Topic: Open Source XPM (Primecoin) GPU Miner & Pool xpmforall.org - page 44. (Read 110019 times)
r9 380 - miner crash with 15.7.1 drivers
It would be awesome if this os gpu miner could be used on the new Polaris cards (480/480x) given their respective TDPs.....
any info about r9 390/390x ?
1100/1500 ~6.8
your results?
your results?
at least it works with 15.12 =)
380 have same qty of shaders, etc as 7950. It should push 9+ cpd. All problem in drivers.
380 have same qty of shaders, etc as 7950. It should push 9+ cpd. All problem in drivers.
How many cpd you got with 15.12 drivers?
at least it works with 15.12 =)
380 have same qty of shaders, etc as 7950. It should push 9+ cpd. All problem in drivers.
380 have same qty of shaders, etc as 7950. It should push 9+ cpd. All problem in drivers.
R9 380 1100/1500 ~6.8 15.11
Any way to run 380 on 14.x drivers? I think it will be faster, because when I put it first time to rig with 7950 and 14.x drivers. I saw 380 hashing 7+ cpd in stock. But then driver auto updated to 15.12 and I was unable to run 380 on 14 drivers anymore.
I'm also very interested how mach will push R9 390? Somebody have this info?
Any way to run 380 on 14.x drivers? I think it will be faster, because when I put it first time to rig with 7950 and 14.x drivers. I saw 380 hashing 7+ cpd in stock. But then driver auto updated to 15.12 and I was unable to run 380 on 14 drivers anymore.
I'm also very interested how mach will push R9 390? Somebody have this info?
I don't think that R9 380 will work with drivers below 15.15
R9 380 1100/1500 ~6.8 15.11
Any way to run 380 on 14.x drivers? I think it will be faster, because when I put it first time to rig with 7950 and 14.x drivers. I saw 380 hashing 7+ cpd in stock. But then driver auto updated to 15.12 and I was unable to run 380 on 14 drivers anymore.
I'm also very interested how mach will push R9 390? Somebody have this info?
Any way to run 380 on 14.x drivers? I think it will be faster, because when I put it first time to rig with 7950 and 14.x drivers. I saw 380 hashing 7+ cpd in stock. But then driver auto updated to 15.12 and I was unable to run 380 on 14 drivers anymore.
I'm also very interested how mach will push R9 390? Somebody have this info?
Yes it is small - normally R7 260X is 1/3 of R9 280X. I try it for a lot of algorithms X11, X13, Eterum and gives around 1/3. Only for quark gives a little bit more than 1/3 of R9 280X
I am trying to compare the characteristics of some cards, but do not understand what is crucial. Core frequency? At the moment I only understood that the frequency of memory and amount of memory are not very important.
Core frequency and FP64 is very important. As you can see on this http://www.anandtech.com/show/9387/amd-radeon-300-series/2
R9 380 is similar to R9 280 except it has weaker FP64. R9 380 has 1/16FP64 and R9 280 has 1/4FP64.
R9 380 is obviously slower for mining XPM but it is good for ETH.
Hello, dear xpm-miners!
Anybody can share with experience of using R9 380, 380x? What CPD can be expected?
Thank you!
R9 380 (GPU 1000MHz, mem 1500MHz) 6 cpdAnybody can share with experience of using R9 380, 380x? What CPD can be expected?
Thank you!
Hello, dear xpm-miners!
Anybody can share with experience of using R9 380, 380x? What CPD can be expected?
Thank you!
Anybody can share with experience of using R9 380, 380x? What CPD can be expected?
Thank you!
R9 380 (GPU 1000MHz, mem 1500MHz) 6 cpd
Nice one, thanks for sharing and building this! I'm going to try it now!
Hello, dear xpm-miners!
Anybody can share with experience of using R9 380, 380x? What CPD can be expected?
Thank you!
Anybody can share with experience of using R9 380, 380x? What CPD can be expected?
Thank you!
Did anyone had block transfer from 3/6?
I can't get any XPM now.
I can't get any XPM now.
Asus R9 290x mine 13.5 CPD why?
GPU 1050
MEM 1350
powertune+50
GPU 1000
MEM 1250 give me 12-12.5 CPD
powertune+50
Data:
miner 9.4.1
win 8 cat 14.4 (amd-catalyst-14.4-64bit-win8.1-win8-win7-whql-aug)
conf
Any advice?
p.s. memory elpida
and MSI afterburn show GPU load like (100%-96%-100%) -----------_---------
GPU 1050
MEM 1350
powertune+50
GPU 1000
MEM 1250 give me 12-12.5 CPD
powertune+50
Data:
miner 9.4.1
win 8 cat 14.4 (amd-catalyst-14.4-64bit-win8.1-win8-win7-whql-aug)
conf
Quote
...
onCrash = "0";
cpuload = "1";
target = "10";
sieveSize = "420";
weaveDepth = "40960";
width = "20";
devices = ["1", "1", "1", "1", "1"];
sieveprimorial = ["13", "13", "13", "13", "13"];
sievePerRound = ["5", "5", "5", "5", "5"];
...
onCrash = "0";
cpuload = "1";
target = "10";
sieveSize = "420";
weaveDepth = "40960";
width = "20";
devices = ["1", "1", "1", "1", "1"];
sieveprimorial = ["13", "13", "13", "13", "13"];
sievePerRound = ["5", "5", "5", "5", "5"];
...
Any advice?
p.s. memory elpida
and MSI afterburn show GPU load like (100%-96%-100%) -----------_---------
Hello!
I'm mining on HD 7850 (it's about 4.7 CPD).
Anyone tried to use new analog of this card - R7 260X (or another R7 series, there are no R7 in "GPUs supportes" at the first message of this topic).
I'm mining on HD 7850 (it's about 4.7 CPD).
Anyone tried to use new analog of this card - R7 260X (or another R7 series, there are no R7 in "GPUs supportes" at the first message of this topic).
Maybe you mean R9 270 which is analog 7850 i guess
R9 270 ~ 5,4 CPD (950/1400) Downvolted to 1,0v
Hello, qqqq!
I mean exactly R7. Is it supported with this miner?
I don't have R7. And my results was obtained with Claymore miner.
Hi - Yes it is supported.
I mine with such card R7 260X and it gave me about 3,4 CPD
gollumist, qqqq, thank you for your answers!
hmm.. 3.4 CPD is very small. I thought that it would be the same as hd7850 (4.7 CPD).
The 260X is effectively a 7790 (Bonaire core) with 892SP and only a 128bit bus.
OTOH, the 265 is a what amounts to a 7830, or R9 270LE. It is a Pitcairn class chip with a 256bit bus and 1024SP. Frankly put, the 265 has no business being labeled as a R7 class chip and/or in 26x nomenclature.
If you think back to the 5xxx series, the 265 is pretty much the 5830 where your R7 260/260X chips are the 5750/5770 and your R9 270/270Xs are the 5850/5870.
So, your results are inline with expectations given the 265's bump in hardware resources over the 260X.
why not pay to 12/27/2015? AQxUY5wZsUsnVveuSugFdr4tLPkwzmBNNT
Yes it is small - normally R7 260X is 1/3 of R9 280X. I try it for a lot of algorithms X11, X13, Eterum and gives around 1/3. Only for quark gives a little bit more than 1/3 of R9 280X
I am trying to compare the characteristics of some cards, but do not understand what is crucial. Core frequency? At the moment I only understood that the frequency of memory and amount of memory are not very important.
gollumist, qqqq, thank you for your answers!
hmm.. 3.4 CPD is very small. I thought that it would be the same as hd7850 (4.7 CPD).
Yes it is small - normally R7 260X is 1/3 of R9 280X. I try it for a lot of algorithms X11, X13, Eterum and gives around 1/3. Only for quark gives a little bit more than 1/3 of R9 280X
Jump to: