Agreed (minus the vulgar language), we can market AE when it's finished with testing and we are happy with it.
Btw, who is really testing it? I got only a few bug reports.
I don't really need AE working (I'm not a trader and don't need to IPO anything), so I can wait till April. The community should focus on testing if it does need AE.
hm well ... I have tested all the basic functions: placeOrder (bis/ask) cancelOrder(bid/ask),issueAsset, transferAsset, trade. Fetch bidorder/askorder as TX from trade.
The bug with the 'not enough funds'. I am still missing out on the scaling - whether it is 0.01nxt or 1 nxt, little things like that.
May main focus atm is getting the modelView pulled straight in Qt, and then I'll have to switch from GET to POST in requests.
What about a liquid market? How can we simulate one? What kind of test cases can we come up with? Who actually IS testing the AE on the testNET? For sure I know about jl777 and myself but there are 2 or three others - wesleyh / nexern / marcus03 ??
Please chime in whoever is testing, so we can cook up something more lively!
yes, we have to setup a more reallistic AE scenario and put some heavy load to predefined assets.
i would suggest to coordinate this wthin the next days because we need a precise account balance
tracking for this. i just added additional logfiles within the client to trace the balance and found some
small diffs. not sure yet if this is a bug or not or a minor error within my code.
all basic functions a workig very well from my side and the AE is cool. we need ths AE soon to built
a bunch of services on top of this.
.
