Topic: | Nxt | Blockchain Platform | Proof of Stake | Official - page 197. (Read 941285 times)

It does already exist!

Its called the NXT Monetary System (ME)!

I remember reading something about how an independent coin could be brought onto the NXT network, I don't remember if this was in the plans, in the works, or something that already exists, I have a coin that would be interested in that.  what is the status on that please?

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Release 1.5.12

https://bitbucket.org/JeanLucPicard/nxt/downloads/nxt-client-1.5.12.zip

sha256:

ac42f30dde2f84c624a78791befb44ed0f11dc8e456742388d410537914266f9  nxt-client-1.5.12.zip

https://bitbucket.org/JeanLucPicard/nxt/downloads/nxt-client-1.5.12.jar

sha256:

f29d6229f9a14ee37b217ffcf6484b7efcd16ac5ce714b64e968de7ceafd311e  nxt-client-1.5.12.jar

https://bitbucket.org/JeanLucPicard/nxt/downloads/nxt-client-1.5.12.exe



Change log:

Significantly reduced the number of threads used when WebSockets are enabled.
This should prevent the out of memory issues on some systems caused by
excessive number of native threads created.

Fixed important bugs in fork resolution during blockchain download.

Improved blockchain download speeds, reduce load on hallmarked nodes and avoid
slow peers during download.

Send event notifications when using the eventRegister and eventWait APIs only
after the database transaction has been committed, to make sure the changes
that triggered the event are visible at the time the event is emitted.

Added generateFileToken and decodeFileToken APIs, allowing creating and
verifying tokens for files.

Fixed file upload when using the test page.

The maximum file size accepted for upload can be restricted using the new
nxt.maxUploadFileSize property, default and minimum accepted value is 42 kB.


Client UI:

Fixed missing scrollbars in modals invoked from other modals.

Updated some translations. Added Romanian translation (experimental).

Updated bootstrap to version 3.3.4.


-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1
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=6jAr
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

Common sense doesn't exist.

No one should be running a system that is susceptible to a published security vulnerability if they can help it.  That's common sense.

I'm disappointed that security isn't a higher priority here.  Just because nothing is 100% secure doesn't mean it's OK to require users to install software with published security vulnerabilities.

Like it or not, everyone is using vulnerable software. Everyone.
Have you ever seen an invulnerable software ? I would like to know.

# glsa-check -t all
This system is not affected by any of the listed GLSAs
#

Even if those 13 security vulnerabilities only pertain to running untrusted code as you say (you've obviously investigated each one: nice), what if an ARM+NRS user makes that vulnerable JDK their system JDK and runs a browser?  

Once again:

These security bugs are talking about running malicious untrusted code on JVM that can breach JVM's builtin security.

It sounds like you have already carefully gone over each of the 13 vulnerabilities

It sounds like you have already carefully gone over each of the 13 vulnerabilities then, right?  Especially the 3 with a 10/10 severity of course.

http://www.cvedetails.com/vulnerability-list/vendor_id-93/product_id-19116/Oracle-JDK.html

none of these 'vulnerabilities" have any relevance in your usecase.

Btw cryptsy has issues with NXT withdrawals very often based on my experience... it's definitely not the best option if you need to withdraw NXT fast

may be the storm
this is my Internet operator who has problem
thank you for yur link