Quote
1) News Aggregation
2) AdWords
3) Domain Names
4) Patents, Copyright and next generation Intellectual Property
5) Insurance
6) Courts, Escrow, and Arbitration
7) Authenticated Anonymous Voting
Prediction Markets
9) Next Generation Search Engines
2) AdWords
3) Domain Names
4) Patents, Copyright and next generation Intellectual Property
5) Insurance
6) Courts, Escrow, and Arbitration
7) Authenticated Anonymous Voting
Prediction Markets9) Next Generation Search Engines
this + DNA + distributed computation protocoll + 3 month -> nxt gateway to the global finance market -> strike
(building DNAs in c/c++ is dangerous, you can't sandboxing this. at least with a granularity necessary.
interpreted, prototype and self reflectional languages are much better for this, they are also widely used
within academic ai research and there are several good reason for this.)
ps: perhaps DNAs could find some pattern in strange stuff like this -> http://87.230.14.1/download/0003.png or this http://87.230.14.1/download/0002.png
at least it would be fun to shift possibilities some percentages into the right direction.
By "strike" do you mean "technological unemployment"? That's what I see. Like this - http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0SuGRgdJA_c
Those patterns look like Cellular Automate. Perhaps a DNA could generate it's own income producing academic research outputs based on the NXT system. It already covers a vast amount of fields - economics, sociology, cybernetics, artificial intelligence, chaos theory etc.
Couldn't you sandbox the c/c++ by executing it on a virtual/emulated computer spread across the network? It would certainly be a lot slower.
All this sounds nice and all that, but it seems to be purely theoretical. Are there any reference implementations of a simple DAC? I can see how a DAC's logic can be published using open source, or is the code actually just put into a blockchain?
Maybe a DAC can simply use the NXT blockchain to easily implement its own private blockchain by using AM?
There just seem to be so many gaps between the theory and a DDK (DAC development kit)
James
You are absolutely correct. It is theoretical as there are few obvious implementations of a DAC. The concept wasn't worth thinking about before the advent of decentralised trust-less systems with Bitcoin. And Bitcoin is not necessarily the ideal vehicle on which to slap a DAC. Bitcoin itself can be considered a DAC however. It is decentralised/distributed. It is autonomous and follows its largely pre-defined rule-set. And it serves its community of miners by providing them with block rewards and it rewards its other users with the utility of a decent payment system.
Indeed, the arbitrary message system could be very improtant for this.
Did you miss this comment earlier:
Quote
Edit: For a crude test you could ignore the trustless/decentralised nature of a DAC and simply execute a standalone piece of code on 2 or more NXTers computers (i.e. they are already running the NXT client/daemon) which performs some action (like interrogates their balance for example) and get it to message back to your node/instance of the app (and every other node). The messaging could be internal or external to the NXT system. So this simple/pointless app lets everyone in that community (2 or 3 NXTers or however many) know the balance of each others accounts.
