How about you keep it to facts rather than your sole opinions?
Wise words... Follow them, don't just preach them.
I don't ignore the risk involved, I embrace it. It has paid me well. (And still pays me. Enough to share and spread the wealth, I might also add.)
As for your stupidity about changing the programs... If it comes to that, you have a choice to use it, or not. If it would hurt you, you wouldn't use it, thus, it would not be embraced.
As for the other coins... They have not shown anything that indicates they are not acting similar to bitcoins. There is your usual pump-n-dumps, but that happens on anything with value. If they didn't rise and fall, they would not be worth investing in. Like a dollar, which simply falls constantly... but it falls steadily... the more the banks and govt takes.
Pick any point in time, one year from any other point in time, on BTC, and tell me what the return has been. Now remove tons of "lost coins" from circulation, and apply standard logic of linear growth. Tell me what those values would return in the future. (Also, compare those numbers to "buying hardware" and "hardware returns".)
I said the value lies in the network, idiot. Someone didn't read. Value, still for the most part, is still greatly dependent on losses of the network. The supply is greater than demand, at the moment, and that is slowly changing. Thus, it will easily hit $150,000 and more, per BTC. The only question is when it will hit that low value. Doesn't matter to me. I assume all my investment is a loss, a contribution to the network, so anything I get is a reward. (So-far, the reward has been a persistent 10x+ per year, for me. That is 1000% growth.)
Not that I like DogeCoin... (horrible coin), but it is making a lot of people money. That is too much risk for me to bite-off, chew and swallow. I stick with more predictable earnings, where the risk is lower and the gains would seem to be less, but in the end, are always more for me.
General rule of thumb... If everyone believes it will go up, it is guaranteed to go down. If it did what the majority wanted, there would be no winners, because there would be no losers. Someone has to lose, or hold-on longer, for making the wrong choices, or bailing-out early, or settling for less. People always settle for less, on the majority.
But all this is off topic.
They are delivering. End of story. Buy more, or settle with the ones you have coming, when they arrive. They don't have to mine the coins with your machines. You are already paying them 1,000x what the machine costs to produce. If they mine, they would just get less money, not more. Same rule... Buying is cheaper than mining... Why would they mine the coins when it is cheaper just to buy them, and not have to waste money on power, storage-space, maintenance, and replacement parts? They wouldn't.
It's like a bank... Banks don't want your money... they have plenty of that. They want to loan you money that you can't pay back, so they can obtain your assets. Then they end-up with your money and your assets, and you are left with nothing. The money is irrelevant, because they can just print more.