OFFICIAL CGMINER mining software thread for linux/win/osx/mips/arm/r-pi 4.11.0 - page 528.

420

hero member

Activity: 756

Merit: 500

Quote from: rav3n_pl on August 04, 2012, 06:42:30 AM

Quote from: os2sam on August 03, 2012, 10:24:36 AM

Quote from: Vbs on August 03, 2012, 08:55:23 AM

Quote from: rav3n_pl on August 03, 2012, 08:33:06 AM

oops, looks like something eat me one core and miner not have enough priority.
It works same now

Sorry!

It (miner) is not very cpu hungry (taking about 1-2%), but better to rise it priority to "above normal".

I always run cgminer at "realtime" priority! Grin

Really? Does that make a difference in hash rate?
Sam

Yes, it is.
Try run few cpu (not GPU) consuming programs and see difference

Unable to set priority to realtime, set priority to High instead

EDIT: Until I opened task manager as Admin

rav3n_pl

legendary

Activity: 1361

Merit: 1003

Don`t panic! Organize!

Quote from: os2sam on August 03, 2012, 10:24:36 AM

Quote from: Vbs on August 03, 2012, 08:55:23 AM

Quote from: rav3n_pl on August 03, 2012, 08:33:06 AM

oops, looks like something eat me one core and miner not have enough priority.
It works same now

Sorry!

It (miner) is not very cpu hungry (taking about 1-2%), but better to rise it priority to "above normal".

I always run cgminer at "realtime" priority! Grin

Really? Does that make a difference in hash rate?
Sam

Yes, it is.
Try run few cpu (not GPU) consuming programs and see difference

dave3

sr. member

Activity: 344

Merit: 250

Quote from: -ck on August 03, 2012, 10:43:29 PM

That's great. It means there was perhaps a single throttling incident and the code changes I made allowed it to recover fairly quickly.

Very good. It's still running fine.

420

hero member

Activity: 756

Merit: 500

Using integrated graphics, i found I can mine with CGMiner and newest radeon driver

However [replace with But here if you like But's]

It doesn't apply my overclock settings and gives me this message on startup, wondering how I would code to fix it if possible:

"ADL found less devices than opencl!
There is possibly more than one display attached to a GPU
Use the gpu map featured to reliably map OpenCL to ADL"
Hardware monitoring may NOT match up with devices!

Doesn't show temperature of my cards which is a real problem and makes me have to rely on other overclock software

-ck

legendary

Activity: 4088

Merit: 1631

Ruu \o/

Tittiez

hero member

Activity: 686

Merit: 500

Thought this might interest someone: setting intensity on the 6850 to, say, 3-8 make no more then a .5MH/s difference. So anyone using a 6850 for a display card and mining at the same time intensity 3 is great. 250Mh/s Cheesy

dave3

sr. member

Activity: 344

Merit: 250

I've been running 2.6.2 for awhile now, and ran into the BFL error again, but it seemed to recover faster than with 2.6.1-9.

Code:

 cgminer version 2.6.2 - Started: [2012-08-03 11:01:01]
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
 (5s):1742.8 (avg):1607.1 Mh/s | Q:1338  A:18444  R:118  HW:0  E:1378%  U:22.2/m
 TQ: 4  ST: 2  SS: 10  DW: 151  NB: 111  LW: 18514  GF: 106  RF: 23
 Connected to http://us2.eclipsemc.com:8337 with LP as user ---
 Block: 000000fef54454de78f71d88e1682ac1...  Started: [00:50:34]
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
 [P]ool management [S]ettings [D]isplay options [Q]uit
 BFL 0:  56.8C         | 764.5/803.5Mh/s | A:9223 R:54 HW:0 U:11.11/m
 BFL 1:  59.3C         | 795.5/803.6Mh/s | A:9224 R:64 HW:0 U:11.11/m
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

 [2012-08-04 00:49:49] Accepted 642b0a10.439f01a5 BFL 1 pool 0
 [2012-08-04 00:49:49] Accepted 99bc51ae.af7b0fb2 BFL 0 pool 0
 [2012-08-04 00:49:55] Accepted c1141456.8d3bc2e8 BFL 1 pool 0
 [2012-08-04 00:49:55] Accepted af80a22c.8ede0eb0 BFL 0 pool 0
 [2012-08-04 00:50:00] Accepted 2051832a.8ec1030b BFL 1 pool 0
 [2012-08-04 00:50:11] Accepted 2348c318.bfdc7136 BFL 1 pool 0
 [2012-08-04 00:50:21] Accepted 1437218f.aa9cdb6a BFL 1 pool 0
 [2012-08-04 00:50:21] BFL0: Error: Get temp returned empty string/timed out
 [2012-08-04 00:50:26] BFL0: Error: Get result reports: Temperature (celcius): 57.8
 [2012-08-04 00:50:26] Accepted 099e869b.522a22ef BFL 1 pool 0
 [2012-08-04 00:50:26] Accepted cad1b030.cb2821a3 BFL 1 pool 0
 [2012-08-04 00:50:32] Accepted 208e9cf7.a2ce42d5 BFL 0 pool 0
 [2012-08-04 00:50:32] Accepted 95a0b59c.aa2bef25 BFL 1 pool 0
 [2012-08-04 00:50:34] LONGPOLL from pool 0 detected new block
 [2012-08-04 00:50:34] Pool 0 not providing work fast enough
 [2012-08-04 00:50:41] Accepted a65f79cb.fd521ce9 BFL 1 pool 0
 [2012-08-04 00:50:41] Accepted e3598f3f.79c13014 BFL 1 pool 0

os2sam

legendary

Activity: 3583

Merit: 1094

Think for yourself

Quote from: Vbs on August 03, 2012, 08:55:23 AM

Quote from: rav3n_pl on August 03, 2012, 08:33:06 AM

oops, looks like something eat me one core and miner not have enough priority.
It works same now

Sorry!

It (miner) is not very cpu hungry (taking about 1-2%), but better to rise it priority to "above normal".

I always run cgminer at "realtime" priority! Grin

Really? Does that make a difference in hash rate?
Sam

Vbs

hero member

Activity: 504

Merit: 500

Quote from: rav3n_pl on August 03, 2012, 08:33:06 AM

oops, looks like something eat me one core and miner not have enough priority.
It works same now

Sorry!

It (miner) is not very cpu hungry (taking about 1-2%), but better to rise it priority to "above normal".

I always run cgminer at "realtime" priority! Grin

rav3n_pl

legendary

Activity: 1361

Merit: 1003

Don`t panic! Organize!

oops, looks like something eat me one core and miner not have enough priority.
It works same now

Sorry!

It (miner) is not very cpu hungry (taking about 1-2%), but better to rise it priority to "above normal".

-ck

legendary

Activity: 4088

Merit: 1631

Ruu \o/

Quote from: rav3n_pl on August 03, 2012, 08:23:34 AM

2.6.1 vs 2.6.2 on same settings:
.1 = ~150MH
.2 = ~100MH
copied config file and running from same command line options.
Win7 64
Rolling back to 2.6.1 for now, something is changed in intesity?

Nope, nothing changed in that code.

rav3n_pl

legendary

Activity: 1361

Merit: 1003

Don`t panic! Organize!

2.6.1 vs 2.6.2 on same settings:
.1 = ~150MH
.2 = ~100MH
copied config file and running from same command line options.
Win7 64
Rolling back to 2.6.1 for now, something is changed in intesity?

sharky112065

sr. member

Activity: 383

Merit: 250

Quote from: BlackPrapor on August 03, 2012, 02:47:22 AM

Quote from: kano on August 03, 2012, 02:31:05 AM

Quote from: rampone on August 03, 2012, 02:25:03 AM

somethings wrong with 2.6.2 and bfls, feels like they run slower somehow, im off to 2.6.1 again

What did you feel that with ...

I believe that place is called buttocks Grin

Thank you; made me laugh. Grin

420

hero member

Activity: 756

Merit: 500

I'm assuming the version, 2.3.1, 2.6.1, 2.6.2 has no bearing on hashrate for my 5000 series (3x5970's)

thats' what it seems through my limited testing of just opening, watching the hash sort of stabilize within 10 minutes

but jumps up and down sometimes, 1900->2000, to 2122. 100mhash jumps, now just 1995 to 222 then to 2063, 1800, 1750, not switching pools or anything
not running anything else on this PC, not using dynamic clock change, only fan change to desired temperature

BlackPrapor

hero member

Activity: 628

Merit: 504

Quote from: kano on August 03, 2012, 02:31:05 AM

Quote from: rampone on August 03, 2012, 02:25:03 AM

somethings wrong with 2.6.2 and bfls, feels like they run slower somehow, im off to 2.6.1 again

What did you feel that with ...

I believe that place is called buttocks Grin

kano

legendary

Activity: 4592

Merit: 1851

Linux since 1997 RedHat 4

Quote from: rampone on August 03, 2012, 02:25:03 AM

somethings wrong with 2.6.2 and bfls, feels like they run slower somehow, im off to 2.6.1 again

What did you feel that with ...

rampone

sr. member

Activity: 339

Merit: 250

dafq is goin on

somethings wrong with 2.6.2 and bfls, feels like they run slower somehow, im off to 2.6.1 again

420

hero member

Activity: 756

Merit: 500

Quote from: Vorksholk on August 03, 2012, 01:37:20 AM

Quote from: 420 on August 03, 2012, 01:17:50 AM

What does the intensity flag mean

is lower more intense? higher more intense? doesn't seem right as 8, 9 seem more mhash, lower or higher intensity gave me lower mhash

Higher intensity means higher hash rate in general. Intensity is basically how aggressive the miner is on the card.

im getting driver crash at only 750mhz 1.085 v, 725/1.05v is the stock 5970

Vorksholk

legendary

Activity: 1713

Merit: 1029

Quote from: 420 on August 03, 2012, 01:17:50 AM

What does the intensity flag mean

is lower more intense? higher more intense? doesn't seem right as 8, 9 seem more mhash, lower or higher intensity gave me lower mhash

Higher intensity means higher hash rate in general. Intensity is basically how aggressive the miner is on the card.

420

hero member

Activity: 756

Merit: 500

What does the intensity flag mean

is lower more intense? higher more intense? doesn't seem right as 8, 9 seem more mhash, lower or higher intensity gave me lower mhash

Topic: OFFICIAL CGMINER mining software thread for linux/win/osx/mips/arm/r-pi 4.11.0 - page 528. (Read 5805546 times)