Topic: NXT :: descendant of Bitcoin - Updated Information - page 1157. (Read 2761626 times)

So I guess Uniqueorn put me on ignore... Guess he doesn't want another person helping with Swarming just because I don't agree with him on GW. An issue that has very little to do with Nxt. He insulted me numerous times, and I didn't even insult him once.

I'd sure trust this guy to be in management like positions in my company *sarcasm*

I think you should scratch your carbon offsets in favor of something less controversial. A proposal for subsidies to provide free abortions to the less fortunate? It will probably be less divisive. 

Imagine the marketing opportunity if we had abortion clinics that accepted Nxt as payment. 

You guys know it's $300+ to get in the door, right?

Half people say that we need to bury mentions of GW because it turns people off. The other half want to shout from the rooftops that we are carbon free because it's a marketing gimmick.
NXT is already using low power consumption as a selling point, carbon-offset just takes this USP further. We can be greenish without getting into GW

Evil Dave you sound like every other do gooder central planner I've had to listen to throughout my life...that if we just give them free money they will remake the world in their image. You also claim a moral superiority because you want to plant trees and make a big show of helping poor people.
What moral superiority? Come on, mate. Never made any such claim, won't make any such claim.
It's not a show, clean stoves will help the 2-3 billion poor sods who cook on crap-burning stoves. Costs very little, too

What intrinsically makes planting a tree so valuable? If you have to cut down a forest to make room for low-cost housing for the poor, that you purport to care about, then who wins? What's more important? The poor people or the trees?
Not cutting down forest for housing, not part of my idea.
On poor people or trees: both could win, btw, some people, mostly women, get to spend several hours a day gathering firewood/dung/whatever to burn. Efficient stoves mean they need less fuel gathering time, for a start. More trees, easier to find fuel.

As far as carbon offsets...there's a reason hydroponics shops sell tanks of compressed carbon dioxide...it's because carbon dioxide is plant food. It helps trees grow.
Thats why i'm not banging on about CO2 levels, but about the other positive aspects of a good carbon-offset program

Suppose we cut carbon emissions, and this lead to lower agricultural outputs and an increase in starvation and famine? How would you feel if poor people starved because of your carbon offsets?
We have enough atmospheric CO2, and again, it's not all about the CO2.

You are trying to push your muddled, politically correct, views onto Nxt because you see a pile of free money sitting there for the taking.
I'm pushing a powerful marketing opportunity. The free money ain't going in my pocket, but if NXT can go mainstream and at least take LiteCoins position, I will make some serious cash.

Keep politics out of Nxt. It will only divide people. Nxt does a far better job than other cryptos and costs less in resources to do it. This is a powerful message. We don't need your carbon dioxide boogie men and the attendant politics to make that point.
This is not a political issue.......I think.

And yes, I did read your proposal. Aside from you being mealy-mouthed about global warming specifically, you conclude the same thing as all other environmentalist control freaks...that we should feel guilty about using energy and we have to make some sort of amends for the crime of being born human.
Guilty, crime....sorry, but u've lost me. Show me a quote.

Block

BUMP

I think you should scratch your carbon offsets in favor of something less controversial. A proposal for subsidies to provide free abortions to the less fortunate? It will probably be less divisive. 

Imagine the marketing opportunity if we had abortion clinics that accepted Nxt as payment. 

I think you should scratch your carbon offsets in favor of something less controversial. A proposal for subsidies to provide free abortions to the less fortunate? It will probably be less divisive. 

Imagine the marketing opportunity if we had abortion clinics that accepted Nxt as payment. 

Don't start on GW or we will just get completely de-railed

Pollution, air quality, forests, oxygen, poor people and marketing. Thats what I want to concentrate on....

That went well.....not!  
I'm now going to re-post the carbon-offset proposal with all of the GW-related material censored, which was only about 10% of my original post.

Or at least until the next time.

We'll need to discuss voting system, too high fees with no decimals and unclaimed coins first. Then back to GW 

Now let's not talk more about science.

Hi there,
I'm thinking about long term investent in NXT and have kind a technical question. Will the transaction fee always be 1NXT? Are we gonna have decimals? Asking because I'm afraid that if NXT price would be about for example 5$ and somebody wants to make a payment of 10$, the fee would be way to high.