again in the same post you say one thing and debunk yourself a few sentences later
you say there are hundreds of core devs maintaining.. but there are actually only 5 maintainers
you say there are lots of doctors. yet you want to include the pharmacists who just fill prescriptions wrote by actual doctors. you also want to include translators. and comment grammar checkers.. to pretend their are more doctors maintaining
you then say and let me quote you
The fact that most Bitcoin developers conclude to Bitcoin Core developers' proposals, means Bitcoin Core devs are experienced and competent with writing and maintaining software. You have no evidence to argue they deceive the community, that is only a purely speculative conjecture. I do have. All these fruitful discussions, git commitments, and endless software reviews act as evidence to being experienced enough for the rest to follow.
Admit it. There is no Bitcoin developer outside Bitcoin Core who's being maintaining software, and is equally competent with Bitcoin terms and concepts.
"for the rest to follow"
thank you for now admitting that its bitcoin core thats maintaining bitcoin and no developer outside is treated as the same level as core devs
you are saying that all the pharmacists, grammar checkers and blind sheep that dont review the code but just CONCEPT ack(read comments and blind agree) trust the core doctors(only 5) maintaining bitcoin protocols because you believe that the core doctors have no evidence that they deceived the community and so everyone should just go with whatever core devs say.. blindly. by just conceptACK where any scrutiny or critique against core devs should be banned, ignored or treated as hostile.. rather than treated as keeping core devs accountable and responsible
ok heres some evidence of deceptions
a. the promise that taproot was made to allow for all taproot uses to produce a single signature length.. to be more leaner witness weight than other scripts/multisigs/other features that waste more space ..
and yet.. ordinals dead weight memes and other junk has proven otherwise due to taproots activation yep before taproot 1tx taking up 4mb of witness weight was a no no.. but with taproot thousands of transactions using taproot have proven the "single signature length" as a lie.. broken promise.. deception
b. that they were trying to SCALE BITCOIN. yet over the years guess what. all they have been doing is altering bitcoin to annoy people via fee wars and spam methods to make people stop using bitcoin as much where their solution is to use a different network
c. their initial "conservative" dont allow more data per block. due to scary stories about bitcoin is unfit for hard drives manufactured in 2005.. to now being "censorship resistance" of allowing bloat .. both deceptions aimed at annoying the community via broken promises and lies just to get people to move to other networks as the ultimate solution in their eyes
and with that yep even with their now "censorship resistance" they are coding more fee mania mechanisms to make transactions paying low fees get censored.
d. how they abused natural consensus which only reached 45% in their favour. to then use authoritarian practices to blackmail pools into blind following cores demands or face block rejections.. and then try to blame those actions on non core brands
e. core wrote the code. not mining pools and not asic machines or their owners. yet many times core devs and their fangirls have tried to blame "miners" for many things
theres alot more evidence. and yes it can be backed up by code and blockdata. unlike your scripts which are only backed up by comments of your idols that just tell you "wrong becasue franky" which is not even a defence its just a point finger in different direction
i do find it funny how ignorant you are about who wrote the code that let all this cludgy crap in. and then pretend they done nothing wrong and its not their responsibility to fix it.
can i just offer you some advice.
if after a few years now you are still penny pinching for scraps doing sig campaigns for income.. but still hoping your loyalty and obedience to some humans you want to describe as doctors/masters/gods/angels, hoping it will pay off sometime.. if they have not hired you already. they probably never will
and secondly.
when you show blind obedience to a dev instead of caring about the code and protocol and who should or shouldnt control it. try to care more about the code and less about the who.
EG care more about decentralised network with no central point of failure
after all when devs retire.. they will too get REKT and treated as outsiders once they leave the team. so whos ass will you then be kissing.
and one last thing. when you try to pretend there is no central point of failure but then wave the loyalty flag saying everyone should trust the central point.. you counter your own arguments. especially when you also then pretend there are hundreds of maintainers. yet you then highlight the hierarchy thus showing you do actually know it centers around the actual maintainers.
so stop playing games against yourself by arguing and count arguing and contradicting yourself
i know you dont want to admit that core devs caused the exploit that caused ordinal meme bloat crap and fee mania.. but they did open the exploit up.. and code and blockdata can prove it
if you cant trust the blockdata. then you have no clue of the basic principals of bitcoin..
oh wait you dont like blockdata.. as you have admitted in other posts