Author

Topic: ODI cricket and general cricketing discussion [self - mod] - page 750. (Read 170819 times)

legendary
Activity: 3346
Merit: 1352
Leading Crypto Sports Betting & Casino Platform
If you take the stats into account in ODI, Tim Southee never had a great performance against India in my memory and even if you check his economy against India is well over 6.15 but on the other hand Trent Boult does bowl well against India and even in a hypothetical situation with the form the Indian batsmen were in, i doubt they could have made any difference.

That may be true. But given how poorly the New Zealand pacers performed (especially Tickner, Duffy and Shipley), I think Boult or Southee would have performed far better. Lockie Ferguson was the only bowler who held his nerves against India. Anyway, the pitches were very unsupportive for the pace bowlers and therefore even the experienced bowlers would have struggled. On top of that, New Zealand is not a team with depth in their player strength, unlike the case with India, Australia or England. If 2-3 if their main players are unavailable, that will impact their performance.
hero member
Activity: 2814
Merit: 911
Have Fun )@@( Stay Safe
~
while in this series most of good performance were shown by indian fast bowler compare to spinner so if Tim Southee and Trent Boult were included in squad they may also got hight wickets like indian fast bowler and will safe his team from whitewash.
If you take the stats into account in ODI, Tim Southee never had a great performance against India in my memory and even if you check his economy against India is well over 6.15 but on the other hand Trent Boult does bowl well against India and even in a hypothetical situation with the form the Indian batsmen were in, i doubt they could have made any difference.
full member
Activity: 952
Merit: 105
I missed the last match Between India and New Zealand. Once again, Rohit Sharma and Shubman Gill gave India a Flying start. Both got Century, and they scored a massive 385. Devon Conway and Henry Nicholls played well, and they had enough overs in hand to win the match. Unfortunately, they could not score it while Kuldeep Yadav and Shardul Thakur restricted them to 295 runs. Congratulations, team India.
The main reason for India's outstanding performance is that each of their batsmen is in good form. So they are not dependent on the performance of any particular batsman in the match. Every batsman in the team is able to play well. As a result, India are able to set big score targets very easily. On the other hand, the bowlers can help the batsmen very well.
India are always known for his strong batting lineup they always produce dozen of potential batter, it's true that in recent time most of indian player are in really good form as compared to previous year where they failed in every competition. But now the best news for them are that his captain Rohit Sharma (hitman) which are out of form for a long period of time come in form recently also king Kohli too. Every single player like S.Gill , Siraj, l.kishan , U.Malik, Shami and many more give Thier best to fulfill the team needs at perfect time.
That's true India have always been known for world best batting lineup and they always had best batsman but receny the thing that made up unbeatable Is their bowling that wasittle weak before . But now their balling is outstanding and is giving tough time to strong teams like Newzealand. 
Australia should come prepared for indias balling attack.
hero member
Activity: 1484
Merit: 699
I missed the last match Between India and New Zealand. Once again, Rohit Sharma and Shubman Gill gave India a Flying start. Both got Century, and they scored a massive 385. Devon Conway and Henry Nicholls played well, and they had enough overs in hand to win the match. Unfortunately, they could not score it while Kuldeep Yadav and Shardul Thakur restricted them to 295 runs. Congratulations, team India.
The main reason for India's outstanding performance is that each of their batsmen is in good form. So they are not dependent on the performance of any particular batsman in the match. Every batsman in the team is able to play well. As a result, India are able to set big score targets very easily. On the other hand, the bowlers can help the batsmen very well.
India are always known for his strong batting lineup they always produce dozen of potential batter, it's true that in recent time most of indian player are in really good form as compared to previous year where they failed in every competition. But now the best news for them are that his captain Rohit Sharma (hitman) which are out of form for a long period of time come in form recently also king Kohli too. Every single player like S.Gill , Siraj, l.kishan , U.Malik, Shami and many more give Thier best to fulfill the team needs at perfect time.
full member
Activity: 952
Merit: 108
1xBit recovered their reputation
~
Yeh absolutely some of his crutial player are missing the big series against India, the player like Kane Williamson, Glenn Phillips, Trent Boult, Tim Southee, Ish Sodhi and many more who can contribute with team performance in order to prevent his team whitewash defeat against India in this ODI series. I don't want to say that India beat the team whose key player are missing but just I want to say that if these player were available for this series then it will be nail biting match and may be the result will be different.
New Zealand missed Kane Williamson without a doubt but do you really think that Trent Boult and Tim Southee could make a difference in Indian conditions. The first match was really interesting as Michael Bracewell took the team from an impossible situation to a near victory but then the rest were clearly one sided encounters.
No doubt Michael Bracewell do some sensational performance he play some brutal inning against indian bowler but unfortunately didn't help his team to win, while the absence of Kane Williamson really affect their batting strength because his recent performance against Pakistan show us how can he will be really helpful for his team in the series against India , while in this series most of good performance were shown by indian fast bowler compare to spinner so if Tim Southee and Trent Boult were included in squad they may also got hight wickets like indian fast bowler and will safe his team from whitewash.
New Zealand might have been stronger if Tim Southee and Trent Boult were in the team. It was the credit of the Indian batsmen and bowlers. Because of their performance, a top class team New Zealand has been whitewashed. Only two batsmen scored good runs but almost everyone except Hardik Pandya scored low. If the top order four batsman can complete the game then I think India will definitely win most of the match. New Zealand had a good start but failed at the end. Michael Bracewell could not give anything good for the team in the last match of ODI series.

We have to accept that Indian players have played very well in this series. Due to the excellent performance of the Indian batsmen in the first match, India set a target of more than 350. And in the second match itself, New Zealand's batting disaster was witnessed due to the outstanding performance of the Indian bowlers. And in the last match as well, the two Indian openers had a partnership of over 200. It is because of the excellent performance of the bowlers and batsmen that they have been able to whitewash a team like New Zealand.
hero member
Activity: 2128
Merit: 658
Leading Crypto Sports Betting & Casino Platform
~
Yeh absolutely some of his crutial player are missing the big series against India, the player like Kane Williamson, Glenn Phillips, Trent Boult, Tim Southee, Ish Sodhi and many more who can contribute with team performance in order to prevent his team whitewash defeat against India in this ODI series. I don't want to say that India beat the team whose key player are missing but just I want to say that if these player were available for this series then it will be nail biting match and may be the result will be different.
New Zealand missed Kane Williamson without a doubt but do you really think that Trent Boult and Tim Southee could make a difference in Indian conditions. The first match was really interesting as Michael Bracewell took the team from an impossible situation to a near victory but then the rest were clearly one sided encounters.
No doubt Michael Bracewell do some sensational performance he play some brutal inning against indian bowler but unfortunately didn't help his team to win, while the absence of Kane Williamson really affect their batting strength because his recent performance against Pakistan show us how can he will be really helpful for his team in the series against India , while in this series most of good performance were shown by indian fast bowler compare to spinner so if Tim Southee and Trent Boult were included in squad they may also got hight wickets like indian fast bowler and will safe his team from whitewash.
New Zealand might have been stronger if Tim Southee and Trent Boult were in the team. It was the credit of the Indian batsmen and bowlers. Because of their performance, a top class team New Zealand has been whitewashed. Only two batsmen scored good runs but almost everyone except Hardik Pandya scored low. If the top order four batsman can complete the game then I think India will definitely win most of the match. New Zealand had a good start but failed at the end. Michael Bracewell could not give anything good for the team in the last match of ODI series.
legendary
Activity: 2184
Merit: 1540
The main reason for India's outstanding performance is that each of their batsmen is in good form. So they are not dependent on the performance of any particular batsman in the match. Every batsman in the team is able to play well. As a result, India are able to set big score targets very easily. On the other hand, the bowlers can help the batsmen very well. But I would say as the batsmen are providing big score targets, that is why India is not facing problems even if the bowlers are performing a bit poorly. Indian bowling still looks average to me.
I would argue that sometimes it could backfire badly. Considering WC trophy is on focus.

In context, when all your star batters peak at the same time, and that too when the main event is almost 9 months away.

There is a concept when you peak as a team. Some peak before and very few reach their best level when the main event is around the corner, that's what worries me as an ICT fan.
full member
Activity: 1302
Merit: 129
Vaccinized.. immunity level is full.
I missed the last match Between India and New Zealand. Once again, Rohit Sharma and Shubman Gill gave India a Flying start. Both got Century, and they scored a massive 385. Devon Conway and Henry Nicholls played well, and they had enough overs in hand to win the match. Unfortunately, they could not score it while Kuldeep Yadav and Shardul Thakur restricted them to 295 runs. Congratulations, team India.

The main reason for India's outstanding performance is that each of their batsmen is in good form. So they are not dependent on the performance of any particular batsman in the match. Every batsman in the team is able to play well. As a result, India are able to set big score targets very easily. On the other hand, the bowlers can help the batsmen very well. But I would say as the batsmen are providing big score targets, that is why India is not facing problems even if the bowlers are performing a bit poorly. Indian bowling still looks average to me.
hero member
Activity: 1484
Merit: 699
~
Yeh absolutely some of his crutial player are missing the big series against India, the player like Kane Williamson, Glenn Phillips, Trent Boult, Tim Southee, Ish Sodhi and many more who can contribute with team performance in order to prevent his team whitewash defeat against India in this ODI series. I don't want to say that India beat the team whose key player are missing but just I want to say that if these player were available for this series then it will be nail biting match and may be the result will be different.
New Zealand missed Kane Williamson without a doubt but do you really think that Trent Boult and Tim Southee could make a difference in Indian conditions. The first match was really interesting as Michael Bracewell took the team from an impossible situation to a near victory but then the rest were clearly one sided encounters.
No doubt Michael Bracewell do some sensational performance he play some brutal inning against indian bowler but unfortunately didn't help his team to win, while the absence of Kane Williamson really affect their batting strength because his recent performance against Pakistan show us how can he will be really helpful for his team in the series against India , while in this series most of good performance were shown by indian fast bowler compare to spinner so if Tim Southee and Trent Boult were included in squad they may also got hight wickets like indian fast bowler and will safe his team from whitewash.
hero member
Activity: 2156
Merit: 803
Top Crypto Casino
I missed the last match Between India and New Zealand. Once again, Rohit Sharma and Shubman Gill gave India a Flying start. Both got Century, and they scored a massive 385. Devon Conway and Henry Nicholls played well, and they had enough overs in hand to win the match. Unfortunately, they could not score it while Kuldeep Yadav and Shardul Thakur restricted them to 295 runs. Congratulations, team India.
Its good that you missed the last match as at the moment it seems all matches played by India on their homeground in 2023 are being completely dominated/ controlled by India. As such matches after sometime turns out to be a waste of time as you crib for the exitment and close finish. I am very disappointed by the Kiwis side as they have not been able to give a stiff competition to the Indian side, except the first ODI. I am hoping they won't perform in the same manner in the upcoming T20 series starting tomorrow.
hero member
Activity: 518
Merit: 547
I missed the last match Between India and New Zealand. Once again, Rohit Sharma and Shubman Gill gave India a Flying start. Both got Century, and they scored a massive 385. Devon Conway and Henry Nicholls played well, and they had enough overs in hand to win the match. Unfortunately, they could not score it while Kuldeep Yadav and Shardul Thakur restricted them to 295 runs. Congratulations, team India.
hero member
Activity: 2268
Merit: 579
DGbet.fun - Crypto Sportsbook
For the T20 ranking, India is only slightly ahead of England (267 vs 266). The same case in ODI ranking as well. The top-4 teams are very close. India at 114, England- 113, Australia- 112 and New Zealand at 111. This means that a single bilateral series can cause a quick reshuffling of the table. For India, the next ODI series is against Australia on 17th March (at Wankhede Stadium, Mumbai). If India wins the ODI series, then they will stay at top. On the other hand a good performance from Australia will see them going up in the ranking table.

This will also be an important series to follow. Because we would also be able to see the strengths and weaknesses of both teams going into the world cup. I honestly believe that India might actually be able to win this series as well. Because first of all this is going to be played in India and secondly the type of performance that India is showing right now, it is expected India to win. And from the looks of it, I think the ODI world cup is going to be batting-sided. Because India is being able to score a lot of runs in these series.
legendary
Activity: 2366
Merit: 1023
DGbet.fun - Crypto Sportsbook
And winning an international series is still an achievement in my opinion. For the smaller countries at least. But for India, I guess not so much.
A new generation of ICT fans are used to seeing their team win in almost every bilateral series (ODI and T-20). Yes it's a good feeling but it doesn't matter much, same sentiments could be found in Aus +Eng, there is a reason for that.   

In the T-20 WC season, all top teams field their second-string teams in the bilateral ODI format (that's where we see experiments and new players). The same practice comes into play when ODI WC is scheduled. India fielded a full-strength batting lineup in the ODI series but in T-20 series against Kiwis, we'll see a different squad.

Talking about only LOIs, not Red Ball cricket.

First of all, the top four teams are very close in terms of points. Anyone of them can get ahead of the other by winning a bilateral series in my opinion. So the teams are of course interested in winning the series. But this year obviously every team is going to give much more importance to the world cup. So I also agree that even though India is playing the main 11 and seeing if they have any problems in the ODI format, the t20 format might actually be a little different.
hero member
Activity: 1680
Merit: 505
For the T20 ranking, India is only slightly ahead of England (267 vs 266). The same case in ODI ranking as well. The top-4 teams are very close. India at 114, England- 113, Australia- 112 and New Zealand at 111. This means that a single bilateral series can cause a quick reshuffling of the table. For India, the next ODI series is against Australia on 17th March (at Wankhede Stadium, Mumbai). If India wins the ODI series, then they will stay at top. On the other hand a good performance from Australia will see them going up in the ranking table.
India has shown brilliant performances in recent series against sirlanka and Newzealand , that's why they are leading the points table.  Australia on other hand is also very string team , series between Australia and India is going to be an interesting and competitive one and that's going to decide who'll lead the icc top ranking .
legendary
Activity: 3346
Merit: 1352
Leading Crypto Sports Betting & Casino Platform
For the T20 ranking, India is only slightly ahead of England (267 vs 266). The same case in ODI ranking as well. The top-4 teams are very close. India at 114, England- 113, Australia- 112 and New Zealand at 111. This means that a single bilateral series can cause a quick reshuffling of the table. For India, the next ODI series is against Australia on 17th March (at Wankhede Stadium, Mumbai). If India wins the ODI series, then they will stay at top. On the other hand a good performance from Australia will see them going up in the ranking table.
hero member
Activity: 2128
Merit: 658
Leading Crypto Sports Betting & Casino Platform
New Zealand cricket team came into bat in the second innings chasing a target of 386 runs set by India, and so far have collected 210 runs for the loss of 5 wickets in 28.4 overs. In today's match, New Zealand cricket team is in fairly good form in batting. The game looks like if the New Zealand cricket team can play the whole match then there may be a chance for New Zealand to win against India. Until the end of the game, let's see how much responsibility the New Zealand cricket team finishes the game
New Zealand's 295 runs is truly commendable. Although New Zealand lost against India, it is admirable that they scored a huge run against India today.  If they could have saved their wickets, they could have scored more runs as they played 41.2 overs and failed to play the remaining 8.4 overs due to loss of wickets.  But how long they  played  they managed to collect good runs
New Zealand won the toss and decided to bowling against India. And this decision is bad for New Zealand. India's two openers, Rohit Sharma and Shubman Grill, both scored centuries and scored a total of 212 runs. Rohit scored 101 runs off 85 balls and Shubman Gill scored 112 runs off 78 balls. Virat Kohli scored 36 runs off 26 balls, Hardik Pandya scored 54 runs off 38 balls and Shardul Thakur scored 25 runs off 17 balls to take India's total to 385 runs. In reply, New Zealand put in to bat and collected a total of 295 runs. If New Zealand could have played 50 overs, they would have been expected to win. But they were 41.2 all out. India won by 90 runs against New Zealand.
New Zealand try to maintain their runs in every overs even after New Zealand's losing their wickets. This strategy was not very effective for ODI matches but there was no other way to ignore because of high chasing target. India managed to score 385 in the match after getting a century in the opening batting. New Zealand managed to form a big partnership by losing two wickets but after taking their two wickets it didn't take more time to get the next wickets. Due to which New Zealand had to end the ODI series by whitewash. There is another T20 series and what will be their condition is now a matter of concern for many.
At least New Zealand won't win the match against India.  India is now the king of the cricket game.  India is very good in both batting and bowling.  So New Zealand scored 295 runs against India, it was a great game for them. I was surprised by New Zealand's performance in this 3rd match as I did not expect 295 runs from them.  I expected a maximum of 200 runs
Australia is still the king of cricket but India is next. According to the research of www.icc-cricket.com Australia is still ranked 1st and India is 2nd and on the other hand New Zealand is 5th.  That is why India has been able to show such a good performance.
check here - https://www.icc-cricket.com/rankings/mens/team-rankings/test
Australia is ranked 1st in Tests but 3rd in ODIs. India is ranked 1st in ODI matches. Australia and England are good teams that's right but now India is also a good team like them and India is doing very well in ODIs now and looking at their performance it looks like they will do well in other matches as well and they are even stronger than before.
At the moment, India is at the top of the ICC rankings in two formats. They are ranked number 1 in ODI and T20 formats. They are in 2nd position in Test format. On the other hand, Australia is now ranked 6th in T20 and 3rd in ODI format. They have retained the first place in the Test. However, this ranking will not play much role in the performance of the team, especially in the case of Australia. Australia played only 32 ODIs while India played 44. Comparatively, Australia is still in a good position. But there is no option for denying that India has been the best in recent times.
hero member
Activity: 1484
Merit: 608
Vave.com - Crypto Casino
New Zealand cricket team came into bat in the second innings chasing a target of 386 runs set by India, and so far have collected 210 runs for the loss of 5 wickets in 28.4 overs. In today's match, New Zealand cricket team is in fairly good form in batting. The game looks like if the New Zealand cricket team can play the whole match then there may be a chance for New Zealand to win against India. Until the end of the game, let's see how much responsibility the New Zealand cricket team finishes the game
New Zealand's 295 runs is truly commendable. Although New Zealand lost against India, it is admirable that they scored a huge run against India today.  If they could have saved their wickets, they could have scored more runs as they played 41.2 overs and failed to play the remaining 8.4 overs due to loss of wickets.  But how long they  played  they managed to collect good runs
New Zealand won the toss and decided to bowling against India. And this decision is bad for New Zealand. India's two openers, Rohit Sharma and Shubman Grill, both scored centuries and scored a total of 212 runs. Rohit scored 101 runs off 85 balls and Shubman Gill scored 112 runs off 78 balls. Virat Kohli scored 36 runs off 26 balls, Hardik Pandya scored 54 runs off 38 balls and Shardul Thakur scored 25 runs off 17 balls to take India's total to 385 runs. In reply, New Zealand put in to bat and collected a total of 295 runs. If New Zealand could have played 50 overs, they would have been expected to win. But they were 41.2 all out. India won by 90 runs against New Zealand.
New Zealand try to maintain their runs in every overs even after New Zealand's losing their wickets. This strategy was not very effective for ODI matches but there was no other way to ignore because of high chasing target. India managed to score 385 in the match after getting a century in the opening batting. New Zealand managed to form a big partnership by losing two wickets but after taking their two wickets it didn't take more time to get the next wickets. Due to which New Zealand had to end the ODI series by whitewash. There is another T20 series and what will be their condition is now a matter of concern for many.
At least New Zealand won't win the match against India.  India is now the king of the cricket game.  India is very good in both batting and bowling.  So New Zealand scored 295 runs against India, it was a great game for them. I was surprised by New Zealand's performance in this 3rd match as I did not expect 295 runs from them.  I expected a maximum of 200 runs
Australia is still the king of cricket but India is next. According to the research of www.icc-cricket.com Australia is still ranked 1st and India is 2nd and on the other hand New Zealand is 5th.  That is why India has been able to show such a good performance.
check here - https://www.icc-cricket.com/rankings/mens/team-rankings/test
Australia is ranked 1st in Tests but 3rd in ODIs. India is ranked 1st in ODI matches. Australia and England are good teams that's right but now India is also a good team like them and India is doing very well in ODIs now and looking at their performance it looks like they will do well in other matches as well and they are even stronger than before.
legendary
Activity: 3346
Merit: 1352
Leading Crypto Sports Betting & Casino Platform
Glen Phillips was in the team, New Zealand missed Kane Williamson without a doubt but do you really think that Trent Boult and Tim Southee could make a difference in Indian conditions. The first match was really interesting as Michael Bracewell took the team from an impossible situation to a near victory but then the rest were clearly one sided encounters.

The absence of Kane Williamson, Trent Boult and Tim Southee had a big negative impact for New Zealand without any doubt. Williamson is their best batsman, and Boult and Southee are their top two bowlers. So essentially the Kiwis were without their top-3 players. Imagine the Indian team playing without Hardick, SKY and Kohli. And more importantly, these three had experience in playing under such conditions. Boult and Southee have represented various franchises in IPL and therefore more suited to the Indian conditions compared to inexperienced pacers such as Duffy and Shipley.
hero member
Activity: 2814
Merit: 911
Have Fun )@@( Stay Safe
~
Yeh absolutely some of his crutial player are missing the big series against India, the player like Kane Williamson, Glenn Phillips, Trent Boult, Tim Southee, Ish Sodhi and many more who can contribute with team performance in order to prevent his team whitewash defeat against India in this ODI series. I don't want to say that India beat the team whose key player are missing but just I want to say that if these player were available for this series then it will be nail biting match and may be the result will be different.
Glen Phillips was in the team, New Zealand missed Kane Williamson without a doubt but do you really think that Trent Boult and Tim Southee could make a difference in Indian conditions. The first match was really interesting as Michael Bracewell took the team from an impossible situation to a near victory but then the rest were clearly one sided encounters.
hero member
Activity: 1484
Merit: 699
People  were expecting much more from Newzealand than this , they were clean sweeped by Indians with their amazing batting side and balling side.
India has shown some marvellous performances and proved the world that they are the king of cricket and no one can beat them. With this determination and hard work the world up will be theirs for sure.
New Zealand has some mismanagements issues in its team which should be resolved otherwise this will not ve good for them in the ICC world cup.
Yeh absolutely some of his crutial player are missing the big series against India, the player like Kane Williamson, Glenn Phillips, Trent Boult, Tim Southee, Ish Sodhi and many more who can contribute with team performance in order to prevent his team whitewash defeat against India in this ODI series. I don't want to say that India beat the team whose key player are missing but just I want to say that if these player were available for this series then it will be nail biting match and may be the result will be different.
Jump to: