the nwo dev,,,, all we need to do is asking him to refund ......take responsibility

Im sure he will try to get a refund from the dev and when the dev refuses maybe will reveal the scammers ID. I think there may be laws against that though, breach of privacy laws ? Who knows I'd be shocked if the dev returned the funds though so don't hold your breath.
do you know him?? is Pride-C-CEX a good guy!

Do YOU know him ? After all they're just making money from fees.. This could have happened on every exchange but that "verified by.." thing is a problem from c-cex.. This was like the third or fourth scam ..
yes , let us pm that guy , asking for our refund.
legendary
Activity: 2660
Merit: 1240
August 29, 2014, 01:48:12 AM
#42
I have sent a PM to Pride-C-CEX  who had verified the nwo dev,,,, all we need to do is asking him to refund ......take responsibility

Im sure he will try to get a refund from the dev and when the dev refuses maybe will reveal the scammers ID. I think there may be laws against that though, breach of privacy laws ? Who knows I'd be shocked if the dev returned the funds though so don't hold your breath.
do you know him?? is Pride-C-CEX a good guy!

Do YOU know him ? After all they're just making money from fees.. This could have happened on every exchange but that "verified by.." thing is a problem from c-cex.. This was like the third or fourth scam ..
full member
Activity: 128
Merit: 100
August 29, 2014, 01:40:35 AM
#41
I have sent a PM to Pride-C-CEX  who had verified the nwo dev,,,, all we need to do is asking him to refund ......take responsibility

Im sure he will try to get a refund from the dev and when the dev refuses maybe will reveal the scammers ID. I think there may be laws against that though, breach of privacy laws ? Who knows I'd be shocked if the dev returned the funds though so don't hold your breath.
do you know him?? is Pride-C-CEX a good guy!
full member
Activity: 128
Merit: 100
August 29, 2014, 01:39:29 AM
#40
I have sent a PM to Pride-C-CEX  who had verified the nwo dev,,,, all we need to do is asking him to refund ......take responsibility

Im sure he will try to get a refund from the dev and when the dev refuses maybe will reveal the scammers ID. I think there may be laws against that though, breach of privacy laws ? Who knows I'd be shocked if the dev returned the funds though so don't hold your breath.
I have sent a pm to Pride-C-CEX too , is he the c-cex owner?
full member
Activity: 137
Merit: 100
August 29, 2014, 01:20:10 AM
#39
is there an ICO that works?

C-CEX, it is your responsibility to track down to the scammer and get full refund to investors!

Don't buy any ICO/IPO. More or less all are scams.

"Verified by C-cex" - C-Cex return all the investors BTC beacuse they bought a coin upon your approval.
Has the C-cex sent the ICO fund to the scammer dev?If so,I don't think refund will happen.
hero member
Activity: 560
Merit: 500
August 29, 2014, 01:14:36 AM
#38
I have sent a PM to Pride-C-CEX  who had verified the nwo dev,,,, all we need to do is asking him to refund ......take responsibility

Im sure he will try to get a refund from the dev and when the dev refuses maybe will reveal the scammers ID. I think there may be laws against that though, breach of privacy laws ? Who knows I'd be shocked if the dev returned the funds though so don't hold your breath.
member
Activity: 111
Merit: 10
August 29, 2014, 01:09:41 AM
#37
I have sent a PM to Pride-C-CEX  who had verified the nwo dev,,,, all we need to do is asking him to refund ......take responsibility
member
Activity: 112
Merit: 10
August 29, 2014, 01:00:51 AM
#36
Just out of curiosity did anyone stop to think that an exchange cannot force a dev to stick around? Can you predict the future?  Or is this concept too hard to grasp?  All I see here is a bunch of people crying over an exchange when it was the dev who ran off... .how the hell do you expect refunds when dev has the money and this is crypto if you want refunds go back to fiat and the trust system you obviously have no place here.

Crypto doesn't mean a safe sanctuary for scammers.Since crypto is not regulated by any organisation or govt its members, community,pools and  exchanges should come forward and devise some guidelines to safeguard the interests of miners and investors.

In this case an exchange, a big organised organisation is/was in better position to have some guidelines to safe guard the interest of it's traders.And failing to do so they should take the responsibility of the scam.

So you are basically saying an exchange should cover the losses of developers that run off? You do realize how stupid that is right? How would any exchange force anyone to continue development of any coin, if you know of a way to force people to do things then you have figured out something amazing and unheard of. The dev showed their ID, promised the exchange to deliver the wallets and networks, then took off with the funds while the coding dev dumped his 200k they were supposedly using for a anon mixer. I'd like to know how anyone could predict this scenario with 100% certainty and then guarantee that for investors in decentralized monetary system......

An exchange as compare to  members or pools are professional organisation and they must have some guidelines to protect the intrest of it's traders -

-Why they have released all the funds immediately to a dev verified by them despite of recent scams?

-Why they didn't warn the investors of the risks associated with it?

Investors bought it not on the reputation of the newbie dev,but they bought when they saw "verified by an exchange". So it's responsibility belongs to the exchange not that anon ,newbie dev.

I agree, since exchange verified him, they should request BTCs back. If he refuses, then they can publish this scammer's real name and other info, so he can no longer continue cheating other people.
yes, support your idea,  c-cex should take responsibility , or there will be no any other trust to their ICO
full member
Activity: 168
Merit: 100
August 29, 2014, 12:58:34 AM
#35
Guys, but honestly, why invest in an ICO for something called NWO?. It's pointless and stupid, you all got scammed for being too greedy. I've invested in ICOs and had good return, sometimes I've also lost some funds, but I always try to look for something that has a future.

For instance, I invested heavily into VIA and it's made me lots of BTC, hope this is a lesson for all of you but don't scream that all ICO's are scam, just investigate into what and who're you're investing your BTC into. And please, if a "dev" is coming out with a stupid name like kraken, cold, nwo, crystal and all that stuff, just think for a second and ask yourselves if the coin will have a future or not, something called NWO has no chance whatsoever of making it in real life.


Just my 2c
sr. member
Activity: 616
Merit: 251
August 29, 2014, 12:57:02 AM
#34
Just out of curiosity did anyone stop to think that an exchange cannot force a dev to stick around? Can you predict the future?  Or is this concept too hard to grasp?  All I see here is a bunch of people crying over an exchange when it was the dev who ran off... .how the hell do you expect refunds when dev has the money and this is crypto if you want refunds go back to fiat and the trust system you obviously have no place here.

Crypto doesn't mean a safe sanctuary for scammers.Since crypto is not regulated by any organisation or govt its members, community,pools and  exchanges should come forward and devise some guidelines to safeguard the interests of miners and investors.

In this case an exchange, a big organised organisation is/was in better position to have some guidelines to safe guard the interest of it's traders.And failing to do so they should take the responsibility of the scam.

So you are basically saying an exchange should cover the losses of developers that run off? You do realize how stupid that is right? How would any exchange force anyone to continue development of any coin, if you know of a way to force people to do things then you have figured out something amazing and unheard of. The dev showed their ID, promised the exchange to deliver the wallets and networks, then took off with the funds while the coding dev dumped his 200k they were supposedly using for a anon mixer. I'd like to know how anyone could predict this scenario with 100% certainty and then guarantee that for investors in decentralized monetary system......

An exchange as compare to  members or pools are professional organisation and they must have some guidelines to protect the intrest of it's traders -

-Why they have released all the funds immediately to a dev verified by them despite of recent scams?

-Why they didn't warn the investors of the risks associated with it?

Investors bought it not on the reputation of the newbie dev,but they bought when they saw "verified by an exchange". So it's responsibility belongs to the exchange not that anon ,newbie dev.

I agree, since exchange verified him, they should request BTCs back. If he refuses, then they can publish this scammer's real name and other info, so he can no longer continue cheating other people.
full member
Activity: 126
Merit: 100
August 29, 2014, 12:47:14 AM
#33
Just out of curiosity did anyone stop to think that an exchange cannot force a dev to stick around? Can you predict the future?  Or is this concept too hard to grasp?  All I see here is a bunch of people crying over an exchange when it was the dev who ran off... .how the hell do you expect refunds when dev has the money and this is crypto if you want refunds go back to fiat and the trust system you obviously have no place here.

Crypto doesn't mean a safe sanctuary for scammers.Since crypto is not regulated by any organisation or govt its members, community,pools and  exchanges should come forward and devise some guidelines to safeguard the interests of miners and investors.

In this case an exchange, a big organised organisation is/was in better position to have some guidelines to safe guard the interest of it's traders.And failing to do so they should take the responsibility of the scam.

So you are basically saying an exchange should cover the losses of developers that run off? You do realize how stupid that is right? How would any exchange force anyone to continue development of any coin, if you know of a way to force people to do things then you have figured out something amazing and unheard of. The dev showed their ID, promised the exchange to deliver the wallets and networks, then took off with the funds while the coding dev dumped his 200k they were supposedly using for a anon mixer. I'd like to know how anyone could predict this scenario with 100% certainty and then guarantee that for investors in decentralized monetary system......

An exchange as compare to  members or pools are professional organisation and they must have some guidelines to protect the intrest of it's traders -

-Why they have released all the funds immediately to a dev verified by them despite of recent scams?

-Why they didn't warn the investors of the risks associated with it?

Investors bought it not on the reputation of the newbie dev,but they bought when they saw "verified by an exchange". So it's responsibility belongs to the exchange not that anon ,newbie dev.
hero member
Activity: 560
Merit: 500
August 29, 2014, 12:36:15 AM
#32
Just out of curiosity did anyone stop to think that an exchange cannot force a dev to stick around? Can you predict the future?  Or is this concept too hard to grasp?  All I see here is a bunch of people crying over an exchange when it was the dev who ran off... .how the hell do you expect refunds when dev has the money and this is crypto if you want refunds go back to fiat and the trust system you obviously have no place here.

Crypto doesn't mean a safe sanctuary for scammers.Since crypto is not regulated by any organisation or govt its members, community,pools and  exchanges should come forward and devise some guidelines to safeguard the interests of miners and investors.

In this case an exchange, a big organised organisation is/was in better position to have some guidelines to safe guard the interest of it's traders.And failing to do so they should take the responsibility of the scam.

Absolutely. Why the exchanges have "verification" process? this is to prevent scams. Now C-cex should do something. The ICO is not a bad idea, if all parties are honest, it is a good way to distribute the coins. The scammers should be punished.

LMAO so should we ask C-CEX to go kick this guys ass till he gives back the BTC? You know legally there's not a damn thing they can do so really stfu you have no idea what you are talking about.


Just out of curiosity did anyone stop to think that an exchange cannot force a dev to stick around? Can you predict the future?  Or is this concept too hard to grasp?  All I see here is a bunch of people crying over an exchange when it was the dev who ran off... .how the hell do you expect refunds when dev has the money and this is crypto if you want refunds go back to fiat and the trust system you obviously have no place here.

Crypto doesn't mean a safe sanctuary for scammers.Since crypto is not regulated by any organisation or govt its members, community,pools and  exchanges should come forward and devise some guidelines to safeguard the interests of miners and investors.

In this case an exchange, a big organised organisation is/was in better position to have some guidelines to safe guard the interest of it's traders.And failing to do so they should take the responsibility of the scam.

So you are basically saying an exchange should cover the losses of developers that run off? You do realize how stupid that is right? How would any exchange force anyone to continue development of any coin, if you know of a way to force people to do things then you have figured out something amazing and unheard of. The dev showed their ID, promised the exchange to deliver the wallets and networks, then took off with the funds while the coding dev dumped his 200k they were supposedly using for a anon mixer. I'd like to know how anyone could predict this scenario with 100% certainty and then guarantee that for investors in decentralized monetary system......
Pages:
Jump to: