Author

Topic: NXT :: descendant of Bitcoin - Updated Information - page 1752. (Read 2761645 times)

hero member
Activity: 600
Merit: 500
Nxt-kit developer
I suggest @info.nxtcrypto link @Luc's BTT post for each client update, so we can do a fast simple comparison with @Luc's post and confirm the sha256sum. If hacker replaced the download file and also replace sha256sum at info.nxtcrypto, it's not so easy to find it, but I think hack those 2 and Luc's account at the same time is more difficult.
See those *.asc files in the http://download.nxtcrypto.org/ directory? Those are GPG signatures of the corresponding zip files. If you download both nxt-client-0.5.3.zip and nxt-client-0.5.3.zip.asc in the same directory, you can run "gpg --verify nxt-client-0.5.3.zip.asc" to verify my signature of the zip package. This gives you one independent way of checking, and a hacker cannot provide a signature for a modified zip package without somehow stealing my private GPG key.

The nxt-client-0.5.3.zip.sha256.txt.asc is again a GPG signed file containing the sha256 sum. You can run "gpg --verify nxt-client-0.5.3.zip.sha256.txt.asc" to verify its content, then run "sha256sum -c nxt-client-0.5.3.zip.sha256.txt.asc" which will say "nxt-client-0.5.3.zip: OK" if the sha256 sum matches (ignore the warning about the extra lines, those are the gpg signature).

Finally, the value of the NRSversion alias on the blockchian contains the sha256 sum of the last stable release.

That gives you quite a few independent ways of verifying the package.


Add to this getting your public key based on "GPG key fingerprint" and it will be nice guide.

And yes, we definitely need nxt-client-latest to automate all this steps
hero member
Activity: 910
Merit: 1000
http://www.links.org/files/decentralised-currencies.pdf

Beyonce posted this a while back... Are there any discussions on bitcointalk about it?
legendary
Activity: 2142
Merit: 1010
Newbie
Can we implement my msg fee idea....you pay 1 Nxt in messenging fee every 1440 blocks to send messages to one other account....if you want to send to a new account you have to pay a fresh messaging fee.

We can. U just have to convince the community that it's a useful feature and find someone who will write the code.
legendary
Activity: 2184
Merit: 1000
What is the time frame for No. 2

Edit: or are things still in the planning phase?.....if yes....how long would it take to implement once plans are finalized?

~6 months, but this is a rough assessment. We don't need to hurry, copycoins can't outpace us anyway, coz not all details of TF were revealed. Asset Exchange, Alias System... none of these features r ground-breaking, only Transparent Forging is a real improvement.

Could we achieve msg per. day limit of a few million after that time...

Yes

Can we implement my msg fee idea....you pay 1 Nxt in messenging fee every 1440 blocks to send messages to one other account....if you want to send to a new account you have to pay a fresh messaging fee.




sr. member
Activity: 392
Merit: 250
I suggest @info.nxtcrypto link @Luc's BTT post for each client update, so we can do a fast simple comparison with @Luc's post and confirm the sha256sum. If hacker replaced the download file and also replace sha256sum at info.nxtcrypto, it's not so easy to find it, but I think hack those 2 and Luc's account at the same time is more difficult.
See those *.asc files in the http://download.nxtcrypto.org/ directory? Those are GPG signatures of the corresponding zip files. If you download both nxt-client-0.5.3.zip and nxt-client-0.5.3.zip.asc in the same directory, you can run "gpg --verify nxt-client-0.5.3.zip.asc" to verify my signature of the zip package. This gives you one independent way of checking, and a hacker cannot provide a signature for a modified zip package without somehow stealing my private GPG key.

The nxt-client-0.5.3.zip.sha256.txt.asc is again a GPG signed file containing the sha256 sum. You can run "gpg --verify nxt-client-0.5.3.zip.sha256.txt.asc" to verify its content, then run "sha256sum -c nxt-client-0.5.3.zip.sha256.txt.asc" which will say "nxt-client-0.5.3.zip: OK" if the sha256 sum matches (ignore the warning about the extra lines, those are the gpg signature).

Finally, the value of the NRSversion alias on the blockchian contains the sha256 sum of the last stable release.

That gives you quite a few independent ways of verifying the package.
legendary
Activity: 2142
Merit: 1010
Newbie
What is the time frame for No. 2

Edit: or are things still in the planning phase?.....if yes....how long would it take to implement once plans are finalized?

~6 months, but this is a rough assessment. We don't need to hurry, copycoins can't outpace us anyway, coz not all details of TF were revealed. Asset Exchange, Alias System... none of these features r ground-breaking, only Transparent Forging is a real improvement.

Could we achieve msg per. day limit of a few million after that time...

Yes
legendary
Activity: 2184
Merit: 1000
What is the time frame for No. 2

Edit: or are things still in the planning phase?.....if yes....how long would it take to implement once plans are finalized?

~6 months, but this is a rough assessment. We don't need to hurry, copycoins can't outpace us anyway, coz not all details of TF were revealed. Asset Exchange, Alias System... none of these features r ground-breaking, only Transparent Forging is a real improvement.

Could we achieve msg per. day limit of a few million after that time...
member
Activity: 82
Merit: 10

Does BCNext even work on this project anymore? Or did he already bought himself an island and retired?

What kind of project leader suddenly goes silent and abandons his creation like this?  Huh

Did you know that BCNext actually constantly posts in this topic? Wink

I get that feeling too. Wink
full member
Activity: 196
Merit: 100
I have to limit my reading on this forum, my paranoia is just under "don't trust the doctors."

If you are ready to take the red pill ( http://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Red_pill_and_blue_pill ), read theeconomiccollapseblog.com daily for two weeks.  At the end of that time, add zerohedge.com to your daily reading for the next two weeks.  At the end of the month, go pour yourself a glass of whiskey and sit on your back porch staring at the woods for an hour and ask yourself just what in the hell is going on.
legendary
Activity: 1512
Merit: 1004
When transfer nxt from A to B , after click the send money button,the browser is stuck and the java client collapsed.
What is the matter ? bug?

another suggestion:need to add a copy acc button on the browser client ,this will eliminate the chance of copy wrong acc number manually.
legendary
Activity: 2142
Merit: 1010
Newbie
What is the time frame for No. 2

Edit: or are things still in the planning phase?.....if yes....how long would it take to implement once plans are finalized?

~6 months, but this is a rough assessment. We don't need to hurry, copycoins can't outpace us anyway, coz not all details of TF were revealed. Asset Exchange, Alias System... none of these features r ground-breaking, only Transparent Forging is a real improvement.
hero member
Activity: 840
Merit: 1002
Simcoin Developer
We don't need BCNext anymore. He kickstarted the snowball with name "Nxt", the rest is our work.

That is my worst fear.
legendary
Activity: 1092
Merit: 1010
Shall we take some deep breaths here? Smiley

Nxtchg at least is worried and cares about his product.
This is something that's valuable in itself. I'm glad someone is looking out to protect his future customers.
Give him that, at least.





hero member
Activity: 910
Merit: 1000
And why do your posts getting more and more negatively tinted?

Because me and others post here detailed arguments about checksums and every time CfB replies with one-sentence bullshit, like "aliases are pretty good too".

Relax.

What, you 3 are so afraid of the cost of change, you willingly delude yourself into denial? What is it?

Ok, I'll tell u. We have plans that will make CRC on server side unnecessary. Can't tell u more right now.
hero member
Activity: 910
Merit: 1000
We don't need BCNext anymore. He kickstarted the snowball with name "Nxt", the rest is our work.

 Grin
legendary
Activity: 2184
Merit: 1000
1. How many messages per. day is the next limit after the present one?

2. When will this limit be expanded?

1. This is limited by technical capabilities of services like CloudFlare.

2. When we implement Pooled Forging and Transparent Forging.


What is the time frame for No. 2

Edit: or are things still in the planning phase?.....if yes....how long would it take to implement once plans are finalized?
full member
Activity: 193
Merit: 100
I found some interesting stuff about poker games:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mental_poker
http://blog.cryptographyengineering.com/2012/04/poker-is-hard-especially-for.html

which lead to project CHARM http://charm-crypto.com/Main.html.

@nexern : Will your client have plug-in interface available? so we can develop any poker game via AM?
legendary
Activity: 2142
Merit: 1010
Newbie
I think BCNext has more important things to do instead of answering hunders of same (or new) stupid (or smart) questions.

I believe that BCNext is actually here doing all that and I am truly afraid that we might be getting close to the day that he STOPS!!!   Undecided

We don't need BCNext anymore. He kickstarted the snowball with name "Nxt", the rest is our work.
full member
Activity: 224
Merit: 100
And why do your posts getting more and more negatively tinted?

Because me and others post here detailed arguments about checksums and every time CfB replies with one-sentence bullshit, like "aliases are pretty good too".

He acts like a religious fanatic who ignores any reasons and just repeats his religious dogmas.

If that's the voice of BCNext, I am scared.

If they see no benefit with checksums, then they must have a reason. Why do you assume they are being irrational?
legendary
Activity: 2142
Merit: 1010
Newbie
1. How many messages per. day is the next limit after the present one?

2. When will this limit be expanded?

1. This is limited by technical capabilities of services like CloudFlare.

2. When we implement Pooled Forging and Transparent Forging.
Jump to: