I could use some TestNXT, thanks! 7502128414076890972
- 5k testNXT sent. 
Topic: NXT :: descendant of Bitcoin - Updated Information - page 653. (Read 2761638 times)
If someone need testNXT, write here, or PM me.
Yesterday I've tested AE a bit.. no problem found yet. You can try to buy some of my ABCs on testnet.
Yesterday I've tested AE a bit.. no problem found yet. You can try to buy some of my ABCs on testnet.
I could use some TestNXT, thanks!
7502128414076890972
Androklis Polymenis (me) donates a million digital NXT coins to BPF! $43,000. Press release [PDF]: http://goo.gl/t8tWY8
https://twitter.com/Lets_Upgrade/status/438525224368107520
wow,so generous.https://twitter.com/Lets_Upgrade/status/438525224368107520
This needs more media coverage. Anyone has account with http://service.prweb.com/ ?
Don't know if this has been re-posted here yet, (I'm still in 1968), found it on nextcoin.org:
Kittehcoin is winning at the moment.......
Tyke is writing a book about crypto currency and he wants to explain a few alt coins in the book.
You can vote for Nxt here:
https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/cryptocurrency-the-alt-ernative-beginners-reference-book-483187
You can vote for Nxt here:
https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/cryptocurrency-the-alt-ernative-beginners-reference-book-483187
Kittehcoin is winning at the moment.......
One final thing I will say about the (lack of proper) statistical analysis is that for my own involvement in Nxt I would rather be paid in BTC (if I am to be paid anything at all).
I have read proper statistical papers (such as created by Meni) with sound math describing all of the possible attacks upon Bitcoin and I am much more satisfied with that then the "just trust BCNext's algorithm argument" who himself btw actually stated "don't trust me".
It seems that things like "proper analysis" are not things that this community wants to do or even hear about.
I have read proper statistical papers (such as created by Meni) with sound math describing all of the possible attacks upon Bitcoin and I am much more satisfied with that then the "just trust BCNext's algorithm argument" who himself btw actually stated "don't trust me".
It seems that things like "proper analysis" are not things that this community wants to do or even hear about.
I bet most of us believe that BCNext did math analysis and found no flaws.
We should not assume this and do our own analysis. Even the smartest people make mistakes.
My web client? Ya, doesn't update the balance at all times, will fix later.
yup, could it also be an issue with the different values "balance"/"effectiveBalance"/"unconfirmedBalance" ?
yeah, could be will have to check!
My web client? Ya, doesn't update the balance at all times, will fix later.
yup, could it also be an issue with the different values "balance"/"effectiveBalance"/"unconfirmedBalance" ?
could you send me some more please? -> 9998590259914237067
- 20k testNXT sent!@ AE devs, did you made a balance tracking already and if so did you found any diffs between your
filled/cancel orders if you unroll them back to inital balance?
ps: thx abctc
Unconfirmed balance bug is not fixed yet.
didn't mean this one but the account balance showed by NRS differs from API request after trading.
with balance tracking i mean also to ensure the balance has the correct calculated amount
after heavy trading and order cancel when calculating all fees and prices and then roll them back.
both numbers need to match of course. i think this has to be tested too but it seems i am the only one
looking into this atm.
have probably the same issues, but I'm not sure if it is related to the web client...
My web client? Ya, doesn't update the balance at all times, will fix later.
could you send me some more please? -> 9998590259914237067
- 20k testNXT sent!@ AE devs, did you made a balance tracking already and if so did you found any diffs between your
filled/cancel orders if you unroll them back to inital balance?
ps: thx abctc
Unconfirmed balance bug is not fixed yet.
didn't mean this one but the account balance showed by NRS differs from API request after trading.
with balance tracking i mean also to ensure the balance has the correct calculated amount
after heavy trading and order cancel when calculating all fees and prices and then roll them back.
both numbers need to match of course. i think this has to be tested too but it seems i am the only one
looking into this atm.
have probably the same issues, but I'm not sure if it is related to the web client...
could you send me some more please? -> 9998590259914237067
- 20k testNXT sent!@ AE devs, did you made a balance tracking already and if so did you found any diffs between your
filled/cancel orders if you unroll them back to inital balance?
ps: thx abctc
Unconfirmed balance bug is not fixed yet.
didn't mean this one but the account balance showed by NRS differs from API request after trading.
with balance tracking i mean also to ensure the balance has the correct calculated amount
after heavy trading and order cancel when calculating all fees and prices and then roll them back.
both numbers need to match of course. i think this has to be tested too but it seems i am the only one
looking into this atm.
NXT FUNDING COMMITTEE VOTE STARTS IN 53 HOURS
AT 12:01 AM MARCH 1 (UTC)
Remaining eligible nominees with as-yet undeclared intentions (PM me if you want off this list):
2Kool4Skewl, Arckam_(frmelin), bitcoinpaul, buybitcoinscanada, Cointropolis_JustabitTime, Come-from-Beyond
Damelon, davethetrousers, drevil, ferment, Fry, hughmanwho, Jean-Luc, jl777, Klee, landomata, laowai80, msin, mww
nexern, opticalcarrier, PeercoinEnthusiast, Pouncer, Ricot, SecondLeo, smaragda, VanBreuk, ZeroTheGreat
Something Zahlen said: A candidate does not need to be good at writing English. Some candidates may not have English as their mother tongue. If you're voting, don't confuse lots of writing for ability to judge the worth of a project. Remember that ultimately the committee's job is to decide which projects get funded.
If you are on this list and want to be on a NXT funding committee, go here:
https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.5280476
Background:
https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.5280786
WE NOW HAVE A FULL SLATE
(Actually, antanst was a little late to the nominee party and was never on the blue list above. But he's a coder, he runs multiple NXT nodes and he wrote the NXT Reddit tipbot. Since I'm drunk with power and making the rules here, I say he's now a candidate for techdev. If you disagree, don't vote for him - run against him!).
(However, I am not so drunk that I'm gonna let just anybody on this slate. Newbie BC.NXT has posted on the candidate thread. However, after checking his credentials and posting background, I will not be listing him on the ballot. To quote the mythical American television commercial: Sorry, Charley, only the best tuna get to be Star-Kist.)
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Full_slate
Good luck to these nominees who have declared themselves candidates:
NXTmarketingfund: allwelder, Damelon, Mario123, Asian Prepper, joefox, brooklynbct, CoinTropolis_NiftyNikel, Uniqueorn, salsacz
NXTtechdevfund: EmoneyRu, Anon136, l8orre, abuelau, antanst
NXTinfrastructurefund: rickyjames, chanc3r, EvilDave, pandaisftw, ChuckOne, ^[GS]^
Yeah, you may have seen this before. I'll be putting it up every ten pages or so. It's one of those "legitimate, transparent process" things.
AT 12:01 AM MARCH 1 (UTC)
Remaining eligible nominees with as-yet undeclared intentions (PM me if you want off this list):
2Kool4Skewl, Arckam_(frmelin), bitcoinpaul, buybitcoinscanada, Cointropolis_JustabitTime, Come-from-Beyond
Damelon, davethetrousers, drevil, ferment, Fry, hughmanwho, Jean-Luc, jl777, Klee, landomata, laowai80, msin, mww
nexern, opticalcarrier, PeercoinEnthusiast, Pouncer, Ricot, SecondLeo, smaragda, VanBreuk, ZeroTheGreat
Something Zahlen said: A candidate does not need to be good at writing English. Some candidates may not have English as their mother tongue. If you're voting, don't confuse lots of writing for ability to judge the worth of a project. Remember that ultimately the committee's job is to decide which projects get funded.
If you are on this list and want to be on a NXT funding committee, go here:
https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.5280476
Background:
https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.5280786
WE NOW HAVE A FULL SLATE
(Actually, antanst was a little late to the nominee party and was never on the blue list above. But he's a coder, he runs multiple NXT nodes and he wrote the NXT Reddit tipbot. Since I'm drunk with power and making the rules here, I say he's now a candidate for techdev. If you disagree, don't vote for him - run against him!).
(However, I am not so drunk that I'm gonna let just anybody on this slate. Newbie BC.NXT has posted on the candidate thread. However, after checking his credentials and posting background, I will not be listing him on the ballot. To quote the mythical American television commercial: Sorry, Charley, only the best tuna get to be Star-Kist.)
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Full_slate
Good luck to these nominees who have declared themselves candidates:
NXTmarketingfund: allwelder, Damelon, Mario123, Asian Prepper, joefox, brooklynbct, CoinTropolis_NiftyNikel, Uniqueorn, salsacz
NXTtechdevfund: EmoneyRu, Anon136, l8orre, abuelau, antanst
NXTinfrastructurefund: rickyjames, chanc3r, EvilDave, pandaisftw, ChuckOne, ^[GS]^
Yeah, you may have seen this before. I'll be putting it up every ten pages or so. It's one of those "legitimate, transparent process" things.
I have no freakin' clue why you come to this conclusion. I am extremely satisfied with and thankful for your contribution and we all discussed the algo today. Why do you suddenly think no one wants this?
Thanks for the kind words - it is perhaps a combination of being tired, not getting anyone else to work on the simulation and just getting more and more suggestions for alternative ways to do things when we don't already even know what it is doing that has led to me needing to "give it a rest".
You deserve your rest but please, after that, keep it coming. I think the most of us are just silent (or suggest incentive ideas) because they have no clue what you are talking about.
+1, i think that everyone is happy that people like @CIYAM are part of Nxt! When he proposed discussing a chnage in forging, people (including me) did't like it only because i thought the reason was "fairness", but he obviously had something much different in mind. Plus, BCnext wanted people discussing his ideas, right?
Actually 0.8.2 allows POST so why does this not work?
I also tried
I also tried
Code:
> curl -X POST -H "Content-Type:application/json" --form "secretPhrase=xxx&requestType=getAccountId" http://127.0.0.1:7876/nxt
{"errorCode":1,"errorDescription":"Incorrect request"}
{"errorCode":1,"errorDescription":"Incorrect request"}
Clearly NRS can't read parameters sent this way... Better ask Jean-Luc then.
POST works in javascript, why not CURL. I assume it's the same syntax? hmmm
Actually 0.8.2 allows POST so why does this not work?
I also tried
I also tried
Code:
> curl -X POST -H "Content-Type:application/json" --form "secretPhrase=xxx&requestType=getAccountId" http://127.0.0.1:7876/nxt
{"errorCode":1,"errorDescription":"Incorrect request"}
{"errorCode":1,"errorDescription":"Incorrect request"}
Clearly NRS can't read parameters sent this way... Better ask Jean-Luc then.
Hey, bittrex asks why this doesn't work:
What is wrong here?
Code:
> curl -X POST -H "Content-Type:application/json" --data "secretPhrase=xxx" http://127.0.0.1:7876/nxt?requestType=getAccountId
{"errorCode":3,"errorDescription":"\"secretPhrase\" not specified"}
{"errorCode":3,"errorDescription":"\"secretPhrase\" not specified"}
What is wrong here?
secretPhrase not specified.
Should be http://127.0.0.1:7876/nxt?requestType=getAccountId&secretPhrase=123Actually 0.8.2 allows POST so why does this not work? (--data == post)
I also tried
Code:
> curl -X POST -H "Content-Type:application/json" --data "secretPhrase=xxx&requestType=getAccountId" http://127.0.0.1:7876/nxt
{"errorCode":1,"errorDescription":"Incorrect request"}
{"errorCode":1,"errorDescription":"Incorrect request"}
If someone need testNXT, write here, or PM me.
Yesterday I've tested AE a bit.. no problem found yet. You can try to buy some of my ABCs on testnet.
Yesterday I've tested AE a bit.. no problem found yet. You can try to buy some of my ABCs on testnet.
could you send me some more please? -> 9998590259914237067
thx abctc
me 2, please 14982679201235752929
Hey, bittrex asks why this doesn't work:
What is wrong here?
Code:
> curl -X POST -H "Content-Type:application/json" --data "secretPhrase=xxx" http://127.0.0.1:7876/nxt?requestType=getAccountId
{"errorCode":3,"errorDescription":"\"secretPhrase\" not specified"}
{"errorCode":3,"errorDescription":"\"secretPhrase\" not specified"}
What is wrong here?
secretPhrase not specified.
Should be http://127.0.0.1:7876/nxt?requestType=getAccountId&secretPhrase=xxx I have no freakin' clue why you come to this conclusion. I am extremely satisfied with and thankful for your contribution and we all discussed the algo today. Why do you suddenly think no one wants this?
Thanks for the kind words - it is perhaps a combination of being tired, not getting anyone else to work on the simulation and just getting more and more suggestions for alternative ways to do things when we don't already even know what it is doing that has led to me needing to "give it a rest".
everyone is here to help to be successful nxt
I encourage you
You are doing a great job!!
Hey, bittrex asks why this doesn't work:
What is wrong here?
Code:
> curl -X POST -H "Content-Type:application/json" --data "secretPhrase=xxx" http://127.0.0.1:7876/nxt?requestType=getAccountId
{"errorCode":3,"errorDescription":"\"secretPhrase\" not specified"}
{"errorCode":3,"errorDescription":"\"secretPhrase\" not specified"}
What is wrong here?
One final thing I will say about the (lack of proper) statistical analysis is that for my own involvement in Nxt I would rather be paid in BTC (if I am to be paid anything at all).
I have read proper statistical papers (such as created by Meni) with sound math describing all of the possible attacks upon Bitcoin and I am much more satisfied with that then the "just trust BCNext's algorithm argument" who himself btw actually stated "don't trust me".
It seems that things like "proper analysis" are not things that this community wants to do or even hear about.
I have read proper statistical papers (such as created by Meni) with sound math describing all of the possible attacks upon Bitcoin and I am much more satisfied with that then the "just trust BCNext's algorithm argument" who himself btw actually stated "don't trust me".
It seems that things like "proper analysis" are not things that this community wants to do or even hear about.
i for one appreciated hearing about your statistical analysis. i didn't say anything to you about it because it seems like you usually don't respond to my posts. it could be that im just missing your responses or something, i dont follow everything in this thread.
Jump to: