OLD: BFGMiner 3.10.0: modular ASIC+FPGA, GBT+Strtm, RPC, Mac/Lnx/W64, AntU1, DRB - page 76.

Luke-Jr

legendary

Activity: 2576

Merit: 1186

Quote from: joeventura on December 24, 2013, 05:33:59 PM

Just upgraded to 3.8.1 so my new Chili boards would work. Which it fixed perfectly!

commandline with -g -s all no longer works, and as soon as I remove those then the block erupters stop working.

How can I get BFL devices, Chilis and Block Erupter USBs to all work at the same time?

Spelling -S in the right case (uppercase) would help.
There is no -g option.

Taugeran

hero member

Activity: 658

Merit: 500

CCNA: There i fixed the internet.

Quote from: joeventura on December 24, 2013, 05:33:59 PM

Just upgraded to 3.8.1 so my new Chili boards would work. Which it fixed perfectly!

commandline with -g -s all no longer works, and as soon as I remove those then the block erupters stop working.

How can I get BFL devices, Chilis and Block Erupter USBs to all work at the same time?

What is are you running on?

And are your chilies and bfls working. Just not the erupters

joeventura

hero member

Activity: 854

Merit: 500

Just upgraded to 3.8.1 so my new Chili boards would work. Which it fixed perfectly!

commandline with -g -s all no longer works, and as soon as I remove those then the block erupters stop working.

How can I get BFL devices, Chilis and Block Erupter USBs to all work at the same time?

Taugeran

hero member

Activity: 658

Merit: 500

CCNA: There i fixed the internet.

Quote from: Amph on December 24, 2013, 03:37:42 PM

in cgminer they were different, here they are the same?

Quote

i mean not the net difficulty, but the difficulty i need to surpass to find a block

Finding a block means your share meets or exceeds the network diff (currently 1.18B)

Finding a share just means find a valid solution that mets your pools diff

Quote

how to see my best share and my difficulty?

These can be seen in the top few lines of bfgminer
Your current pool diff is in :
Conected to XXX diff ### with stratum
Where ### is the share diff for your account

Best score is a line or two lower on the right

BS:###

Sorry for misleading coverall answer :/

Merry christmahanakwanzaka to all btw

Amph

legendary

Activity: 3248

Merit: 1070

in cgminer they were different, here they are the same?

Taugeran

hero member

Activity: 658

Merit: 500

CCNA: There i fixed the internet.

Quote from: Amph on December 24, 2013, 08:08:48 AM

ok it work now, hashrate a little below cgminer, but it's ok

how to see my best share and my difficulty? i mean not the net difficulty, but the difficulty i need to surpass to find a block

They are one and the same

Amph

legendary

Activity: 3248

Merit: 1070

ok it work now, hashrate a little below cgminer, but it's ok

how to see my best share and my difficulty? i mean not the net difficulty, but the difficulty i need to surpass to find a block

jedimstr

hero member

Activity: 798

Merit: 1000

Quote from: Amph on December 24, 2013, 06:37:26 AM

this miner last version, still support vga right?

how to start this miners with a gpu, i've tried in solo but the miner keep saying add devices, i have pressed m and the plus, but still nothing..

After you put in M and the plus, opencl:auto

Amph

legendary

Activity: 3248

Merit: 1070

this miner last version, still support vga right?

how to start this miners with a gpu, i've tried in solo but the miner keep saying add devices, i have pressed m and the plus, but still nothing..

HellDiverUK

hero member

Activity: 1246

Merit: 501

Quote from: Luke-Jr on December 23, 2013, 12:16:17 PM

Quote from: HellDiverUK on December 23, 2013, 12:13:15 PM

Now my Cube is working properly (new PSU fixed the issues I had), I can confirm that it hashes quicker through Slush's Proxy than it does through BFG's proxy.

Through BFG it never reports more than 30GH. Even after an hour it was still stuck at around 30GH. It's running a 37.5GH and still rising through Slush's proxy, and only been running through that for about 10 mins.

Both BFG and Slush's are running on the same machine (Celeron NUC running Windows 7 x86).

I'm curious if -q fixes this. Can you let me know?

Sorry, forgot to mention - I've got -q on both my instances of BFG (both OpenWRT and Windows).

There's no difference on the Windows machine (BFG is using less than 5% CPU while running proxy for 2 Blades, 1 Cube and 2 Jalapenos if -q is specified or not).

There IS a difference on the OpenWRT machine, it's much faster at proxying with -q specified, but still not as fast as the PC.

Longpoll support seems to be the only difference I see.

Luke-Jr

legendary

Activity: 2576

Merit: 1186

Quote from: HellDiverUK on December 23, 2013, 12:13:15 PM

Now my Cube is working properly (new PSU fixed the issues I had), I can confirm that it hashes quicker through Slush's Proxy than it does through BFG's proxy.

Through BFG it never reports more than 30GH. Even after an hour it was still stuck at around 30GH. It's running a 37.5GH and still rising through Slush's proxy, and only been running through that for about 10 mins.

Both BFG and Slush's are running on the same machine (Celeron NUC running Windows 7 x86).

I'm curious if -q fixes this. Can you let me know?

HellDiverUK

hero member

Activity: 1246

Merit: 501

Now my Cube is working properly (new PSU fixed the issues I had), I can confirm that it hashes quicker through Slush's Proxy than it does through BFG's proxy.

Through BFG it never reports more than 30GH. Even after an hour it was still stuck at around 30GH. It's running a 37.5GH and still rising through Slush's proxy, and only been running through that for about 10 mins.

Both BFG and Slush's are running on the same machine (Celeron NUC running Windows 7 x86).

dE_logics

hero member

Activity: 686

Merit: 500

bfgminer returns 100% hardware error on Linux doing CPU and/or GPU mining of scrypt based coins.

asjfdlksfd

full member

Activity: 128

Merit: 100

Hi,

is it hard to add the ZlX command output after the ZLX output in the Manage device section for the Chily? It gives the internal temperatures of every chip.
Edit:

PROCESSOR 0: 39.75 C
PROCESSOR 1: 35.75 C
PROCESSOR 2: 35.75 C
PROCESSOR 3: 36.25 C
PROCESSOR 4: 42.50 C
PROCESSOR 5: 42.00 C
PROCESSOR 6: 40.50 C
PROCESSOR 7: 41.25 C

Also I found that ZcX command adds the temperatures to the end of the line from each chip:

PROCESSOR 0: 9 engines @ 137 MHz -- MAP: E07E 27 C
PROCESSOR 1: 14 engines @ 198 MHz -- MAP: DFF7 26 C
PROCESSOR 2: 7 engines @ 188 MHz -- MAP: 0BF0 27 C
PROCESSOR 3: 15 engines @ 201 MHz -- MAP: FF7F 29 C
PROCESSOR 4: 13 engines @ 159 MHz -- MAP: E7FE 27 C
PROCESSOR 5: 8 engines @ 168 MHz -- MAP: 0FF0 27 C
PROCESSOR 6: 8 engines @ 179 MHz -- MAP: 0FF0 26 C
PROCESSOR 7: 15 engines @ 179 MHz -- MAP: F7FF 32 C

I think it must be modified in bitforce.c but I'm really novice in c coding Tongue

Cheers...

inaltoasinistra

full member

Activity: 142

Merit: 104

Quote from: Luke-Jr on December 21, 2013, 03:13:53 PM

Quote from: inaltoasinistra on December 21, 2013, 02:02:21 PM

I'm getting a lot of reject (30%) from eligius. I have a BFL SC 7GH/s, Arch Linux and bfgminer 3.8.1, What could be wrong? Thanks!

what kind of rejects?

R: X+Y

Y type. (Sorry, I don't know the meaning of the 2 numers :O) Now the situation is better

EDIT: not so much better: 15% D:

HellDiverUK

hero member

Activity: 1246

Merit: 501

Quote from: Luke-Jr on December 21, 2013, 05:48:26 PM

Previous Bitfountain (aka "ASICMiner") products did not support long polling, but it is certainly beneficial and perhaps worth adding to BFGMiner.

That would be great if you could - currently running the Cube through slush's proxy seems a little more efficient than through bfg's - but I'd rather use bfg.

Luke-Jr

legendary

Activity: 2576

Merit: 1186

Previous Bitfountain (aka "ASICMiner") products did not support long polling, but it is certainly beneficial and perhaps worth adding to BFGMiner.

Taugeran

hero member

Activity: 658

Merit: 500

CCNA: There i fixed the internet.

Quote from: HellDiverUK on December 21, 2013, 10:34:13 AM

I'm using an ASICMiner Cube. BFGMiner 3.8.1 32-bit on Windows and 3.8.1 on OpenWRT.

The Cube is reporting no Longpoll support when using BFG's getwork proxy, but does say Longpoll is active when using Slush's proxy.

Is Longpoll important?

Lp is used to gve updates on blocks for the getwork protocol aka new block on network.

It shouldn't make a difference since bfgminer is just man in the middle to a stratum/gbt pool or node and those protocols let bfgminer know of new blocks and all other data through a single comm channel

GW used more than 1 comm channel
Strtm/gbt use 1 comm channel

I don't believe bfgminer is presently coded to take upstream new blocks alerts and pass them down stream to proxies. No need really. The work bfgminer issues will always be current block as long as the pool is.

Slush maybe coded to do the above functionality?

@LJR care to correct any falsehoods in my logic?

Luke-Jr

legendary

Activity: 2576

Merit: 1186

Quote from: inaltoasinistra on December 21, 2013, 02:02:21 PM

I'm getting a lot of reject (30%) from eligius. I have a BFL SC 7GH/s, Arch Linux and bfgminer 3.8.1, What could be wrong? Thanks!

what kind of rejects?

inaltoasinistra

full member

Activity: 142

Merit: 104

I'm getting a lot of reject (30%) from eligius. I have a BFL SC 7GH/s, Arch Linux and bfgminer 3.8.1, What could be wrong? Thanks!

Topic: OLD: BFGMiner 3.10.0: modular ASIC+FPGA, GBT+Strtm, RPC, Mac/Lnx/W64, AntU1, DRB - page 76. (Read 1193358 times)