You didn't even read your source, right? How come splitting the points is bias? Same thing happened for Australia vs South Africa and New Zealand vs Srilanka series.
Ehsan Mani should say that they wants all points for themselves similar to 2016. As for BCCI, they already made clear multiple times that without government clearance they can't play any Bilateral series. Its a right time that PCB should stop trying and accept the reality which we all are facing. Its a fact that politics and terrorism is fucking up cricket diplomacy. Series was schedule was around July-November 2019. Don't tell me that you are not aware of what happened between both countries during that timeline?
I know that the series was not being played between the two countries because of political tensions but it was more strong recalcitrant behavior from India not willing to play with Pakistan. Pakistan is never afraid to play with India and is always willing to play.
You only showing your immatureness to others by replying like this. no point in replying you for this statement.
Ehsan Mani should say that they wants all points for themselves similar to 2016.
Yes , Eshan Mani is saying that we should get all the 6 points this time also, as we did get in 2016. The only difference is that in 2016, India did not informed
in written that
THEY WILL NOT PLAY and this time around they informed in written and early
THEY WILL NOT PLAY. So whats the difference in approach ? But difference in decision taken by ICC by splitting points this time.
This time around, the BCCI engaged with the ICC early on in this round of the Women's Championship, making its stand clear about why it could not play Pakistan in the ODI series scheduled in 2019. ESPNcricinfo understands the BCCI made extensive submissions as early as 2018 demonstrating that it could not get the relevant permission from the Indian government to play Pakistan. That helped the ICC's technical committee to invoke the force majeure clause on this occasion.
Due to the splitting of points (three to India, three to Pakistan), India qualify as the fourth-placed team on the ICC Women's Championship table with 23 points, behind Australia (37), England (29) and South Africa (25). Had all six points gone to Pakistan, they would have qualified with 22 points, ahead of India with 20.
In 2016, the ICC decided to give Pakistan full points when India failed to show up for a series, but there is one difference that looks to have secured a more desirable outcome for the BCCI. On that occasion, the BCCI offered no written explanation for the failure to proceed with the series, and the technical investigation committee found the BCCI had not been able to establish "acceptable reasons" for non-participation in the series.
This time around, the BCCI engaged with the ICC early on, making its stand clear about why it could not play Pakistan in the ODI series scheduled in 2019.
The ruling is particularly significant for Pakistan because had the ICC awarded them all six points, as was the case in a similar scenario in 2016, Pakistan would have qualified for the playoffs automatically, while India would have had to go through the qualifiers for the Women's World Cup.
"We are of course disappointed with the decision, but our team (comprising the CEO, legal department, and other heads) is reviewing the matter. Once that's done, we will be able to comment," Mani told Sportstar.
and moreover there is no news available like we have now and during that time even i was convinced that they would rematch even though they announced the results that Sri Lanka would go through the finals.