The problem is not themselves not what they do. It's what they don't in fact. They don't reproduce, and that's the main concern. They still have reproductionals organs, but they can't use it, since there's no woman to be the mother, since this is two males. Not perpetuate the dynasty is the main concern I have with them.
Homosexuals represent 1-12% in all animal species. With sheep at 12% in the top spot. In humans it is around 2%, or 1 in 50 men is gay.
Not sure it is a big deal if they don't reproduce. We have too many people anyway.
We need less people not more:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eOykY2SMbZ0for a long-term survival of our specie.
Exponential function is what will kill us.
If you take a global point of view, yes, that might be possible. But take a local point of view, of a country. France has space and have a lot of agriculutural excedents. Why couldn't the population grows ? Also, you have the Whites, or about 1/7 humans.
This proportions has to be increased, especially when the mondialists want 7/7 of a global mixed race.To understand my point of view, you have to see mankind as a war where each race is fighting for themselves. For this, the more soldiers the better. Of course, we won't go by the World and slaughter everyone. This is metaphoric.
Bryant, they can reproduce, but take the children. Shouldn't they have a normal situation ?
Not sure I follow. I think you are saying that whites have to reproduce at a faster rate than non-whites.
I ask you why? Why you think there should be a competition between races?
From a biological stand point, more genetic diversity is beneficial to humans. Not sure why you think whites need to fight by reproducing more.
I think you better enjoy your life, it is only life you got. Stop worrying about gays or whites not reproducing.
Actually, mixed race might be a solution, so that no race can claim superiority. Remember mutts are always healthier than pure bred dogs
Problem is that people tend to forget their roots. Europe is under pressure. Two ways are proposed : the stop of the immigration or to fight it by an high birthrate. I prefer a world where each people stay where it was originally than a total White world, but if people start to take our land, you need to ripost, or at the final, you'll get the unified mondialist world, with not diversified and beautiful people, but an army of customers.
Bryant, they can reproduce, but take the children. Shouldn't they have a normal situation ?
As I posted above, I don't support gays adopting children. But I am perfectly OK with them fathering children through artificial insemination and surrogacy. At least they are producing their own biological children (although still just 50% parentage). The "normal" solution here would be one of the homosexuals having natural sex with a willing female partner and producing a child in the "normal" way. But then, it gets complicated.
I am against any contact between gays and children. In the actual way of things, you have to reproduce, and if they adopt or whatever, first, you produces children off-bride, and that's unhealthy, and then, children integrate this scheme and will most likely imitate it, because you tend to follow your parents. And that's always a problem for them when they get bullied at school, or feel bad, because they don't have a mother for the Mother's day...
