Author

Topic: ODI cricket and general cricketing discussion [self - mod] - page 1075. (Read 160662 times)

full member
Activity: 896
Merit: 236
snip


Not really that tough as you are thinking. Long before the 200 from Sachin, it was also said to be impossible and Rohit made it 263/264. Watson was the player may be who made 176 from 76 balls in ODI. As an opener, it is possible to get 350 and I believe after couple of year we will have a name for that.
You do understand that for scoring 350 runs, the opener has to face something around 200 balls with a strike rate of 175+. I highly doubt a player will have an opportunity to face 2/3rd of the balls being bowled and scoring without getting out at a strike rate of 175 is definitely not easy.
Few peoples feel this is magic but really a tough job because 350 runs by a batsman in an inning of 300 total balls you can do this only with blind cricket but still very hard case in ODI as @akhjob already describe few things this need surely some good number of balls no easy work guys.
sr. member
Activity: 1050
Merit: 416
Buy Bitcoin
Yeah First striker + Selfless partner (Dravid)... Hypothetical scenario so nothing could go wrong here, we already got world record.  Smiley
May be we form a bitcointalk cricket team, me and akhjob will open the innings after winning the toss, JSRAW will bowl, I will be in the striking end and akhjob will be the selfless batting partner who will let me take 3 runs in the last ball of every overs :-P

Who else wants to join the showdown? :-D

The venue could be somewhere in Middle East. 

Bowlers are modern day labourers in this scenario so yeah can do all the manual job like a slave Cheesy
Ah Dravid, definitely a selfless player. If Royse and you are ready for creating history, I can also be a selfless partner because that's the easiest job comparatively Tongue



Not really that tough as you are thinking. Long before the 200 from Sachin, it was also said to be impossible and Rohit made it 263/264. Watson was the player may be who made 176 from 76 balls in ODI. As an opener, it is possible to get 350 and I believe after couple of year we will have a name for that.
You do understand that for scoring 350 runs, the opener has to face something around 200 balls with a strike rate of 175+. I highly doubt a player will have an opportunity to face 2/3rd of the balls being bowled and scoring without getting out at a strike rate of 175 is definitely not easy.
legendary
Activity: 2464
Merit: 3878
Hire Bitcointalk Camp. Manager @ r7promotions.com
Bowlers are modern day labourers in this scenario so yeah can do all the manual job like a slave Cheesy
These days it's not easy to convince people to bowl. Good thing that you accepted it :-D


Quote
I voluntary agree to bite the bullet and will sell my G.F for sponsoring the team, if we are still short then all of you can do the same  Grin In these time only savage and pathetic can survive  Tongue

The idea is not bad at all. Let me know how much you get from selling her. This will give me an idea of the current market value. Selling them somehow helpful for the personal finance as well especially in this pandemic crisis :-D

member
Activity: 854
Merit: 10
350 by a player is really tough as its really need some good skills and luck if you are going from current players then surely I am going only for two players and they are Rohit and Warner about Smith its really hard or we can say mission impossible because he is never been good in this format.
Not really that tough as you are thinking. Long before the 200 from Sachin, it was also said to be impossible and Rohit made it 263/264. Watson was the player may be who made 176 from 76 balls in ODI. As an opener, it is possible to get 350 and I believe after couple of year we will have a name for that.

Yes, previously it was very tough Job to score 200 runs when Rohit Sharma enters, he easily scores more than 2 times. It is based on their skills and their dominating technique will easily help them to score them easily. Every decade we might see a new person will be like a torch banner to turn cricket into the next level.
legendary
Activity: 2184
Merit: 1540
Yeah First striker + Selfless partner (Dravid)... Hypothetical scenario so nothing could go wrong here, we already got world record.  Smiley
May be we form a bitcointalk cricket team, me and akhjob will open the innings after winning the toss, JSRAW will bowl, I will be in the striking end and akhjob will be the selfless batting partner who will let me take 3 runs in the last ball of every overs :-P

Who else wants to join the showdown? :-D

The venue could be somewhere in Middle East. 

Bowlers are modern day labourers in this scenario so yeah can do all the manual job like a slave Cheesy

@Royse777 first of all we’ll need to find few sponsorers for the team,
I voluntary agree to bite the bullet and will sell my G.F for sponsoring the team, if we are still short then all of you can do the same  Grin In these time only savage and pathetic can survive  Tongue

hero member
Activity: 2646
Merit: 686
Yeah First striker + Selfless partner (Dravid)... Hypothetical scenario so nothing could go wrong here, we already got world record.  Smiley
May be we form a bitcointalk cricket team, me and akhjob will open the innings after winning the toss, JSRAW will bowl, I will be in the striking end and akhjob will be the selfless batting partner who will let me take 3 runs in the last ball of every overs :-P

Who else wants to join the showdown? :-D

The venue could be somewhere in Middle East.  

