NXT :: descendant of Bitcoin - Updated Information - page 1749.

EmoneyRu

hero member

Activity: 600

Merit: 500

Nxt-kit developer

Quote from: Ebrelus on January 09, 2014, 08:50:46 AM

If there are some accounts with substancial amounts of NXT which are nobody's property and have weaker passwords than maybe we could create special thread to organise group cracking.

I'm sure a lot of people would like to use script/program to make such group brute force treasure hunting

It could be constructed in similar way as altcoins pool mining with system of distribution f.e. lucky one would get half of found NXTs and the rest of could get proportional part of other half. Also it could be a simple solo treasure hunting.

This would be great for increasing NXT community and would be simply fun. In future because of growing amounts of NXT's lost in void it would become even more successful. What do you think about it?

Let's use ASICs & GPUs for that Grin

Ebrelus

full member

Activity: 186

Merit: 100

If there are some accounts with substancial amounts of NXT which are nobody's property and have weaker passwords than maybe we could create special thread to organise group cracking.

I'm sure a lot of people would like to use script/program to make such group brute force treasure hunting

It could be constructed in similar way as altcoins pool mining with system of distribution f.e. lucky one would get half of found NXTs and the rest of could get proportional part of other half. Also it could be a simple solo treasure hunting.

This would be great for increasing NXT community and would be simply fun. In future because of growing amounts of NXT's lost in void it would become even more successful. What do you think about it?

bidji29

sr. member

Activity: 392

Merit: 250

Quote from: jl777 on January 09, 2014, 08:38:38 AM

went to -2540 blocks, 2543 orphaned blocks, 17803 unconfirmed transactions, within half an hour after redownloading block chain

36881      2584657662098653454      January 9, 2014 3:29:53 PM GMT+02:00
1      100 + 1      128 B
2      7115225331220974788      609 %

Not sure if this is relevant, but the My transactions window ends up with duplicate transactions listed some old transactions from last week are duplicated. I was having a lot of problems sending, i think due to system clock and 15 seconds issue.

December 30, 2013 5:24:37 AM GMT+02:00      2269220637361284198      2      1      -
December 30, 2013 7:25:03 AM GMT+02:00      2269220637361284198      11      1      -
December 30, 2013 7:32:50 AM GMT+02:00      2269220637361284198      10'000   10      -
December 30, 2013 7:39:10 AM GMT+02:00      2269220637361284198      90'000   90      -

Hmm... other than the duplicates in My Transactions, it seems that it is still moving forward:

36888      4747512364439223888      January 9, 2014 3:37:14 PM GMT+02:00
1      4 + 1      128 B
2      1819073736885755019      233 %

This seems to be an issue with NRS display? Just a bit worrisome about negative recent blocks, so many orphans and unconfirmed. Is this normal?

I think it's just the display who is wrong.
But it's still function properly. Happened to me. If you want the correct display, just refresh the page

jl777

legendary

Activity: 1176

Merit: 1134

went to -2540 blocks, 2543 orphaned blocks, 17803 unconfirmed transactions, within half an hour after redownloading block chain

36881      2584657662098653454      January 9, 2014 3:29:53 PM GMT+02:00
1      100 + 1      128 B
2      7115225331220974788      609 %

Not sure if this is relevant, but the My transactions window ends up with duplicate transactions listed some old transactions from last week are duplicated. I was having a lot of problems sending, i think due to system clock and 15 seconds issue.

December 30, 2013 5:24:37 AM GMT+02:00      2269220637361284198      2      1      -
December 30, 2013 7:25:03 AM GMT+02:00      2269220637361284198      11      1      -
December 30, 2013 7:32:50 AM GMT+02:00      2269220637361284198      10'000   10      -
December 30, 2013 7:39:10 AM GMT+02:00      2269220637361284198      90'000   90      -

Hmm... other than the duplicates in My Transactions, it seems that it is still moving forward:

36888      4747512364439223888      January 9, 2014 3:37:14 PM GMT+02:00
1      4 + 1      128 B
2      1819073736885755019      233 %

This seems to be an issue with NRS display? Just a bit worrisome about negative recent blocks, so many orphans and unconfirmed. Is this normal?

allwelder

legendary

Activity: 1512

Merit: 1004

Quote from: opticalcarrier on January 09, 2014, 08:13:41 AM

Quote from: jl777 on January 09, 2014, 08:00:43 AM

Quote from: jl777 on January 08, 2014, 09:51:21 PM

What web.xml options add most to stability of NXT server? The stability problems could simply be from suboptimal web.xml settings.

Does the 0.5.3 install use the most stable options in web.xml?
Are there any other files that need to be tweaked?

I am thinking that a lot of the problems in the field could be related to having a wrong set of settings. We are so close to a stable NXT server. I updated my peers list and now it is not going brain dead. Still need more time, but looking good so far.

The only thing that was changed was the list of peers, but I remember seeing a bunch of different tweaks. Has anybody tested the effect of the different tweaks on NXT server stability. So much work has been put into NXT, it would be a shame if a new NXT'er gets a bad experience due to suboptimal settings.

James

It got lost overnight Sad

Had the latest peers list, 0.5.3 and it had the usual bunch of orphans, etc. Maybe something about being on a Mac?

There is no way any large exchange will list NXT until the NXT server is stable. I am spending a lot of effort to smooth things over with peercover. Crashing or hanging servers, very bad

James

5.3 didnt seem to work well for me AT ALL. very frequent rolling back along with maxing out the fan, memory, and CPU. Went back to 5.1. At least thats how it worked on my PC. all my VPSs seem fine on 5.3 though

dont work well for me too.

chanc3r

sr. member

Activity: 952

Merit: 253

Quote from: ferment on January 09, 2014, 08:17:26 AM

Quote from: chanc3r on January 09, 2014, 08:12:55 AM

Hi - been helping Olivier test his iPhone client - one of the issues is fees for forged blocks are not showing up in the balance he builds from the transactions...

You have to walk the blockchain and find the blocks generated by the account and add up fees.

Hmm we thought that might be the case - kinda hoped it wasn't...

Damelon

legendary

Activity: 1092

Merit: 1010

Quote from: ?? on ??

"Once a deposit is made, the funds transferred become the property of DGEX.com and
the client can hold no claim for the funds displayed on their DGEX.com account..."

Am I the only one who finds this a very disturbing part of the terms and conditions?
I must confess this is the first time I've looked at the terms, too, so my own fault.

However, I did some research and these are out of the ordinary terms, basically stating: "My money is now yours"

This is totally different from any other exchange, where the money is referred to as "client money", which is held by the exchange on behalf of the client.

nexern

hero member

Activity: 597

Merit: 500

Quote from: opticalcarrier on January 09, 2014, 08:15:37 AM

Quote from: nexern on January 09, 2014, 08:12:20 AM

this is very usefull.

http://wiki.nxtcrypto.org/wiki/Nxt_API

who compiled this? can't find a donation account to support this work.

joefox runs the wiki, either he or one of his minions

ok, thanks.

ferment

full member

Activity: 168

Merit: 100

IDEX - LIVE Real-time DEX

Quote from: chanc3r on January 09, 2014, 08:12:55 AM

Hi - been helping Olivier test his iPhone client - one of the issues is fees for forged blocks are not showing up in the balance he builds from the transactions...

You have to walk the blockchain and find the blocks generated by the account and add up fees.

instacalm

hero member

Activity: 798

Merit: 500

Quote from: opticalcarrier on January 09, 2014, 08:15:37 AM

Quote from: nexern on January 09, 2014, 08:12:20 AM

this is very usefull.

http://wiki.nxtcrypto.org/wiki/Nxt_API

who compiled this? can't find a donation account to support this work.

joefox runs the wiki, either he or one of his minions

The first original version of the article was apparently put up by 85.250.115.130, an IP from Israel.

http://wiki.nxtcrypto.org/w/index.php?title=Nxt_API&action=history

BaiMangal

member

Activity: 111

Merit: 10

Quote from: nexern on January 09, 2014, 08:12:20 AM

this is very usefull.

http://wiki.nxtcrypto.org/wiki/Nxt_API

who compiled this? can't find a donation account to support this work.

class work yes!
very helpful indeed!!!

EmoneyRu

hero member

Activity: 600

Merit: 500

Nxt-kit developer

Quote from: opticalcarrier on January 09, 2014, 07:58:13 AM

Quote from: EmoneyRu on January 09, 2014, 12:04:01 AM

I converted .pem to openssh format. As said here it was not even needed. "note: PEM private keys are OpenSSH's native format for protocol 2 keys"

Check the username. For ubuntu default is "ubuntu"

amazons instructions were to use it like I have always used it "ssh -i PATHTOPEMFILE root@IPADDRES" yet it doesnt work. Surely there is someone there that can reset it?

You are still connecting with "root" username.
Use "ubuntu", Luke

opticalcarrier

full member

Activity: 238

Merit: 100

Quote from: nexern on January 09, 2014, 08:12:20 AM

this is very usefull.

http://wiki.nxtcrypto.org/wiki/Nxt_API

who compiled this? can't find a donation account to support this work.

joefox runs the wiki, either he or one of his minions

wesleyh

sr. member

Activity: 308

Merit: 250

Quote from: jl777 on January 09, 2014, 08:00:43 AM

Quote from: jl777 on January 08, 2014, 09:51:21 PM

What web.xml options add most to stability of NXT server? The stability problems could simply be from suboptimal web.xml settings.

Does the 0.5.3 install use the most stable options in web.xml?
Are there any other files that need to be tweaked?

I am thinking that a lot of the problems in the field could be related to having a wrong set of settings. We are so close to a stable NXT server. I updated my peers list and now it is not going brain dead. Still need more time, but looking good so far.

The only thing that was changed was the list of peers, but I remember seeing a bunch of different tweaks. Has anybody tested the effect of the different tweaks on NXT server stability. So much work has been put into NXT, it would be a shame if a new NXT'er gets a bad experience due to suboptimal settings.

James

It got lost overnight Sad

Had the latest peers list, 0.5.3 and it had the usual bunch of orphans, etc. Maybe something about being on a Mac?

There is no way any large exchange will list NXT until the NXT server is stable. I am spending a lot of effort to smooth things over with peercover. Crashing or hanging servers, very bad

James

Hey, I made NxtMac - which I presume is what you're using. I have no issues with it on 0.5.3 - can't be of further help though.. :/

opticalcarrier

full member

Activity: 238

Merit: 100

Quote from: jl777 on January 09, 2014, 08:00:43 AM

Quote from: jl777 on January 08, 2014, 09:51:21 PM

What web.xml options add most to stability of NXT server? The stability problems could simply be from suboptimal web.xml settings.

Does the 0.5.3 install use the most stable options in web.xml?
Are there any other files that need to be tweaked?

I am thinking that a lot of the problems in the field could be related to having a wrong set of settings. We are so close to a stable NXT server. I updated my peers list and now it is not going brain dead. Still need more time, but looking good so far.

The only thing that was changed was the list of peers, but I remember seeing a bunch of different tweaks. Has anybody tested the effect of the different tweaks on NXT server stability. So much work has been put into NXT, it would be a shame if a new NXT'er gets a bad experience due to suboptimal settings.

James

It got lost overnight Sad

Had the latest peers list, 0.5.3 and it had the usual bunch of orphans, etc. Maybe something about being on a Mac?

There is no way any large exchange will list NXT until the NXT server is stable. I am spending a lot of effort to smooth things over with peercover. Crashing or hanging servers, very bad

James

5.3 didnt seem to work well for me AT ALL. very frequent rolling back along with maxing out the fan, memory, and CPU. Went back to 5.1. At least thats how it worked on my PC. all my VPSs seem fine on 5.3 though

chanc3r

sr. member

Activity: 952

Merit: 253

Hi - been helping Olivier test his iPhone client - one of the issues is fees for forged blocks are not showing up in the balance he builds from the transactions...

He asked the question here

https://nextcoin.org/index.php/topic,2137.msg21112.html#msg21112

But no one answered and he couldn't find it in the Wiki - can anyone help here and I'll tell him or post a reply to this link - ta.

Basically we get;

Balance: 60272
Effective Balance 60276

The total of the transitions is 60272 - i.e. he's not picking up my previous forged 4 NXT!!
There must be something because it shows on the block explorer.

Thanks.

nexern

hero member

Activity: 597

Merit: 500

this is very usefull.

http://wiki.nxtcrypto.org/wiki/Nxt_API

who compiled this? can't find a donation account to support this work.

hoax

newbie

Activity: 36

Merit: 0

Quote from: Come-from-Beyond on January 06, 2014, 09:25:39 AM

Bounty announcement

100'000 NXT will be paid for working JavaScript code that signs and verifies signatures using NRS algo.

- The licence must allow to use the code in any application
- Sign/verify speed must be not lower than 100 signatures per second on a 1 GHz CPU (1 core)
- All the code must be in a single non-obfuscated well-formatted .js file
- Input/output values must be strings like "8302504e4e57c6c65335289879c6915a273d3aae7bd086058e403fcd2bc18341"

The bounty is valid till the 20th of January, 2014 12:00:00 UTC. The complete code must be published in this thread.

Currently i can't see solution for speed up my code to achieve goal, so i decided release it in current state. Other conditions are met.

https://github.com/moadib/nxt_crypto_js

On my PC(core i5 2.6ghz) JS code on Google V8(chrome, nodejs) took approx 200ms per signature.

The main problem is that JS doesn't support 64bit math, so script spend most time on emulating this.

instacalm

hero member

Activity: 798

Merit: 500

Quote from: Come-from-Beyond on January 09, 2014, 08:05:13 AM

Quote from: chanc3r on January 09, 2014, 07:57:09 AM

BCNext = Beyonce comes Next = Come from Beyonce ??

solved...

U could ask rickyjames to find BCNext and ask who he is...

BCNext resides in Russia... Wink

NxtChoice

full member

Activity: 238

Merit: 100

Quote from: opticalcarrier on January 09, 2014, 07:56:44 AM

Quote from: NxtChoice on January 09, 2014, 12:37:38 AM

Each post should has its own link url in this forum and we can exactly locate the post. For example, you post should be link https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.4401865

Edit: I also summarize a post for Nxt Client Update Link and see my signature.

not working for me, in my firefox browser. All those links including the one i just quoted from you, just go to the top of the page the post is on. so its prob just me then. I used to work for me though, no idea why it doesnt now.

Here my chorme works fine. Maybe it's the browser's problem.

Topic: NXT :: descendant of Bitcoin - Updated Information - page 1749. (Read 2761645 times)