Topic: NXT :: descendant of Bitcoin - Updated Information - page 1308. (Read 2761642 times)

I assume what he means by "still not revealed" is that they know what to do, but they aren't going to tell everyone about it, as this is NXT's true key to establishing dominance over NXT clones. Clones can clone NXT all they want, but unless they know how Transparent Forging works, they will have nothing on NXT.

But give me a moment, I will think of something to replace that line, just in case.

srry, I don't get it ...
The 3rd one was not about NRS, just about a mechanism, which allows some experts having more votes than common people.
E.g. in real life some company decides to buy new IT services. IT experts have 10 votes, clerks 3, others 1.
I just meant that I don't know how that would be implemented in NXTsystem, coz we don't know the skills, which are behind the accounts.

Over 1 year
Did you not see the value in having people at the trade show? That costs money.

How would any technical bounties speed up deployment of Transparent Forging? That is the key to everything and it is already being worked on by the best man possible.

What technical piece is missing for NXT to be superior to emunie/etherium?

From what I can tell, when nexern is done with client his DNA will be the etherium killer and I will bet that he will get it done before etherium's crowd process gets it done.

So, with Asset Exchange we are pretty much at feature parity with emunie. What is missing? I have not tried the emunie beta, so I have no idea what features they have that NXT doesn't. If it is a super important feature that NXT doesn't have, then certainly, let's get a bounty for it ASAP.

If we have enough tech and not enough marketing, why not balance it out and get the marketing? If emunie and etherium were not doing their IPOs as we speak, I would not feel this sense of urgency. There is only a finite amount of people who will invest in cryptos and they WILL be choosing between emunie, etherium and NXT as these are the second gen cryptos. Some will hedge and split between the three, some will go heavier into one other than the other, etc.

Shouldn't we get as much of the second gen investor funds as we deserve? What percentage does NXT deserve? Are we going to get that percentage? If not, then we need more marketing.

James

That is quite impressive I must say NXT coin is one of the only alt coins which does have potential to become something great.

I would be absolutely appalled if we spend 10Mil Nxt on marketing, that is utterly ridiculous.  

ok so i would leave it out of any advertisement since the post its self says

Excuse me? Next version of NRS, for example, u'll be setuping from link given to u not by some acc, but by Jean-Luc with his syle and PGP keys (and, may be installing software only in second+ row of installators to check by calmness that everything is alright), won't u? U can't get rid of relying and trusting completely (some last steps of Land of Mistrust is to write your own Java-compilator, cos any other could be compromised). As simpe as that for any kind of decision. If u're dev, u'll be collecting opinions and points of wished features, discussing pros and contras and then writing code.

U're taking decisions, u're evaluating the disposition. No one have to vote to pick correct version of NRS for u.

In decentralized system there're still creators and consumers. Developers and users. But chains of trust not end at single center of power, in who u need to have unlimited trust. Decentralized system's more stable.

The 1 minute speech should be tested to some people, which are not familiar to NXT.
Then would be also found, if the "next" (NXT), or even "nexts" (NXT's), causes extra wondering in the heard speech

Pardon me if I'm wrong (as I don't completely understand the technical aspects), but I think this has to do with transparent forging and a temporary penalty levied against nodes that go offline (in the case that someone were to acquire a 51% stake and try to fork the network).

If we are going to be behind other projects on features, shouldn't we be funding bounty projects for advanced features?  I don't see how marketing solves that issue.  

I don't know, maybe something like:

50 BTC dolphin
100 BTC small whale
250 BTC medium whale
1000 BTC big blue whale

https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/transparent-mining-or-what-makes-nxt-a-2nd-generation-currency-364218

Ready for what's NXT? Written from the ground up, NXT is the first true second generation crypto. NXT's unique 100% Proof of Stake security model and truly de-centralized architecture provide a platform for breakthrough and disruptive innovations. Transparent forging, arbitrary messaging, and de-centralized asset exchange are just a few of the innovative features that will help write the next big crypto story of 2014. With Transparent Forging, a proprietary technology unique to NXT, the network is capable of achieving instantly-secure transactions at Visa-level transaction volumes. Additionally, NXT's 100% Proof of Stake model completely eliminates the threat of a 51% percent attack, and does away with the enormous electrical and inflationary costs of blockchain security. With all of its exciting, promised features, NXT provides the best and most secure foundation for users and businesses alike. NXT, the Next Generation of Cryptocurrency.

Funding authorization is ALL that is required for a signal to the whales that NXT is serious business and to save the 10 million NXT from being vaporized

Marketing benefits the entire NXT community, globally. It is perfect way to spend community funds. Without marketing much harder to convince more whales to invest big. Also, whales like to make money, so if we announce funding before it is spent, it gives them time to accumulate the NXT before the big run up in price created by the big marketing campaign.

With the client days away from being released, the time is now. With emunie IPO starting next week, the time in now. With etherium IPO starting, the time is now.

This is a race and NXT is going to win, so lets let the whole world know this. all it takes is to fund marketing.

James

+1

okay))

you have to define whale

If we find a method to vote reliably, we can then implement a 2-tier system on top of it, where you delegate your votes for a particular matter to an expert.

You can say that "for this particular technical issue I delegate my vote to Jean-Luc".

But we need to find a reliable voting mechanism first.