@Royse777 first of all we’ll need to find few sponsorers for the team, and then secondly we’ll need a new name for the team as I’m not sure whether @thermos would allow us to use bitcointalk name so let’s figure out a good name for the team. Lastly I’ll take the spot of Pollard or Maxwell as whenever I see a ball bouncing towards me, I immediately swing my bat to send it to the stands so I’ll take the role of finishing the innings for the team if you allow me too.
legendary
Activity: 2464
Merit: 3878
Hire Bitcointalk Camp. Manager @ r7promotions.com
Yeah First striker + Selfless partner (Dravid)... Hypothetical scenario so nothing could go wrong here, we already got world record.  Smiley
May be we form a bitcointalk cricket team, me and akhjob will open the innings after winning the toss, JSRAW will bowl, I will be in the striking end and akhjob will be the selfless batting partner who will let me take 3 runs in the last ball of every overs :-P

Who else wants to join the showdown? :-D

The venue could be somewhere in Middle East. 
legendary
Activity: 2156
Merit: 2100
Marketing Campaign Manager |Telegram ID- @LT_Mouse
350 by a player is really tough as its really need some good skills and luck if you are going from current players then surely I am going only for two players and they are Rohit and Warner about Smith its really hard or we can say mission impossible because he is never been good in this format.
Not really that tough as you are thinking. Long before the 200 from Sachin, it was also said to be impossible and Rohit made it 263/264. Watson was the player may be who made 176 from 76 balls in ODI. As an opener, it is possible to get 350 and I believe after couple of year we will have a name for that.
member
Activity: 476
Merit: 62
350 runs is really big. IMO In real world setting even 300 runs looks impossible. But if i have to bet on any opener then will go with Rohit sharma.
Remember the old days when the entire team used to score something between 250-300 and we all thought that was an epic score? This is why I am pretty confident that someone out there will touch 350 at some point in the next decade.

I would bet on someone like Smith or Warner to achieve something so humungous against a lower ranked team probably.
350 by a player is really tough as its really need some good skills and luck if you are going from current players then surely I am going only for two players and they are Rohit and Warner about Smith its really hard or we can say mission impossible because he is never been good in this format.
legendary
Activity: 2184
Merit: 1540
350 runs is really big. IMO In real world setting even 300 runs looks impossible. But if i have to bet on any opener then will go with Rohit sharma.
Remember the old days when the entire team used to score something between 250-300 and we all thought that was an epic score? This is why I am pretty confident that someone out there will touch 350 at some point in the next decade.

I would bet on someone like Smith or Warner to achieve something so humungous against a lower ranked team probably.
I can think about Warner as he's attacking batsman and his conversion rate from 50 to 100 is very good but Smith? I have fair amount of doubt on Smith. he's unstoppable in the test format but in limited over cricket he's only above average, not extraordinary.
hero member
Activity: 3178
Merit: 977
www.Crypto.Games: Multiple coins, multiple games
350 runs is really big. IMO In real world setting even 300 runs looks impossible. But if i have to bet on any opener then will go with Rohit sharma.
Remember the old days when the entire team used to score something between 250-300 and we all thought that was an epic score? This is why I am pretty confident that someone out there will touch 350 at some point in the next decade.

I would bet on someone like Smith or Warner to achieve something so humungous against a lower ranked team probably.
sr. member
Activity: 1988
Merit: 453
But if i have to bet on any opener then will go with Rohit sharma.
There's only one player comes to my mind when we talk about a tripple; it's Rohit of course. Anyone here wants a bet on that? Well, forget about tripple century. Who will be the next player to hit the double? What do you think guys? Do you want to have bet on this?

The next double may come sooner than you would expect. With every passing year, bowlers are losing their relevance in international cricket. The boundaries are getting shorter and even grounds such as WACA and Kingsmead (which once used to terrorize the batsmen) have become very flat now. When Rohit got his double back then (in 2014 against Sri Lanka), it was somewhat unimaginable. But that is no longer the case now. Even women players such as Amelia Kerr have achieved this feat.
hero member
Activity: 1302
Merit: 532
But if i have to bet on any opener then will go with Rohit sharma.
There's only one player comes to my mind when we talk about a tripple; it's Rohit of course. Anyone here wants a bet on that? Well, forget about tripple century. Who will be the next player to hit the double? What do you think guys? Do you want to have bet on this?
It is hard task to score a double century let alone a triple century in ODI, you need to have a stamina that is out of this world to be able to bat for that long, it took a long time since someone thought a double century in ODI is possible and Sachin made that possible and then the rest of the players tried to reach that goal and a few were successful.
Players like David Warner and Jason Roy have the strike rate to score a double.
sr. member
Activity: 1512
Merit: 316
But if i have to bet on any opener then will go with Rohit sharma.
There's only one player comes to my mind when we talk about a tripple; it's Rohit of course. Anyone here wants a bet on that? Well, forget about tripple century. Who will be the next player to hit the double? What do you think guys? Do you want to have bet on this?

Considering the possibilities and the past performance till now the name stands in many people mind's is Rohit Sharma only. But yes, we can have some extra ordinarily one of the innings by some other players as well but that would be just once. When we talk about consistency or player who has higher chances of reaching it then it is Rohit Sharma for me too.
hero member
Activity: 1358
Merit: 851
But if i have to bet on any opener then will go with Rohit sharma.
There's only one player comes to my mind when we talk about a tripple; it's Rohit of course. Anyone here wants a bet on that? Well, forget about tripple century. Who will be the next player to hit the double? What do you think guys? Do you want to have bet on this?
legendary
Activity: 2184
Merit: 1540
~Hypothetical rambling~
And that guy has to be in the striking end when they open.

This calculation is okay in pen and paper but in no way possible even if you let them to bat against an under 11 blowers LOL
+ The non striker batsmen should also be selfless to let his partner score 3 runs at the end of every over  Tongue H

Yeah First striker + Selfless partner (Dravid)... Hypothetical scenario so nothing could go wrong here, we already got world record.  Smiley

The maximum score that a player can score realistically in my opinion is around 350 under the right conditions. The current highest score is 264 by Rohit Sharma and the next one is 237 by Martin Guptill.
350 runs is really big. IMO In real world setting even 300 runs looks impossible. But if i have to bet on any opener then will go with Rohit sharma.
hero member
Activity: 3178
Merit: 977
www.Crypto.Games: Multiple coins, multiple games
This calculation is okay in pen and paper but in no way possible even if you let them to bat against an under 11 blowers LOL
The maximum score that a player can score realistically in my opinion is around 350 under the right conditions. The current highest score is 264 by Rohit Sharma and the next one is 237 by Martin Guptill.

Unrealistically, I agree with the calculation that JSRAW came up with since that is the best option and it makes complete sense if you think about it.
sr. member
Activity: 1050
Merit: 416
Buy Bitcoin
During these isolation times, there is a whatsapp forward message which is about cricket and I thought it would be good if I share here so that you people may kill your boredom somewhat.

Here you go: How many number of runs an opener will be able to score maximum in an ODI match (in 50 overs or 300 balls) given that there is no wide or no-balls is bowled. (It is all about the maximum possible runs for a player in ODI by assuming a power hitter like Chris Gayle or Rohit Sharma is a player).

It would be fun reading if you guys share your thoughts along with logical explanation rather than just stating some numbers Smiley.

Well...

1 over has 6 balls

so 5 sixes in first 5 ball and 3 runs in the last ball so that he can keep strike. ( 5*6 + 3 =33 runs in one over)

Repeat this process for 49th overs.

33 runs * 49 overs = 1617 runs

And in 50th over he can hit 6 sixes (6*6 =36 runs)

1617 + 36 = 1653 runs in an ODI
And that guy has to be in the striking end when they open.
+ The non striker batsmen should also be selfless to let his partner score 3 runs at the end of every over  Tongue He can always stop running after they scored a couple in the last ball causing the opener 33 runs in the successive overs  Tongue

So the maximum possible runs a batsman could score without the help of any others is 36*25=900
legendary
Activity: 2464
Merit: 3878
Hire Bitcointalk Camp. Manager @ r7promotions.com
During these isolation times, there is a whatsapp forward message which is about cricket and I thought it would be good if I share here so that you people may kill your boredom somewhat.

Here you go: How many number of runs an opener will be able to score maximum in an ODI match (in 50 overs or 300 balls) given that there is no wide or no-balls is bowled. (It is all about the maximum possible runs for a player in ODI by assuming a power hitter like Chris Gayle or Rohit Sharma is a player).

It would be fun reading if you guys share your thoughts along with logical explanation rather than just stating some numbers Smiley.

Well...

1 over has 6 balls

so 5 sixes in first 5 ball and 3 runs in the last ball so that he can keep strike. ( 5*6 + 3 =33 runs in one over)

Repeat this process for 49th overs.

33 runs * 49 overs = 1617 runs

And in 50th over he can hit 6 sixes (6*6 =36 runs)

1617 + 36 = 1653 runs in an ODI
And that guy has to be in the striking end when they open.

This calculation is okay in pen and paper but in no way possible even if you let them to bat against an under 11 blowers LOL
hero member
Activity: 3178
Merit: 977
www.Crypto.Games: Multiple coins, multiple games
Right now its holding up pretty good considering it already took a dive to sub $3900 range and halving is 35 days away so i am bullish for next 1.5 years. Crazy Bull run seems tough this year but no one has crystal ball so its highly speculative. TBH i would be very happy if BTC touch the $15000-$16000 mark by the EOY.
I actually expected Coronavirus to help BTC in a big way initially since it is digital money and is easier to access when compared to physical FIAT under current lockdown conditions across the world, but the opposite happened and the world stuck to FIAT mostly.

This just goes to prove that mainstream acceptance of BTC and other popular crypto as currencies is a dream. BTC continues to be viewed as a speculative asset primarily and currency secondarily.
Jump to: