Maybe there is a good solution out there...
Users should use their own brain, it's the solution.
Topic: [NXT] Decentralized Asset Exchange Discussion Thread - page 9. (Read 31346 times)
Users should use their own brain, it's the solution.
CfB, CIYAM. Don't crush your heads together. CIYAM thinks his solution is better and CfB thinks the solution is worse.
Let's vote
Just kidding. Maybe there is a good solution out there...
Let's vote
Just kidding. Maybe there is a good solution out there...
Reputation will not work.
Wasn't there gona be a reputation system? Won't this help?
p.s. Don't bother to answer me if my question is irrelevant. Your time is very valuable for me!
p.s. Don't bother to answer me if my question is irrelevant. Your time is very valuable for me!
I *gave* you a better solution.
Allow multiple Assets with the same name.
This will cause average Joe to go "what the fuck" and stop him losing his NXT.
Why do you need to ignore my solution (your bosses are "telling you to ignore it")?
Allow multiple Assets with the same name.
This will cause average Joe to go "what the fuck" and stop him losing his NXT.
Why do you need to ignore my solution (your bosses are "telling you to ignore it")?
I think ur solution is worse. People will see legit "CIYAM" and fake "CIYAM", they won't read numbers, coz numbers r much harder to "read".
While we have no a better solution it's better to change nothing, imo.
I *gave* you a better solution.
Allow multiple Assets with the same name.
This will cause average Joe to go "what the fuck" and stop him losing his NXT.
Why do you need to ignore my solution (your bosses are "telling you to ignore it")?
Ian worries about someone squatting "CIYAM", well, it's a world of cryptoanarchy and laws don't work here, live with it.
No *I do not* (don't put words into my mouth please).
I worry someone uses "my name" to rip people off (and this *will* happen - and you know it but don't care).
Sorry, I meant that someone would squat CIYAM to rip ppl off.
While we have no a better solution it's better to change nothing, imo.
Let's see if some good ideas are out there (main thread).
Ian worries about someone squatting "CIYAM", well, it's a world of cryptoanarchy and laws don't work here, live with it.
No *I do not* (don't put words into my mouth please).
I worry someone uses "my name" to rip people off (and this *will* happen - and you know it but don't care).
It could be a deal breaker. We can at least talk about how to make it better for the user.
We need name anyway. If we don't show the name but the id instead then people will call assets using first 3-5 digits. And someone will create an asset with the same first digits.
Asset registration fee is set to 1000 NXT to counteract squatting.
Ian worries about someone squatting "CIYAM", well, it's a world of cryptoanarchy and laws don't work here, live with it.
It could be a deal breaker. We can at least talk about how to make it better for the user.
So you *want* to see the Asset Exchange launch crash NXT and cause us all to be labelled as scammers?
U make a mountain out of a molehill.
Don't be so touchy, CfB.
I have - can't offer a better solution, leave it as is.
So you *want* to see the Asset Exchange launch crash NXT and cause us all to be labelled as scammers?
(I guess so)
edit: Maybe some other guys have a great idea? Could post it in the main thread.
I have - can't offer a better solution, leave it as is.
You are probably right. And I always prefer simple over complex.
edit: Maybe some other guys have a great idea? Could post it in the main thread.
edit: Maybe some other guys have a great idea? Could post it in the main thread.
What about using reputation system and showing a scoring value next to the Asset?
Easily cheated as well - just don't have unique Asset Names - rather simple actually.
If you only see 1 Asset Name then far more likely it is "genuine" - if you see >1 then you *know* you need to investigate more.
What about using reputation system and showing a scoring value (of the asset and the issuer) next to the Asset?
Yeah, I think now "no names" is too radical and ignores user friendliness.
True although that is why I had suggested using account owned aliases for this which would allow *renames* as a side feature.
Yeah, now I think "no names" is too radical and ignores user friendliness.
Jump to: