It sounded funny to my ears lol
Having a plan is not enough in the real world, you have to do some work too. His tenure had everything but that "Work". He could've done something if he wasn't busy settling a score with the players, leaking news, and doing advertisements all the time.
I was a big fan of dada during the 90s and early 2000s. Maybe because of that I would rather blame Kohli and Shah at this point. His relationship with Kohli was not good. But then, his questions were quite valid. Why was Kohli given a free run, despite such an extended period of bad form? And the management even persisted with him as the captain, despite his repeated blunders. Ganguly was someone who had the courage to question this. And he was made a scapegoat exactly because of his courageous behavior.
While i agree Virat had many problems but still i have a different take on this matter.
At the start i don't think he had the courage to face Virat despite having more power only because Virat was doing so well in Test cricket, yes they failed in ICC tournaments but no one can deny that the Indian test team were ruthless in red-ball cricket and witnessed new heights, it was all Kohli be it his aggressive approach or building a new crop of pace battery.
IMO both of these giants took things into their egos. Virat felt entitled that he can choose whatever he want, that was his biggest mistake as BCCI had a policy of 1 captain for all 3 formats or if not then 2 captains ( 1 for white ball and 1 for Red ball) Virat miscalculated this and messed thing up.
On the other hand, there was a big conversation gap between BCCI officials (Ganguly) and Skipper (Virat). It was BCCI's job to handle such incidents with proper channels and not leak news to the media from some anonymous source. Also some pathetic interviews from both sides, it made the situation worse.
Both parties were in fault but IMO it was Dada's job to keep everything in check as he was in top position, in which he failed miserably.