Author

Topic: NXT :: descendant of Bitcoin - Updated Information - page 1063. (Read 2761642 times)

full member
Activity: 238
Merit: 100
Some want it the way it is:

In numbers: 1.0 Count me in on that.

There are several others.

Got you for 1.0.  Will repost after more to tally.

Can you point me to the other 1.0s?  Is a little difficult to tally when not clearly specified.

(and, I really don't *want* to be responsible for tallying these votes...  consolidating for review)

make a google docs spreadsheet, with 4 columns: 1, .1, .01, .001
then put each username in the respective column.  we all need to decided if/how community will allow 2 votes per person for different categories or let them put their 2 votes in 1 category
lock it down so only you can update it, but that anyone with direct link can view it
receive community's thanks for doing this work
sr. member
Activity: 364
Merit: 250
☕ NXT-4BTE-8Y4K-CDS2-6TB82
Some want it the way it is:

In numbers: 1.0 Count me in on that.

There are several others.

Got you for 1.0.  Will repost after more to tally.

Can you point me to the other 1.0s?  Is a little difficult to tally when not clearly specified.

Hmm, I see. Most say just: 'why?' or the like Cheesy .... let me see. I send you PM.
full member
Activity: 266
Merit: 100
NXT is the future
Calming down already.

I'm not the dev. They are.

This seems to be the common misconception. CfB is constantly hinting people that devs won't do all the work.

Of course, if you are not a dev, you are not a dev, but nothing keeps you from being a part of the NXT community and do what you can do to make NXT a success. Just nagging doesn't help.


He sponsors a lot of projects Marcus03.
full member
Activity: 171
Merit: 100
hi all,

will the fee been adjusted for all kind of transactions?
It would be possible to reduce the fee eg. for AM and AE for testing only.
Would a selected reduction be an option?

cheers!
sr. member
Activity: 364
Merit: 250
☕ NXT-4BTE-8Y4K-CDS2-6TB82
0.25   Passion_ltc
0.01   landomata
0.1   CIYAM Open
0.1   longzai1988
0.1   LiQio
0.1   pinarello
0.01   minusbalancer
0.1   TwinWinNerD
0.1   bitcoinpaul
0.1   BitcoinForumator
0.1   grex
0.01   smaragda
0.01   mthcl
0.05   Jack Needles
0.1   gimre
0.001   Intel
0.01   Hegemon
0.1   lyynx
0.1   voldemort628
0.01   Ezravdb
0.1   Noltev
0.01   fmiboy
0.1   bidjl29
0.1   abuelau
0.1   seek4dream
0.1   wesleyh
0.1   achimsmile
0.1   Sebastien256
0.01   rriky92
0.1   MyZhre
0.1   msin
0.1   Ludom
0.1   xadidos
1.0   EmoneyRu
0.1   w4llace
0.1   Mistafreeze
0.1   CryptKeeper
0.01   DrearyUrbanite
0.1   MarvellousMutant
0.1   NxtChoice
0.1   abctc
0.1   eXtatiC
0.1   sherpico77
0.1 or 0.01   opticalcarrier
0.01   ImmortAlex
0.1   EvilDave
0.1   Damelon
0.1 or 0.01   pandaisftw

Updated tally.  Tried to be thorough, but standard disclaimers apply...

Some want it the way it is:

In numbers: 1.0 Count me in on that.

There are several others.
sr. member
Activity: 364
Merit: 250
☕ NXT-4BTE-8Y4K-CDS2-6TB82
I vote for 0.1. How hard is it to implement min fee change? If it is very difficult (either program-wise or logistically) then maybe 0.01 is a better idea for now.

Why would you prefer a lower fee?
sr. member
Activity: 449
Merit: 250



Quote
Might I suggest that you do not hold your breath as you wait for the apology?

I obviously can’t stay in a community where four words and a stupid smiley makes somebody wish you death and don’t even think about apologizing (don’t bother doing it now in case your consciousness suddenly wakes up, it’s too late).

And I am tired of being one guy on the other side of everybody else. A cohesive community is much more important than stupid arguments.
...
Huh? Somebody gave you a death threat? That's crazy.
...

he is referring to my previous PUBLIC comment to him in this thread that if he cant figure out how play nice here with everyone (what everyone else was asking of him) that he should go play in traffic as far as I was concerned.  Notice he never used the phrase "death threat", but that is exactly what he wanted you all to think and you fell for more of his drama.

Not sure what forum rules are regarding posting PM (it's a dick move at the least, unless illegal content) but he failed to include the rest of my PM since if he did it would not support his drama.  Since I was the sender of the PM then I can justify posting it here:
Quote
But I am optimistic that instead of being a complete jackass to everyone who you think is going off in the wrong direction, that you can instead provide better guidance instead of reverting to a complete jackass. I do see 1 recent instance of that, perhaps you can keep it up?

i guess he couldnt
full member
Activity: 224
Merit: 100
I vote for 0.1. How hard is it to implement min fee change? If it is very difficult (either program-wise or logistically) then maybe 0.01 is a better idea for now.
full member
Activity: 210
Merit: 100
If there was a guide for how to run a static-IP / VPS node, I might be willing to do it.

It's the same as running a local node. Just set ur IP in web.xml.

I've been looking all over for this little piece of information...  It is not available on the wiki, or the OP, etc.


There is something on the wiki

http://www.thenxtwiki.org/wiki/How-To:CreatePublicNode

I havent checked to see how you nav to it from the wiki frontpage though, so you may have given us a littly job to do.

It's linked off the menu on the left-hand side, through "How To Guides". You can also use the search bar; in this case, "VPS" is a particularly useful search term.
full member
Activity: 224
Merit: 100
Calming down already.

I'm not the dev. They are.

This seems to be the common misconception. CfB is constantly hinting people that devs won't do all the work.

Of course, if you are not a dev, you are not a dev, but nothing keeps you from being a part of the NXT community and do what you can do to make NXT a success. Just nagging doesn't help.
sr. member
Activity: 364
Merit: 250
☕ NXT-4BTE-8Y4K-CDS2-6TB82

I understood buybitcoinscanada and others were questioning not only the discreet announcement, but why the details were not disclosed as well. Hence my comment.


Because it's dangerous to disclose these details at once. We call this zero-day exploit.
sr. member
Activity: 364
Merit: 250
☕ NXT-4BTE-8Y4K-CDS2-6TB82
Well, I see potential for a lot of nodes dropping out (i.e. controlling the correct execution of the scripts) because they cannot afford executing them.

Let's get solid numbers of opcode/sec rate first.

Agreed.

---------------

Just to have said it and not to forget it later: another note on that: we could limit the number of ops per block as we limit the number of transactions per block.
sr. member
Activity: 460
Merit: 250
Shouldnt this announcement be in big bold red letters all over the place? How do you expect everyone to upgrade due to a critical bug if you don't make it seem serious and disclose the matter nonchalantly.

The fact Jean-Luc urges everyone to update for a critical issue is enough to do it. Reasons might not be disclosed to avoid malicious exploits in a 0.5.11 vulnerability.

Sorry, but it is not.

If not updating has such large consequences, it needs to be coordinated at least with nxtcrypto so QBTC can put it in the front page.

People who don´t read this thread have no idea they need to update and basically no way of knowing it.

I understood buybitcoinscanada and others were questioning not only the discreet announcement, but why the details were not disclosed as well. Hence my comment.

I didn't intend to suggest that spreading the word was unnecessary, apologies if it appeared that way... I did update my spanish resources and nextcoin.org's three hours ago.
legendary
Activity: 2142
Merit: 1010
Newbie
Well, I see potential for a lot of nodes dropping out (i.e. controlling the correct execution of the scripts) because they cannot afford executing them.

Let's get solid numbers of opcode/sec rate first.
sr. member
Activity: 364
Merit: 250
☕ NXT-4BTE-8Y4K-CDS2-6TB82
Okay.

Maybe, you can elaborate more on this.

It's already implemented,

Good point.

Quote
no need to make things more complicated.

Well, I see potential for a lot of nodes dropping out (i.e. controlling the correct execution of the scripts) because they cannot afford executing them.
full member
Activity: 238
Merit: 100
If there was a guide for how to run a static-IP / VPS node, I might be willing to do it.

It's the same as running a local node. Just set ur IP in web.xml.

I've been looking all over for this little piece of information...  It is not available on the wiki, or the OP, etc.


There is something on the wiki

http://www.thenxtwiki.org/wiki/How-To:CreatePublicNode

I havent checked to see how you nav to it from the wiki frontpage though, so you may have given us a littly job to do.
newbie
Activity: 41
Merit: 0
If there was a guide for how to run a static-IP / VPS node, I might be willing to do it.

It's the same as running a local node. Just set ur IP in web.xml.

I've been looking all over for this little piece of information...  It is not available on the wiki, or the OP, etc.
sr. member
Activity: 364
Merit: 250
☕ NXT-4BTE-8Y4K-CDS2-6TB82
I am about to go ballistic... Why havn't you updated that post? Are you here to critize only? Just get your a** up and act yourself instead of jumping onto others... Geez.

Woooh, relax.
legendary
Activity: 2142
Merit: 1010
Newbie
Okay.

Maybe, you can elaborate more on this.

It's already implemented, no need to make things more complicated.
sr. member
Activity: 364
Merit: 250
☕ NXT-4BTE-8Y4K-CDS2-6TB82
That takes us to 2). What are your suggestions and what do you think of the even split between the 1440 forgers of that day.

I like the idea when 1 forger gets all the fees of that script.

Okay.

Maybe, you can elaborate more on this.
Jump to: