Pages:
Author

Topic: The Lightning Network FAQ (Read 33222 times)

legendary
Activity: 2898
Merit: 1823
September 16, 2024, 10:02:23 AM

Surprise, surprise...Kraken exchange  drops Lightning Network in Germany due to compliance reasons.
I am sure all Lightning wallets will be next on the list, probably Phoenix wallet is the first to go.
Lightning is the fUtuRe, adopti0n c0ntinues  Tongue
https://stacker.news/items/681879


The layer of privacy like what "anon" mentioned is probably the actual reason, no? Cool

If that's true, then that's actually good to know. Because if, "lightning breaks chainanalysis", then they either force the users to abandon the Lightning Network, but if they can't do that, they hire a service to follow transactions or monitor the network themselves WHICH will require them to buy Bitcoin and open channels - Therefore provide liquidity in Lightning.

¯\_(ツ)_/¯
legendary
Activity: 2870
Merit: 7490
Crypto Swap Exchange
September 16, 2024, 05:57:29 AM
What compliance regulations are they talking about here?
I'd like to know that too. I'd expect local laws in my country to be close to German laws, so this surprises me. Especially since Kraken still allows Monero trading (although I don't know if they made an exception for Germany).

After reading whole stacker.news page and reading some mentioned link, i would speculate it's related with 2 new services/company used by Kraken.

How does this impact me?

German clients who wish to continue using crypto and fiat (bank deposits and withdrawals) services will be required to consent to Payward Ireland Limited and DLT Finance processing their personal data for the purpose of complying with GDPR. As a legal requirement, clients will need to re-verify their identity.

legendary
Activity: 3906
Merit: 6249
Decentralization Maximalist
September 15, 2024, 07:17:06 PM
Surprise, surprise...Kraken exchange  drops Lightning Network in Germany due to compliance reasons.
Kraken employee Marc McKirahan has posted on X that the reasons for the Lightning removal in Germany were technical in nature. He however didn't confirm a date when it will be re-enabled.

There seem to be other services like Strike (according to the answers on Stackernews) which offer the Lightning option in Germany without problems.

European regulations (MiCa) at this moment do not require exchanges to delist Monero or Lightning. This could however change in 2027 due the AMLD6 regulation which forbids services similar to mixers and also mentions "anonymity-enhancing coins", which is however still not completely approved afaik.
legendary
Activity: 1512
Merit: 7340
Farewell, Leo
September 13, 2024, 03:33:37 AM
Lightning is the fUtuRe, adopti0n c0ntinues  Tongue
The beatings will continue until morale improves. Centralized exchanges are what the name says; not a sign of adoption. Monero, for example, is delisted on many exchanges, but is quite adopted on the Internet.

I'd like to know that too. I'd expect local laws in my country to be close to German laws, so this surprises me. Especially since Kraken still allows Monero trading (although I don't know if they made an exception for Germany).
Monero is only allowed to be withdrawn from your Kraken account if you're German, as of September 10th: https://support.kraken.com/hc/en-us/articles/asset-support-for-german-clients. If you cannot surveil your citizens, how can you protect them?
legendary
Activity: 3290
Merit: 16489
Thick-Skinned Gang Leader and Golden Feather 2021
September 13, 2024, 03:28:01 AM
What compliance regulations are they talking about here?
I'd like to know that too. I'd expect local laws in my country to be close to German laws, so this surprises me. Especially since Kraken still allows Monero trading (although I don't know if they made an exception for Germany).
legendary
Activity: 1568
Merit: 6660
bitcoincleanup.com / bitmixlist.org
September 13, 2024, 01:38:30 AM
Surprise, surprise...Kraken exchange  drops Lightning Network in Germany due to compliance reasons.
I am sure all Lightning wallets will be next on the list, probably Phoenix wallet is the first to go.
Lightning is the fUtuRe, adopti0n c0ntinues  Tongue
https://stacker.news/items/681879

What compliance regulations are they talking about here? I couldn't find any links. And "germany compliance lightning network" doesn't return any relevant hits on search engines either.
legendary
Activity: 2212
Merit: 7064
September 12, 2024, 04:45:20 PM
Surprise, surprise...Kraken exchange  drops Lightning Network in Germany due to compliance reasons.
I am sure all Lightning wallets will be next on the list, probably Phoenix wallet is the first to go.
Lightning is the fUtuRe, adopti0n c0ntinues  Tongue
https://stacker.news/items/681879
legendary
Activity: 2898
Merit: 1823
August 27, 2024, 04:51:20 AM


That's the upgrade! Lightning payment channels utilize 2-of-2 multisig addresses. Does having the feature of making them look like regular Bitcoin transactions require an upgrade in Lightning too? Or does that happen automatically of it's already available on-chain? 🤔


Your Lightning node software should handle this, in most cases that's LND or c-Lightning. Don't ask me if both Lightning node softwares do actually have implemented it already. I'm lagging behind current feature status of both. If you do it on the command line or use some fancy interface like Ride The Lighning or similar, all of those "interfaces" talk to LND or c-Lightning to create channels, close them or submit transactions and more.


That's actually the question I wanted to be answered. OK, then the developers should have it implemented for the Lightning node/client/software before it can make multi-sig transactions look the same as the normal transactions. 🤔

Does anyone know if that upgrade is already being discussed in their forums/developer's mailing lists? I believe it's going to be the most important upgrade for Lightning, that will also add more benefit to Bitcoin on-chain transactions - a layer of privacy.
hero member
Activity: 714
Merit: 1010
Crypto Swap Exchange
August 25, 2024, 01:06:26 PM
That's the upgrade! Lightning payment channels utilize 2-of-2 multisig addresses. Does having the feature of making them look like regular Bitcoin transactions require an upgrade in Lightning too? Or does that happen automatically of it's already available on-chain? 🤔
Your Lightning node software should handle this, in most cases that's LND or c-Lightning. Don't ask me if both Lightning node softwares do actually have implemented it already. I'm lagging behind current feature status of both. If you do it on the command line or use some fancy interface like Ride The Lighning or similar, all of those "interfaces" talk to LND or c-Lightning to create channels, close them or submit transactions and more.
legendary
Activity: 2898
Merit: 1823
August 25, 2024, 06:25:58 AM
...

It's Taproot with Schnorr signatures that allows multisig transaction to appear like normal ones. I still fall short to understand Taproot/Tapscript/Schnorr stuff in detail as so far I barely had to interact with it. Excuse my ignorance but I can't even tell if any of the common Lightning nodes have implemented this magic.

Maybe have a look here: https://medium.com/interdax/what-is-taproot-and-how-will-it-benefit-bitcoin-5c8944eed8da

I closed my few LN channels quite some time ago. For my use cases too much hassle to maintain liquidity and channel balances. Phoenix wallet suits me more, totally personal experience, opinion and use case.


That's the upgrade! Lightning payment channels utilize 2-of-2 multisig addresses. Does having the feature of making them look like regular Bitcoin transactions require an upgrade in Lightning too? Or does that happen automatically of it's already available on-chain? 🤔
hero member
Activity: 714
Merit: 1010
Crypto Swap Exchange
August 21, 2024, 10:44:08 AM
...
It's Taproot with Schnorr signatures that allows multisig transaction to appear like normal ones. I still fall short to understand Taproot/Tapscript/Schnorr stuff in detail as so far I barely had to interact with it. Excuse my ignorance but I can't even tell if any of the common Lightning nodes have implemented this magic.

Maybe have a look here: https://medium.com/interdax/what-is-taproot-and-how-will-it-benefit-bitcoin-5c8944eed8da

I closed my few LN channels quite some time ago. For my use cases too much hassle to maintain liquidity and channel balances. Phoenix wallet suits me more, totally personal experience, opinion and use case.
legendary
Activity: 2898
Merit: 1823
August 21, 2024, 12:48:14 AM
What's that upgrade that would make the transactions for opening/closing Lightning channels indistinct from regular Bitcoin on-chain transactions? Was that Taproot/Schnorr multi-signatures? What's its current state of usage in the Lightning Network?

I believe the developers should have something implemented as soon as possible before the government notices the layer of privacy Lightning gives for its users.
legendary
Activity: 2898
Merit: 1823
August 07, 2024, 10:35:48 PM
What's everyone's opinion about Casey Rodarmor's idea? Because it's going to be Open Source, the Dark Markets will be standardized and less susceptible to exploits and backdoors.


I share the same opinion as @maxibitcat:

Why would they prefer dealing with LN channel management instead of just using Monero?

Another thing is micro-payments. I'd bet that darknet market transactions aren't... "micro".


Aren't most of the transactions that happens in the Dark Markets are from retail buyers? LN probably could handle $500.00 Dollar transactions maximum for thousands and thousands of users, no?

Another thing is micro-payments. I'd bet that darknet market transactions aren't... "micro".

Macro, actually, with payments from several hundred to several thousands of dollars. Lightning Network is not designed to handle such a thing. Also channel creation continues to be a pain in the ass.

Besides, dark markets are intentionally designed without Javascript support for security reasons. I don't think they care about UX at all. In fact, I think all the complaints that Rodarmor mentioned are actually good things.


They currently don't care, but if someone built a TOR plugin with better UX like what Casey envisions that's safe, secure, and private enough, I believe they will start to care.

What's everyone's opinion about Casey Rodarmor's idea? Because it's going to be Open Source, the Dark Markets will be standardized and less susceptible to exploits and backdoors.
I share the same opinion as @maxibitcat:
Why would they prefer dealing with LN channel management instead of just using Monero?

To answer maxibitcat - because monero is a shitcoin.


 Cool
legendary
Activity: 3836
Merit: 10832
Self-Custody is a right. Say no to"Non-custodial"
August 07, 2024, 12:24:57 PM
What's everyone's opinion about Casey Rodarmor's idea? Because it's going to be Open Source, the Dark Markets will be standardized and less susceptible to exploits and backdoors.
I share the same opinion as @maxibitcat:
Why would they prefer dealing with LN channel management instead of just using Monero?

To answer maxibitcat - because monero is a shitcoin.
legendary
Activity: 1568
Merit: 6660
bitcoincleanup.com / bitmixlist.org
August 07, 2024, 10:19:00 AM
Another thing is micro-payments. I'd bet that darknet market transactions aren't... "micro".

Macro, actually, with payments from several hundred to several thousands of dollars. Lightning Network is not designed to handle such a thing. Also channel creation continues to be a pain in the ass.

Besides, dark markets are intentionally designed without Javascript support for security reasons. I don't think they care about UX at all. In fact, I think all the complaints that Rodarmor mentioned are actually good things.
legendary
Activity: 1512
Merit: 7340
Farewell, Leo
August 07, 2024, 07:12:27 AM
What's everyone's opinion about Casey Rodarmor's idea? Because it's going to be Open Source, the Dark Markets will be standardized and less susceptible to exploits and backdoors.
I share the same opinion as @maxibitcat:
Why would they prefer dealing with LN channel management instead of just using Monero?

Another thing is micro-payments. I'd bet that darknet market transactions aren't... "micro".
legendary
Activity: 2898
Merit: 1823
August 07, 2024, 07:01:56 AM
Casey Rodarmor suggests an Open Source dedicated Dark Market app/TOR plugin with a better UX and to utilize the Lightning Network.

Quote

The user experience of existing markets is insanely bad, but in pretty fixable ways. They have insane captchas, insane password / pin / backup password requirements, private messages between buyers and sellers must be encrypted and decrypted out-of-browser using PGP, and payments are made primarily with on-chain Monero payments.

This can be solved by creating dedicated client and backend apps which communicate over tor and are able to hold keys, authenticate in both directions using actual cryptography instead of passwords, encrypt and decrypt private messages without needing to download and upload cyphertext manually, and send and receive using lightning.

I think you could produce something with a literal 10x better user experience.

Lightning is under-explored as a privacy technology. Send privacy is good, while recipient privacy is not great. However, recipients can easily make a self-payment to regain privacy.

https://x.com/rodarmor/status/1820207858090410363


What's everyone's opinion about Casey Rodarmor's idea? Because it's going to be Open Source, the Dark Markets will be standardized and less susceptible to exploits and backdoors.
legendary
Activity: 3290
Merit: 16489
Thick-Skinned Gang Leader and Golden Feather 2021
June 26, 2024, 03:45:13 AM
It would not be that easy as setting up a Lightning node, because the problem of Statechains (and the reason why I'm not really interested in that concept) is that the operator is an entity which can steal coins with no possibility for the user to penalize him and claim his coins back.
I can't say that's worse than millions of people who now keep "their" Bitcoins on exchanges, or exchanges that make up their own "wrapped" Bitcoins.
I'm okay with custodial usage for low amounts, as long as it's widely accepted. A bigger problem may be if we get different sidechains from different providers.
legendary
Activity: 3906
Merit: 6249
Decentralization Maximalist
June 03, 2024, 06:14:26 PM
I believe operating as a "state-chain facilitator" to make some profit in fees will pay more than operating a Lighting node because the UTXOs/liquidity in the system is pooled within hubs which users can transfer freely with other users who probably are connected to the same pool or to another high liquidity pool?
It would not be that easy as setting up a Lightning node, because the problem of Statechains (and the reason why I'm not really interested in that concept) is that the operator is an entity which can steal coins with no possibility for the user to penalize him and claim his coins back. This needs some conditions to be fulfilled, basically the Statechain operator has to be able to become an user of one of his own Statechains to steal the funds, but in an anonymous/pseudonymous setting this probably isn't that difficult.

Thus as a statechain operator you must gain trust in a much more pronounced way than as a Lighting node operator. As far as I interpreted the article from Bitcoin Magazine linked above, mercury channels don't change that, because the private key shared between statechain operator and user does not change, it only is "reconfigured" when the user transfers the "statechain coins". Mercury channels "blinding" can however make it more difficult for the Statechain operator to "chase" the users of his own statechain to eventually receive the coins themselves, as they have less knowledge about their activity.

But the primary attack I see is: The statechain operator opens a statechain with itself and then tries to exchange these coins to another user, and once the other user has fullfilled his part of the exchange (e.g. delivered an altcoin, a good/service, fiat etc.) he steals the coins as he has always access to the whole private key.

The "statechain operators" thus - as acknowledged by the creator of the original whitepaper - will be thus mostly federations, like in Liquid, and thus for individuals without recognition and trust in the crypto space it will be very difficult to become part of one of these operators.
legendary
Activity: 2898
Merit: 1823
June 03, 2024, 01:50:15 AM
Bump. I discovered a project called Mercury Layer, https://mercurylayer.com/

Pardon me if everyone already knew and posted about it in the topic, but I have done a quick read/browse on their website, and it suggests that Mercury Layer is like the Lighting Network, which utilizes payment channels, but with the hub-and-spoke model?


Perhaps I haven't heard of it, but I browsed too to find out more of it. from what I have read it's only increasing the privacy of the statechain, according to the site, it's majorly blinding the operators from viewing the contents of what is being transferred like transaction IDs, etc.

Although, I don't know much about tech but I'm privacy oriented so the improvement is good from my perspective because everything will be done off chain just the like lighting network but this time the operator is only allowed to know how many times transactions has been signed but not the contents of the transact not even the pub keys.



https://bitcoinmagazine.com/technical/mercury-layer-a-massive-improvement-on-statechains


Quoted from the same article,

Quote

Statechains are essentially analogous to payment channels in many ways, i.e. they are a collaboratively shared UTXO with a pre-signed transaction as a mechanism of last resort for people to enforce their ownership.
Quote
The major difference between a Lightning channel and a statechain is the parties involved in collaboratively sharing the UTXO, and how ownership of an enforceable claim against it is transferred to other parties[/b].

Unlike a Lightning channel, which is created and shared between two static participants, a statechain is opened with a facilitator/operator, and can be freely transferred in its entirety between any two participants who are willing to trust the operator to be honest, completely off-chain.



I believe operating as a "state-chain facilitator" to make some profit in fees will pay more than operating a Lighting node because the UTXOs/liquidity in the system is pooled within hubs which users can transfer freely with other users who probably are connected to the same pool or to another high liquidity pool?
Pages:
Jump to: